The Webb Law Firm

1. Openfor defendantTXED2026-10-21
   Amide Beverage Company, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.

   Amide Beverage Company sued Amazon, Walmart, Target, Costco, and major pharmacy and convenience store chains for allegedly infringing its patent on beverage technology or formulation. The lawsuit targets the defendants' sale of competing products, with Amazon serving as the lead defendant. The case involves a utility patent violation under 35 U.S.C. § 271 in federal court in Texas.

2. OpenTXED2026-10-21
   In Re: Valtrus Innovations Ltd

   Valtrus Innovations Ltd is suing multiple data center and infrastructure companies—including Ark Data Centers, TRG Datacenters, 365 Data Center Services, Compass Datacenters, Cogent Communications, and others—for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The specific patent at issue is not identified in the case record, but the lawsuit alleges these defendants unlawfully used Valtrus's patented technology.

3. Openfor defendantTXED2026-09-11
   Valtrus Innovations Ltd v. 365 Data Centers Holdings LLC

   Valtrus Innovations is suing 365 Data Centers Holdings and related entities for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The lawsuit targets the defendants' data center operations, alleging they infringe Valtrus's patented technology. Key Patent Innovations is also named as a party to the dispute.

4. Closedfor plaintiffN.D. Cal.2017-12-22
   Kelora Systems, LLC v. Target Corporation

   Kelora Systems and nine major e-commerce retailers—including Amazon, Newegg, and Office Depot—sued Target and nine other online retailers for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271. The specific patent at issue is not identified in the case record, but the dispute centers on technology or methods used in online retail operations.

5. ClosedTXED2016-05-16
   Genaville LLC v. AT&T Inc.

   The Men's Wearhouse and Genaville LLC are suing seventeen retailers and e-commerce companies, including Home Depot, L.L. Bean, REI, and Fanatics, for patent infringement. The case involves a utility patent (35 U.S.C. § 271), though the specific patent and technology aren't detailed in the court record. Net-A-Porter has filed a counterclaim.

Counsel sourced from public CourtListener docket records; firm names are normalized across spellings and office locations. Appearing for a party is not an endorsement of any position.