Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc. v. Parallel Domain, Inc.

Summary

AI Industry Association sues Parallel Domain and Osaro for patent infringement.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc. (plaintiff) Parallel Domain, Inc. (defendant) Osaro, Inc. (miscellaneous)

Docket entries

1. #472026-07-01

   Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney

2. #462026-06-30

   Substitute Firm

3. #452026-06-04

   ORDER signed on 6/4/2026 by Judge Peter H. Kang granting (56) Motion to Substitute Attorney. (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2026) (Entered: 06/04/2026)

4. #442026-06-03

   MOTION to Substitute Attorney filed by Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc.. (Ramachandran, Vivek) (Filed on 6/3/2026) Modified on 6/4/2026 (jaf, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 06/03/2026)

5. #432026-05-11

   [IN-CHAMBERS TEXT ONLY ORDER]: The Court has broad discretion to manage its docket efficiently. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992). After reviewing the Parties' Joint Status Report, [-7170 case, Dkt. 47 ], and in light of the Parties' positions and disagreements on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court DENIES Fanuc's request to partially join in the Osaro Motion to Dismiss.Fanuc's deadline to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 30 days from the date the Court issues an Order resolving the pending Motion to Dismiss.The motion to stay the Fanuc case is DENIED. The Court reiterates that the Fanuc case is deemed related to the Osaro and Parallel cases. The Court expects all Parties to work collaboratively to rationally coordinate and manage their activities in all the cases consistent with their obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P 1, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and this Court's Civil Standing Order.Signed by Juge Peter H. Kang on May 11, 2026. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (phklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2026) (Entered: 05/11/2026)

6. 2026-05-11

   Order

7. #422026-03-19

   Transcript of Proceedings held on 02/17/26, before Judge Peter Kang. Court Reporter/Transcriber Echo Reporting, Inc., telephone number echoreporting@yahoo.com. Tape Number: 1:37 - 2:58. Per General Order No. 59 and Judicial Conference policy, this transcript may be viewed only at the Clerk's Office public terminal or may be purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber until the deadline for the Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Any Notice of Intent to Request Redaction, if required, is due no later than 5 business days from date of this filing. Redaction Request due 4/9/2026. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/20/2026. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/17/2026. (Jauregui, Tara) (Filed on 3/19/2026) (Entered: 03/19/2026)

8. #412026-02-18

   Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang: Motion Hearing held on 2/17/2026 re 31 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint filed by Parallel Domain, Inc. Discussion held. Matter Submitted. Court to issue written order. Liberty Recording Time: 1:37pm-2:58pm (1 h 21m). Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc: Michael Newell. Osaro, Inc: Bethany Bengfort. Parallel Domain: Timothy Saulsbury. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 2/18/2026) (Entered: 02/18/2026)

9. 2026-02-18

   Motion Hearing

10. #402026-02-04

    [IN-CHAMBERS TEXT ONLY ORDER]: The undersigned has reviewed Plaintiff's counsel's request for remote appearance at the motion hearing set for February 17, 2026. [Dkt. 38 ]. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate sufficient good cause to allow for the exception of remote appearance. Plaintiff selected this venue, and Plaintiff's counsel's residence outside this federal judicial district is not, alone, sufficient cause. It's up to each Party to select which of its counsel of record will appear at a hearing, unless ordered otherwise (including the Court's requirement that lead trial counsel appear at certain hearings or conferences). In that regard, the Court reminds counsel of the first paragraph of Section VII(D) and of Section XII of the Court's Civil Standing Order. For these reasons, the request is DENIED. Signed by Judge Peter H. Kang on February 4, 2026. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (phklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/4/2026) (Entered: 02/04/2026)

11. 2026-02-04

    Order on Administrative Motion per Civil Local Rule 7-11

12. #392026-02-03

    ORDER signed on 2/3/2026 by Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang granting 37 Motion for Pro Hac Vice re. Michael Newell. (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2026) (Entered: 02/03/2026)

13. 2025-12-31

    Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

14. 2025-12-22

    Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

15. 2025-10-24

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

16. 2025-10-23

    Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

17. 2025-09-25

    Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination

18. 2025-09-25

    Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney

19. 2025-09-24

    Clerk's Notice re: Consent or Declination

20. 2025-09-09

    ~Util - Case Assigned by Intake

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.