Down to Earth Organics, LLC v. Scott

Summary

Down to Earth Organics sues Travis Scott and associated companies for trademark infringement over brand rights.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

15:44 Trademark Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Down to Earth Organics, LLC (plaintiff) Travis Scott (defendant) LaFlame Enterprises, Inc. (adr provider) Cactus Jack Publishing, LLC (adr provider)

Docket entries

1. #712026-06-29

   Taxation of Costs

2. #702026-05-27

   Bill of Costs Notice of Taxation

3. #692026-04-30

   OPINION AND ORDER re: 66 MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by Cactus Jack Publishing, LLC, Travis Scott, LaFlame Enterprises, Inc.. For the foregoing reasons, the Court denies Defendants' motion for attorneys' fees. T his decision is without prejudice to Defendants filing any motion for costs pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54, or Local Rule 54.1. Cf. 10 CHARLES ALAN WRIGHT & ARTHUR R. MILLER, FEDERAL PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE § 2666 (4th ed. 2025) (distinguishing costs, fees, and expenses). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the motion at Docket Number 66. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 4/30/2026) (ks)

4. #682025-12-22

   Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion

5. #672025-12-16

   Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Motion

6. #662025-11-25

   Attorney Fees

7. #652025-11-17

   Memo Endorsement AND ~Util - Set Deadlines

8. #642025-11-13

   Letter

9. #632025-11-12

   Letter

10. #622025-11-06

    CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 61 Order on Motion to Dismiss. in favor of Cactus Jack Publishing, LLC, John Does 1-10 Inclusive, LaFlame Enterprises, Inc., Travis Scott against Down to Earth Organics, LLC. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREE D: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated November 6, 2025, Defendants will not be prejudiced by the Court granting Plaintiffs motion to dismiss this case with prejudice. The Court therefore grants Plaintiffs motion under Rule 41(a)(2) and dismisses Plaintiff's Complaint with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Tammi M Hellwig on 11/6/2025) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (nd)

11. 2025-07-24

    Telephone Conference

12. 2025-07-17

    Telephone Conference

13. 2025-07-07

    Notice to Attorney to Re-File Document - PDF Error

14. 2025-04-16

    Telephone Conference

15. 2025-02-07

    Telephone Conference

16. 2025-01-13

    Order

17. 2024-09-03

    Notice to Attorney Regarding Party Modification

18. 2024-09-03

    Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Civil Cover Sheet

19. 2024-09-03

    Notice to Attorney Regarding Deficient Pleading

20. 2024-09-03

    Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.