Shenzhen Peishi Advertising Media Co. Ltd. v. Envoylei
Summary
Shenzhen Peishi Advertising Media sues Envoylei for patent infringement in federal court.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Bayramoglu Law Offices LLCJoseph Wendell Droter, Katherine Marilyn Kuhn
- Bayramoglu Law OfficesNazly Aileen Bayramoglu
- Bayramoglu Law Offices LlcWilliam Brees
- Court
- ILND
- Docket no.
- 1:26-cv-00392
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Mary M. Rowland
- Filed
- 2026-01-13
- Last filing
- 2026-08-07
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Shenzhen Peishi Advertising Media Co. Ltd. (plaintiff) Envoylei (defendant)
Docket entries
- #712026-08-21
Order
- #702026-08-13
Order
- #692026-08-11
Order on Motion for Release of Bond Obligation
- #672026-08-07
Release of Bond Obligation
- #662026-08-07
Order on Motion to Set Aside Default
- #612026-06-17
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer
- #572026-06-16
Extension of Time to File Answer
- #562026-06-04
Order
- #532026-06-01
Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney
- #522026-05-29
Withdraw as Attorney
- #512026-05-29
Order on Motion for Leave to File
- #492026-05-28
Leave to File Document
- #482026-05-26
Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney
- #452026-05-21
Substitute Attorney
- #402026-04-22
Set Aside Default
- #362026-04-03
Default Judgment
- #352026-04-03
Order on Motion for Default Judgment
- #322026-03-17
Default Judgment
- 2026-01-14
CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Mary M. Rowland. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Keri L. Holleb Hotaling. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 1). (jks, )
- 2026-01-14
CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (jks, )
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.