⚖️ IP Feed
30m delayFederal IP filings, live from PACER.
Google131· 57 activeAmazon109· 67 activeSamsung103· 45 activeApple90· 38 activeSony52· 29 activeMeta46· 28 activeMicrosoft41· 19 activeNetflix40· 23 activeAT&T34· 13 activeOpenAI33· 20 activeCisco31· 19 activeNetlist30· 17 activeUniversal30· 12 activeDisney24· 16 activeMicron23· 16 activeHeadwater Research20· 18 activeWarner Bros20· 12 activeZoom19· 12 activeAnthropic18· 13 activeT-Mobile18· 8 activeVerizon18· 7 activeDigiMedia Tech16· 4 activeMedia Key16· 5 activeValtrus Innovations16· 9 activeTesla15· 8 activeIntercurrency Software14· 6 activeIntel13· 6 activeSnap13· 4 activeAdobe12· 6 activeBroadcast Music12· 8 activeGoogle131· 57 activeAmazon109· 67 activeSamsung103· 45 activeApple90· 38 activeSony52· 29 activeMeta46· 28 activeMicrosoft41· 19 activeNetflix40· 23 activeAT&T34· 13 activeOpenAI33· 20 activeCisco31· 19 activeNetlist30· 17 activeUniversal30· 12 activeDisney24· 16 activeMicron23· 16 activeHeadwater Research20· 18 activeWarner Bros20· 12 activeZoom19· 12 activeAnthropic18· 13 activeT-Mobile18· 8 activeVerizon18· 7 activeDigiMedia Tech16· 4 activeMedia Key16· 5 activeValtrus Innovations16· 9 activeTesla15· 8 activeIntercurrency Software14· 6 activeIntel13· 6 activeSnap13· 4 activeAdobe12· 6 activeBroadcast Music12· 8 active
Federal IP filings, live from PACER
Know about every patent, copyright, and trademark lawsuit in U.S. federal court — as soon as it's filed.
Plain-English AI summaries, curated news for every case, and watchlists that email you the moment a new filing names anyone on your list.
Free tier shows filings with a 30-minute delay. Federal courts only (no state courts yet).
- ActiveflsdDistrictTrademark· 1:26-cv-252024hFFPC LLC v. Blitz Studios, Inc.FFPC LLC is seeking declaratory judgment against Blitz Studios over a trademark dispute in federal court. The case centers on competing claims to a trademark, with FFPC seeking judicial clarity on ownership or use rights. Details on the specific mark and business context remain limited from the docket information.AI28:2201 Declaratory JudgmentFFPC LLC (plaintiff); Blitz Studios, Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-07-31T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivetxedDistrictPatent· 2:24-cv-009102hTransparence, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Transparence LLC sues Samsung for infringing its patent technology in electronic devices.AI35:145 Patent InfringementTransparence, LLC (plaintiff); Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (defendant); Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (defendant); Daivd Keyzer (technical advisor); David Folsom (mediator)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechSamsungfiled 2024-11-11T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveflsdDistrictTrademark· 9:26-cv-810183hCordoba Legal Group PLLC v. Duo Studios Incorporated d/b/a The Credit PeopleCordoba Legal Group is suing Duo Studios (operating as The Credit People) for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The case centers on alleged unauthorized use of Cordoba's trademark in the credit repair and financial services space. The dispute involves competing claims over brand identity and marketplace confusion in the consumer credit industry.AI15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)Cordoba Legal Group PLLC (plaintiff); Duo Studios Incorporated (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-08-18T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- NewcacdDistrictCopyright· 2:26-cv-118821hGreenberg v. Creative Artists Agency LLCJill Greenberg and her studio are suing Creative Artists Agency LLC for copyright infringement. The case centers on alleged unauthorized use of Greenberg's copyrighted work. Details about the specific images or creative materials at issue are not available from the court record.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementJill Greenberg Studio, Inc. (plaintiff); Jill Greenberg (plaintiff); Creative Artists Agency LLC (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentCreative Artists Agencyfiled 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: defendanttxedDistrictPatent· 2:25-cv-001235hH2 Intellect LLC v. The Home Depot, Inc.H2 Intellect sues Home Depot for patent infringement involving intellectual property technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementH2 Intellect LLC (plaintiff); Home Depot Product Authority, LLC (defendant); Home Depot U.S.A. Inc. (defendant); The Home Depot, Inc. (defendant); Scott Woloson (technical advisor); Hon. Jeff Kaplan (Ret.) (mediator); Whole Foods Market, Inc. (consol defendant); Amazon.com Services LLC (consol defendant); Amazon.Com, Inc., (consol defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechAmazonfiled 2025-02-03T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictCopyright· 1:26-cv-059541hBravo v. Sony Music Publishing LLCEstates of Angela Stone and Biggie Smalls sue Sony and others for copyright infringement over music publishing rights.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementJean Albert Renaud (plaintiff); David Bravo (plaintiff); The Estate of Angela Laverne Stone (defendant); The Estate of Christopher George Latore Wallace (defendant); Sean John Combs (defendant); Cornell Iral Haynes, Jr. (defendant); Calvin Cordozar Broadus, Jr. (defendant); Phalon Anton Alexander (defendant); Bad Boy Records, LLC (defendant); Universal Music International Limited (defendant); Warner Chappell Music, Inc. (defendant); Sony Music Entertainment (defendant); Sony Music Publishing LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainment🎵 MusicUniversalSonySony MusicUniversal Musicfiled 2026-07-14T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-12T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecacdDistrictTrademark· 2:24-cv-042621dChrome Hearts LLC v. GrailsChrome Hearts LLC is suing Jessica Datry, Alexander Eshaghian, Grails La Appeal Inc, Distro WorldWide LLC, and LUX 18 LLC for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The case centers on unauthorized use of Chrome Hearts' trademark, a luxury brand known for high-end jewelry and accessories. The defendants allegedly sold counterfeit or infringing goods using Chrome Hearts' protected mark.AI15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)Chrome Hearts LLC (plaintiff); Jessica R. Datry (defendant); Distro WorldWide, LLC (defendant); DOES (defendant); LUX 18 LLC (defendant); Alexander Eshaghian (defendant); Grails La Appeal Inc (defendant); Diane Faber (mediator (adr panel))🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2024-05-22T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-10T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictTrademark· 1:26-cv-0599722hHellstar Studios, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the ComplaintHellstar Studios sues unnamed defendants for trademark infringement in federal court.AI15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)zsddfzsddfv (121) (defendant); zhijiangzijianwangluokejidianpu (120) (defendant); ZHI XIANG STOY (119) (defendant); Z14514 (118) (defendant); Yuega Tshrit (117) (defendant); You are dazzling (116) (defendant); XZXD CV VBB (115) (defendant); XVTYUBVND (114) (defendant); ximingshop (113) (defendant); xiaoaitongxue (112) (defendant); XDCFVBGV (111) (defendant); WORLD TRADE SPOTLIGH (110) (defendant); Whimsical Caseshop (109) (defendant); Vividchic Shop (108) (defendant); VibrantTees (107) (defendant); UTRHKKLUY (106) (defendant); Urban Edge Tees (105) (defendant); uohu (104) (defendant); UhMWNJ3HHknxXsN (103) (defendant); TRNDHUB (102) (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:23-cv-102113dAlter v. OpenAI Inc.Alter sues OpenAI for copyright infringement, alleging the AI company used copyrighted works without permission to train its models.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementOpenAI Holdings LLC (defendant); OAI Corporation (defendant); OpenAI Global, L.L.C. (defendant); OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C. (defendant); Andrea Bartz (interested party); Dario Amodei (interested party); Benjamin J. Mann (interested party); Simon & Schuster LLC (miscellaneous); Andrew Greer (third party defendant); ANDREW SEAN GREER (third party plaintiff); Rachel Louise Synder (third party plaintiff); Richard Kadrey (third party plaintiff); Christopher Golden (third party plaintiff); Sarah Silverman (third party plaintiff); Paul Tremblay (third party plaintiff); Lippman Laura (consolidated third party plaintiff); Junot Daz (consolidated third party plaintiff); Ta-Nehisi Coates (consolidated third party plaintiff); Reuters News & Media Inc (respondent); Thomas C. Rubin Microsoft Corporation (consolidated defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechMicrosoftOpenAIfiled 2023-11-21T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveflsdDistrictPatent· 1:24-cv-212262dHernandez v. Stingray Digital Group Inc.Edwin Hernandez sues Stingray Digital and multiple telecom/media companies for patent infringement.AI15:1126 Patent InfringementEGLA Corp. (plaintiff); Edwin A. Hernandez (plaintiff); Does 1-100 (defendant); Stingray Group Inc. (defendant); Blue Stream Communications, LLC d/b/a Blue Stream Fiber (defendant); Millicom International Services, LLC (defendant); Mood Media, LLC (defendant); AT&T Enterprises, LLC (defendant); DOES 1-700 (defendant); Millicom, Inc. (defendant); AT&T, Inc. (defendant); Stingray Music USA, Inc. (defendant); Stingray Digital Group Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechAT&Tfiled 2024-04-02T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivetxedDistrictPatent· 2:25-cv-005283dHayden AI Technologies, Inc. v. Fleetmind Seon Solutions Inc.Hayden AI Technologies is suing Fleetmind Seon Solutions for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The dispute centers on a patent owned by Hayden AI; Fleetmind is accused of infringing it. The case involves technical claims that David Keyzer has advised on.AI35:271 Patent InfringementHayden AI Technologies, Inc. (plaintiff); Fleetmind Seon Solutions Inc. (defendant); David Keyzer (technical advisor); David Folsom (mediator)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-05-15T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecacdDistrictCopyright· 2:24-cv-090332dAlcon Entertainment, LLC v. Tesla, Inc.Alcon Entertainment sued Tesla for copyright infringement, alleging Tesla used protected content without authorization.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementAlcon Entertainment, LLC (plaintiff); Warner Bros Discovery Inc (defendant); Elon Musk (defendant); Tesla, Inc. (defendant); PUBLICIS MEDIA FRANCE, S.A. (movant); AUTOMOBILES PEUGEOT S.A. (FRANCE) (movant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechWarner BrosTeslafiled 2024-10-21T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictCopyright· 1:25-md-031433dIn Re: OpenAI, Inc. Copyright Infringement LitigationMultiple parties sue OpenAI for copyright infringement over training its AI models on copyrighted works.AI17:101 Copyright InfringementwikiHow, Inc. (plaintiff); Dana Loewy (plaintiff); Lion Den, Inc. (plaintiff); Kevin T. Patton (plaintiff); Alan J. Marcus (plaintiff); Zvi Bodie (plaintiff); Kenneth S. Saladin (plaintiff); Michael Sullivan (plaintiff); Wick Communications (plaintiff); White Mountain Publishing LLC (plaintiff); WEHCO Newspapers, Inc. (plaintiff); Straus Newspapers, Inc. (plaintiff); Straus Media-Manhattan, LLC (plaintiff); OpenAI Global, LLC (defendant); OpenAI OpCo, LLC (defendant); OpenAI Foundation (f/k/a OpenAI Inc.) (defendant); OpenAI Foundation (defendant); D.A. Publishing, LC (defendant); AIM Media Midwest Operating, LLC (defendant); United States of America (interested party)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechOpenAIfiled 2025-04-11T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivededDistrictPatent· 1:26-cv-005783dInnoBrilliance, LLC v. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.InnoBrilliance sues Warner Bros. Discovery for allegedly infringing its patent technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementInnoBrilliance, LLC (plaintiff); Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentWarner Brosfiled 2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictCopyright· 1:25-cv-096973dHumm v. MSNBC Cable, LLCAndy Humm and Ann Northrop sued MSNBC for copyright infringement over Gay USA content.AI17:101 Copyright InfringementHumm and Northrop d/b/a Gay USA (plaintiff); Andy Humm (plaintiff); Ann Northrop (plaintiff); John & Jane Does 1 through 10 (defendant); John & Jane Does, LLC (defendant); Yahoo, Inc. (defendant); Jonathan Capehart (defendant); Versant Media, LLC (defendant); Verizon Communications Inc. (defendant); Apollo Global Management, Inc. (defendant); Comcast Corporation (defendant); NBC Universal Media LLC (defendant); MSNBC Cable, LLC (defendant); John & Jane Does, Inc.1 through 10 (adr provider); John & Jane Does, LLC 1 through 10 (adr provider)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechUniversalComcastVerizonfiled 2025-11-21T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ClosedcandDistrictPatent· 4:21-cv-032202dGoogle LLC v. EcoFactor, Inc.Google is seeking declaratory judgment against EcoFactor over patent claims, likely involving smart thermostat or energy management technology. The lawsuit centers on whether Google's products infringe EcoFactor's patents, with Google proactively filing to establish non-infringement or invalidity before facing an infringement suit.AI28:2201 Declaratory JudgementGoogle LLC (plaintiff); EcoFactor, Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechGooglefiled 2021-04-30T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecandDistrictCopyright· 5:24-cv-038111dConcord Music Group, Inc. v. Anthropic PBCConcord Music Group sues Anthropic for copyright infringement, alleging the AI company used its songs to train AI models.AI17:101 Copyright InfringementWarner Chappell Music, Inc. (movant); Sony Music Publishing (US) LLC (movant); RH Carlin Holdings LLC (miscellaneous); GFP Co-Invest, LP (miscellaneous); Round Hill Music Royalty Fund III, LP (miscellaneous); Round Hill Music Royalty Fund III Plus, LP (miscellaneous); Round Hill Music Royalty Fund II, LP (miscellaneous); Round Hill Music LP (miscellaneous); A.I. Progress, Inc. (amicus); Computer & Communications Industry Association (amicus); Electronic Frontier Foundation (amicus); Engine Advocacy (amicus); Copyright Law Professors (amicus); BMG Rights Management (US) LLC (witness); Authors Guild (amicus); International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (amicus); SoundExchange, Inc. (amicus); Kirk Wallace Johnson (miscellaneous); Charles Graeber (miscellaneous); Andrea Bartz (miscellaneous)🎬 Entertainment🎵 Music💻 TechSonySony MusicBMGSoundExchangeAnthropicfiled 2024-06-26T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ClosedPress: plaintifftxedDistrictPatent· 2:23-cv-003523dHeadwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc.Headwater Research sues Verizon for allegedly infringing its patents in telecommunications technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementHeadwater Research LLC (plaintiff); Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc. (defendant); Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless (defendant); Verizon Communications Inc. (defendant); David Folsom (mediator); Michael D. Paul (technical advisor)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechVerizonfiled 2023-07-28T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivetxedDistrictPatent· 2:23-cv-005393dSK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd.SK nexilis sued Solus Advanced Materials and its Volta Energy Solutions subsidiaries for patent infringement in Texas federal court. The lawsuit concerns a patent-protected technology or process, though the specific patent number and technical details are not identified in the case record. The dispute involves multiple Volta entities across Canada, Hungary, and Europe.AI35:271 Patent InfringementSK nexilis Co., Ltd. (plaintiff); Volta Energy Solutions Canada Inc. (defendant); Volta Energy Solutions Hungary KFT (defendant); Volta Energy Solutions Europe KFT (defendant); Volta Energy Solutions S.A.R.L. (defendant); Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. (defendant); David Folsom (mediator); David Keyzer (technical advisor)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2023-11-21T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ClosedtxedDistrictPatent· 2:23-cv-005212dBarco, Inc. v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd.Barco and Barco, Inc. sued Yealink and Yealink (USA) over patent infringement in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. The case involves allegations that Yealink's technology infringes one or more patents held by Barco, though the specific patent numbers and technology at issue are not identified in the court record provided.AI35:271 Patent InfringementBarco NV (plaintiff); Barco, Inc. (plaintiff); Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Hon. David Folsom (mediator); Michael Dean Paul (technical advisor)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2023-11-14T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:24-cv-032853dDaily News LP v. Microsoft CorporationDaily News LP sues Microsoft for copyright infringement over alleged unauthorized use of news content.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementDP Media Network, LLC (plaintiff); San Jose Mercury-News, LLC (plaintiff); Sun-sentinel Company, LLC (plaintiff); Orlando Sentinel Communications Company, LLC (plaintiff); Northwest Publications, LLC (plaintiff); ORB Publishing, LLC (plaintiff); Chicago Tribune Company, LLC (plaintiff); OpenAI Group PBC (defendant); Microsoft Corporation (defendant); OpenAI Holdings, LLC (defendant); OAI Corporation, LLC (defendant); OpenAI Global, L.L.C. (defendant); OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C. (defendant); OpenAI, LLC (defendant); OpenAI GP, LLC (defendant); OpenAI LP (defendant); OpenAI, Inc. (defendant); United States of America (interested party); Jonathan Alter (interested party); Authors Guild (interested party)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechMicrosoftOpenAIfiled 2024-04-30T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveflsdDistrictTrademark· 1:24-cv-247003dRonin Factory, LLC v. Import Global, LLCRonin Factory sues Import Global for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act.AI15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)Ronin Factory, LLC (plaintiff); Lindsay Miller (defendant); Abraham Habosha (defendant); Import Global, LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2024-12-02T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- NewdedDistrictPatent· 1:26-cv-012903dElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute v. The Walt Disney CompanySouth Korean research institutions—including the Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute and three universities—are suing Disney and its streaming subsidiaries (ESPN, Hulu, BAMTech, Disney DTC, and others) for patent infringement. The plaintiffs claim Disney's streaming platforms infringe one or more patents, though the specific patent or technology at issue is not identified in available case records.AI35:271 Patent InfringementKwangwoon University Industry-Academic Collaboration Foundation (plaintiff); Industry-University Cooperation Foundation of Korea Aerospace University (plaintiff); University-Industry Cooperation Group of Kyung Hee University (plaintiff); Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (plaintiff); ESPN, LLC (defendant); Hulu, LLC (defendant); BAMTech, LLC (defendant); Disney Platform Distribution, Inc. (defendant); Disney DTC LLC (defendant); Disney Entertainment & Sports LLC (defendant); Disney Streaming Services LLC (defendant); Disney Media and Entertainment Distribution LLC (defendant); The Walt Disney Company (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 Tech🏆 SportsWalt DisneyDisneyHuluESPNfiled 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: defendantdedDistrictPatent· 1:26-cv-007763dAdeia Media Holdings Inc. v. FuboTV Inc.Adeia Media Holdings sues FuboTV for patent infringement related to media streaming technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementAdeia Media Holdings Inc. (plaintiff); FuboTV Media LLC (defendant); Fubo Services LLC (defendant); Fubo Operations LLC (defendant); FuboTV Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-06-30T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictCopyright· 1:24-cv-084232dNurseInTheMaking LLC v. Best Nurse Ever LLCNurseInTheMaking sues Best Nurse Ever for copyright infringement over nursing education content.AI28:1338cp Copyright InfringementNurseInTheMaking LLC (plaintiff); Federico Crespi (defendant); CF Capital Group LLC (defendant); Best Nurse Ever FZ LLC (defendant); FOMA Media Agency (defendant); Best Nurse Ever LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 Techfiled 2024-11-05T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:25-cv-043152dZiff Davis, Inc. v. OpenAI, Inc.Ziff Davis sues OpenAI for copyright infringement, alleging AI training on published content without permission.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementCNET MEDIA, INC. (plaintiff); Mashable, Inc. (plaintiff); Everyday Health Media LLC (plaintiff); IGN Entertainment Inc. (plaintiff); Ziff Davis, LLC (plaintiff); Ziff Davis Inc. (plaintiff); OpenAI Group PBC (defendant); OpenAI Holdings LLC (defendant); OAI Corporation (defendant); OpenAI Global LLC (defendant); OpenAI OpCo LLC (defendant); OpenAI LLC (defendant); OpenAI GP LLC (defendant); OpenAI Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechOpenAIfiled 2025-05-22T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictTrademark· 1:26-cv-056743d419Studios Ltd. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint419 Studios sues unnamed defendants for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act in federal court.AI15:1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)419Studios Ltd. (plaintiff); The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:24-cv-015152dThe Intercept Media, Inc. v. OpenAI, Inc.The Intercept sues OpenAI for copyright infringement under the DMCA, claiming unauthorized use of protected content.AI17:1201 Digital Millennium Copyright ActThe Intercept Media, Inc. (plaintiff); OpenAI Group PBC (defendant); Microsoft Corporation (defendant); OpenAI Holdings, LLC (defendant); OAI Corporation, LLC (defendant); OpenAI Global LLC (defendant); OpenAI OpCo LLC (defendant); OpenAI, LLC (defendant); OpenAI GP, LLC (defendant); OpenAI, Inc. (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechMicrosoftOpenAIfiled 2024-02-28T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-09T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveilndDistrictPatent· 1:26-cv-058663dSpectraNet Technologies LLC v. Jump Financial, LLCSpectraNet Technologies sues Jump Financial and related entities for patent infringement in federal court.AI35:271 Patent InfringementSpectraNet Technologies LLC (plaintiff); 10Band LLC (defendant); New Line Networks LLC (defendant); Virtu Financial, Inc., (defendant); World Class Wireless, LLC (defendant); Jump Trading, LLC (defendant); Jump Trading Holdings, LLC (defendant); Jump Financial, LLC (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentNew Linefiled 2026-05-20T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveilndDistrictPatent· 1:24-cv-0528015hMarvel Technology (China) Co., Limited v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule AMarvel Technology sues 19 Chinese companies and online sellers for infringing patents in photo booth technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementShenzhen Qunan Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Luxury Looks (defendant); 360 Smart Photo Booth Inc. (defendant); Vanplex Photo Booth Store (defendant); Evegogo Store (defendant); Rossmine Official Store (defendant); HYWINLIFE Official Store (defendant); Furmores Official Store (defendant); Shenzhen SeenTok Co, Ltd (defendant); Shenzhen Furmores Technology Co., Ltd (defendant); Chengdu Tops Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Shenzhen Fantasy View Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Shenzhen WiViTouch Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Shenzhen Rossmine Co., Ltd. (defendant); Shenzhen Hywinlife Co., Ltd (defendant); Shenzhen Vanplex Co., Ltd. (defendant); TOPS Tech (defendant); FASHINN360 (defendant); SX LLC (defendant); FTY360 (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentMarvelfiled 2024-06-25T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnyedDistrictTrademark· 1:26-cv-021724dGilead Sciences, Inc. v. Pain Relief Rx, Inc.Gilead Sciences sues multiple pharmacies and individuals for infringing its trademarks.AI15:1114 Trademark InfringementDavid Levy (defendant); Sildevie Tchiekoua Nguetcho (defendant); Selvia Girgis (defendant); Michael Kaldas (defendant); Trinity Global Pharmacy LLC (defendant); Spectra Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); SkyRx Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); MDRx Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); Ez Max Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); ClearRx Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); Galaxy Pharmacy Inc. (defendant); Gerda Shimuniva (defendant); Zoya Meirov (defendant); Marina Davidov (defendant); Benjamin Levy (defendant); Susana Levy (defendant); Daniel Levy (defendant); Alex Levy (defendant); Richard Galanti (defendant); Ariel Levy (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentMaxfiled 2026-04-14T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnyedDistrictTrademark· 1:24-cv-042593dGilead Sciences, Inc. v. KhaimGilead Sciences sues multiple pharmaceutical distributors and consultants for trademark infringement.AI15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)River Chemists Corp. (defendant); Roman Shamalov (defendant); Galaxy RX Inc. (defendant); Irina Polvanova (defendant); Crystal Medina (defendant); Dezyre Baez (defendant); David Fernandez (defendant); Island Pharmacy & Discount Corp. (defendant); Christy Corvalan (defendant); Pure Gear Consulting, Inc. (defendant); Y&S Statistic Medical Suply Inc (defendant); Y&S Statistic Medical Supply Inc. (defendant); Foster Media Pharmaceutical Supply Corp. (defendant); Foster Media Group, Inc. (defendant); Pharmaceutical Way, Inc. (defendant); Park Avenue Pharmaceutical Corp. (defendant); Onliner Marketing Corp. (defendant); New Line of Pharmaceutical, Inc. (defendant); Merric Billing Inc. (defendant); Richard Crisona (mediator)🎬 EntertainmentNew Linefiled 2024-06-17T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictPatent· 1:25-cv-102282dDong Guan Jia Shuan Co. Ltd. v. UsLikeDiyDong Guan Jia Shuan sues 20+ online retailers for patent infringement involving unspecified cycling and gadget products.AI28:1331 Fed. QuestionCar Moto Part Factory Store (defendant); Windchaser Cycling Store (defendant); WEST BIKING Gobike Store (defendant); Sam Cycling Sports Store (defendant); Shop1103857702 Store (defendant); Airjourney 2 Store (defendant); Green Tea Store (defendant); Smart Choice Store (defendant); GGMMAS Stylish Store (defendant); Shop1104910413 Store (defendant); California FBM Store (defendant); Xinwan Supply Chain (defendant); hengyunzhineng (defendant); Yucen-US (defendant); Joe's gadget store (defendant); TOSUOD Cycling Hive (defendant); Airjourney (defendant); GYH Store (defendant); Xiaonas Entrepreneurship (defendant); Guangzhou Qihang Technology Development Co., Ltd. (intervenor defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-12-10T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveflsdDistrictCopyright· 9:26-cv-810254dPeterson v. Sandow Media, LLCChristopher Peterson is suing Sandow Media for copyright infringement in federal court. The lawsuit centers on alleged unauthorized use of Peterson's copyrighted work. Details about the specific creative work at issue are not publicly available in this filing.AI17:0501 Copyright InfringementChristopher Peterson (plaintiff); Sandow Media, LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-08-19T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ClosednysdDistrictCopyright· 1:26-cv-067444dMcGucken v. Eat This, LLCDr. Elliot McGucken is suing Eat This LLC, Galvanized Media, Galvanized Brands, Shutterstock, and unnamed defendants for copyright infringement. McGucken alleges the defendants used his copyrighted photographs without permission in connection with food or media content. The case centers on unauthorized use of his creative works.AI17:101 Copyright InfringementDr. Elliot McGucken (plaintiff); Does 1-10 (defendant); Shutterstock, Inc. (defendant); Galvanized Media, LLC (defendant); Galvanized Brands, LLC (defendant); Eat This, LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-08-06T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivededDistrictPatent· 1:26-cv-011614dDISH Technologies L.L.C. v. Echelon Fitness Multimedia, LLCDISH Technologies is suing Echelon Fitness Multimedia for patent infringement. The case involves alleged unauthorized use of DISH's patented technology, likely related to multimedia delivery or fitness-related interactive systems. The dispute centers on whether Echelon's products or services infringe one or more of DISH's protected patents.AI28:1338 Patent Infringement🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-09-15T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActiveilndDistrictTrademark· 1:25-cv-023364dRichemont International S.A. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule ARichemont sues 20 Chinese companies for allegedly counterfeiting its luxury watch and jewelry trademarks.AI15:44 Trademark InfringementThe Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A (defendant); Dongguan Honghuixin Watch Industry Co., Ltd. (defendant); Yiwu Edommy Imp. & Exp. Co., Ltd. (defendant); Yiwu Chaopai Jewelry Company Limited (defendant); Hefei City Yaohai District Jingcheng Department Store (individual Business) (defendant); Nanjing Zestful International Trade Co., Ltd. (defendant); Guangzhou Hengyu Technology Co., Ltd. (defendant); Huaibei Xuanze Trading Co., Ltd. (defendant); Ningbo Neworiental Manufactory & Trading Co., Ltd. (defendant); Quanzhou Fengze District Haotong Trading Co., Ltd. (defendant); Shenzhen New Jiacheng Trading Co., Ltd (defendant); Honggu Tan District Hang Weige Online Shop (Individual Business) (defendant); Shenzhen Migaga Watch And Jewelry Company Limited (defendant); Guangzhou Viewray Watch Co., Ltd. (defendant); Foshan Matten Watch Co., Ltd. (defendant); Guangzhou Baiyun District Shijing Street Sanma Trading Firm(individual Business) (defendant); Guangzhou JCY Trade Co., Ltd. (defendant); Maanshan Minghuang Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd. (defendant); Yiwu Gt Accessories Co.,ltd (defendant); Yiwu Market Union Co., Ltd. (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-03-05T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictCopyright· 1:26-cv-047501dBrito v. Music GroupRusty Brito sues Universal Music Corporation and affiliates for copyright infringement in federal court.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementRusty Brito (plaintiff); Universal Music Corporation (defendant); Songs of Universal, Inc. (defendant); Universal Music Group (defendant)🎬 Entertainment🎵 MusicUniversalUniversal Musicfiled 2026-06-05T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- NewtxedDistrictPatent· 2:26-cv-009124dMultimedia Technologies Pte Ltd v. Walmart IncMultimedia Technologies is suing Walmart for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The lawsuit centers on an unidentified patent technology. The case turns on whether Walmart's products or services infringe Multimedia Technologies' patent rights.AI15:1126 Patent InfringementMultimedia Technologies Pte Ltd (plaintiff); Walmart Inc (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecacdDistrictCopyright· 2:25-cv-027573dThibault Mauvilain v. Flynet Pictures, LLCPhotographer Thibault Mauvilain sues Flynet Pictures and others for copyright infringement over image rights.AI17:101 Copyright InfringementJoseph Mehdi (plaintiff); Stephane Kyndt (plaintiff); Michel Boutefeu (plaintiff); Robert Christian Wolf (plaintiff); Jeremy Duplaquet (plaintiff); Henri Mazari (plaintiff); Thibault Mauvilain (plaintiff); Getty Images US, Inc. (defendant); Getty Images Holdings, Inc. (defendant); Shutterstock, Inc. (defendant); BackGrid USA, Inc. (defendant); Backgrid Inc. (defendant); FameFlynet Inc. (defendant); Flynet Pictures, LLC (defendant); Ken Korea (mediator (adr panel))🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-03-28T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-08T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: defendantnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:25-cv-099104dGoldman v. Vox Media, LLCJustin Goldman sues Vox Media for copyright infringement over allegedly unauthorized use of his work.AI28:1441cp Removal- CopyrightJustin Goldman (plaintiff); Vox Media, LLC (defendant)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-11-26T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecandDistrictCopyright· 4:22-cv-024644dRearden LLC v. TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp.Rearden sues Disney and Lucasfilm for copyright infringement over motion capture technology in Star Wars films.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementRearden Mova LLC (plaintiff); Rearden LLC (plaintiff); Disney Studio Production Services Co., LLC (defendant); Lucasfilm, Ltd, LLC (defendant); MVL Film Finance LLC (defendant); Marvel Studios, LLC (defendant); Walt Disney Pictures (defendant); Disney Content Services Co., Inc. (defendant); TWDC Enterprises 18 Corp. (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentWalt DisneyDisneyMarvelLucasfilmfiled 2022-04-21T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ClosedPress: defendantcacdDistrictPatent· 8:18-cv-015804dUniversal Electronics Inc. v. Roku, Inc.Universal Electronics sues Roku for patent infringement over remote control technology.AI35:271 Patent InfringementUniversal Electronics Inc. (plaintiff); Roku, Inc. (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentUniversalRokufiled 2018-09-05T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecacdDistrictTrademark· 2:23-cv-080054dSajahtera, Inc. v. Kitross Apparel Los Angeles, LLCSajahtera, Inc. is suing Kitross Apparel Los Angeles, LLC for trademark infringement in federal court. The case involves allegations that Kitross used or registered a mark confusingly similar to Sajahtera's trademark, potentially on apparel or related goods. The outcome will determine whether Kitross must stop using the disputed mark and may result in damages.AI15:1114 Trademark InfringementSajahtera, Inc. (plaintiff); Does (defendant); Kitross Apparel Los Angeles, LLC (defendant); Gail M Title (mediator (adr panel))🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2023-09-25T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffnysdDistrictCopyright· 1:26-cv-053204dRichner Communications, Inc. v. Microsoft CorporationMajor newspaper publishers including Wick Communications, WEHCO Newspapers, and Straus Media are suing OpenAI and Microsoft for copyright infringement, alleging the companies used their news articles without permission to train AI models. The publishers claim their copyrighted content was scraped and used to build ChatGPT and other generative AI systems without compensation or consent.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementWick Communications (plaintiff); White Mountain Publishing LLC (plaintiff); WEHCO Newspapers, Inc. (plaintiff); Straus Newspapers, Inc. (plaintiff); Straus Media-Manhattan, LLC (plaintiff); Shaw Family Holdings, Inc. (plaintiff); Sentinel Media Co., Inc. (plaintiff); Rye Media Partners LLC (plaintiff); Rust Publishing NE, LC (plaintiff); OpenAI Group PBC (defendant); OpenAI Foundation (defendant); OpenAI Holdings, LLC (defendant); OAI Corporation, LLC (defendant); OpenAI Global, LLC (defendant); OpenAI OpCo, LLC (defendant); OpenAI, LLC (defendant); OpenAI GP, LLC (defendant); OpenAI LP (defendant); OpenAI, Inc. (defendant); Microsoft Corporation (defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechMicrosoftOpenAIfiled 2026-06-24T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivecacdDistrictCopyright· 2:25-cv-052754dDisney Enterprises Inc. v. Midjourney Inc.Disney and major studios sue Midjourney for copyright infringement over AI-generated images trained on copyrighted works.AI17:501 Copyright InfringementThe Cartoon Network, Inc. (plaintiff); Turner Entertainment Co. (plaintiff); Hanna-Barbera Productions, Inc. (plaintiff); DC Comics (plaintiff); Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (plaintiff); DreamWorks Animation L.L.C. (plaintiff); Universal City Studios Productions LLLP (plaintiff); Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation (plaintiff); Lucasfilm Ltd. LLC (plaintiff); MVL Film Finance LLC (plaintiff); Marvel Characters Inc. (plaintiff); Disney Enterprises Inc. (plaintiff); Midjourney Inc. (defendant)🎬 EntertainmentDisneyMarvelLucasfilmWarner BrosDC ComicsUniversalDreamWorksfiled 2025-06-11T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivenysdDistrictPatent· 1:18-cv-030254dSportvision, Inc v. MLB Advanced Media L.P.Sportvision sues MLB Advanced Media and others for patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation involving sports tracking technology.AI18:1836(b) Civil Action to Protect Trade SecretsSportsMedia Technology Corporation (plaintiff); Sportvision, Inc (plaintiff); MLB Advanced Media L.P. (defendant); ChyronHego Corp. (interested party); Peter Morrone (interested party); ChyronHego Parent Corp. (interested party); Hawk-eye Innovations North America (interested party); TrackMan, Inc. (interested party)🎬 Entertainment🏆 SportsMLBfiled 2018-04-05T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivePress: plaintiffcandDistrictCopyright· 3:23-cv-034174dKadrey v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Authors sue Meta for copyright infringement, claiming the company used their works to train AI models without permission.AI17:504 Copyright InfringementCognella, Inc. (plaintiff); Daring Greatly Corporation (plaintiff); BCP Literary, Inc. (plaintiff); Eleven Eleven O' Clock Corporation (plaintiff); Christopher Farnsworth (plaintiff); Lysa TerKeurst (plaintiff); Junot Diaz (plaintiff); John Blase (plaintiff); Tsh Oxenreider (plaintiff); Michael Sullivan (miscellaneous); Strike 3 Holdings, LLC (miscellaneous); Entrepreneur Media LLC (movant); Joseph Farris (miscellaneous); OpenAI OpCo, L.L.C. (miscellaneous); HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C. (movant); Association of American Publishers (amicus); The Copyright Alliance (amicus); The International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers (amicus); Electronic Frontier Foundation (amicus); Amici IP Law Professors (amicus)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechMetaOpenAIfiled 2023-07-07T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivetxedDistrictPatent· 2:25-cv-009564dMonument Peak Ventures, LLC v. Arashi Vision Inc. d/b/a Insta360Monument Peak Ventures is suing Arashi Vision, which operates as Insta360, for patent infringement in Texas federal court. The case involves a patent dispute, likely related to Insta360's 360-degree camera or imaging technology. Monument Peak Ventures claims Arashi Vision's products infringe one or more of its patents.AI35:271 Patent InfringementMonument Peak Ventures, LLC (plaintiff); Arashi Vision Inc. d/b/a Insta360 (defendant); Jack Wesley Hill (mediator)🎬 Entertainmentfiled 2025-09-16T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z
- ActivetxedDistrictPatent· 2:26-cv-003774dQuanteFi Corporation v. Hewlett Packard Enterprise CompanyQuanteFi Corporation is suing Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company and multiple Comcast entities for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on a patent owned by QuanteFi, though the specific patent number and technology are not identified in the available case documents. The case was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas.AI35:271 Patent InfringementQuanteFi Corporation (plaintiff); Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company (defendant); Comcast of Houston, LLC (consol defendant); Comcast Cable Communications Management, LLC (consol defendant); Comcast Corp. (consol defendant); Comcast Cable Communications, LLC, d/b/a Xfinity, (consol defendant)🎬 Entertainment💻 TechComcastComcast Cablefiled 2026-05-06T00:00:00.000Z · last filing 2026-10-07T00:00:00.000Z