Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc. v. Fanuc America Corporation
Summary
Artificial Intelligence Industry Association sues Fanuc America for allegedly infringing its patented technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2026-05-11)
Counsel of record
- Fry Law CorporationChristopher John Fry
- Independent counselVivek Ramachandran
- Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLPBarbara Nora Barath
- Coblentz Patch Duffy and Bass LLPChristopher James Wiener
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Docket no.
- 3:26-cv-00860
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2026-01-27
- Last filing
- 2026-07-01
Cause
35:145 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc. (plaintiff) Fanuc America Corporation (defendant)
Docket entries
- #262026-07-01
Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney
- #252026-06-30
Substitute Firm
- #242026-06-03
NOTICE of Appearance filed by Vivek Ramachandran on behalf of Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc. (Ramachandran, Vivek) (Filed on 6/3/2026) (Entered: 06/03/2026)
- 2026-06-03
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
- #232026-05-11
[IN-CHAMBERS TEXT ONLY ORDER]: The Court has broad discretion to manage its docket efficiently. See Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 607 (9th Cir. 1992). After reviewing the Parties' Joint Status Report, [-7170 case, Dkt. 47 ], and in light of the Parties' positions and disagreements on the Motion to Dismiss, the Court DENIES Fanuc's request to partially join in the Osaro Motion to Dismiss.Fanuc's deadline to Answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 30 days from the date the Court issues an Order resolving the pending Motion to Dismiss.The motion to stay the Fanuc case is DENIED. The Court reiterates that the Fanuc case is deemed related to the Osaro and Parallel cases. The Court expects all Parties to work collaboratively to rationally coordinate and manage their activities in all the cases consistent with their obligations under Fed. R. Civ. P 1, Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, and this Court's Civil Standing Order.Signed by Juge Peter H. Kang on May 11, 2026. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (phklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/11/2026) (Entered: 05/11/2026)
- 2026-05-11
Order
- #222026-04-17
STIPULATION to Extend Time for FANUC America Corporation to Respond to Complaint filed by Fanuc America Corporation. (Wiener, Christopher) (Filed on 4/17/2026) Modified on 4/17/2026 (jml, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 04/17/2026)
- #212026-03-09
NOTICE of Appearance filed by Christopher James Wiener on behalf of Fanuc America Corporation (Wiener, Christopher) (Filed on 3/9/2026) (Entered: 03/09/2026)
- 2026-03-09
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
- #202026-03-03
Order re. Initial Coordination with Other Related Cases. Joint Case Management Status Report due on or before April 3, 2026. Signed by Judge Peter H. Kang on 3/3/2026. (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2026)
- #192026-02-27
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE IT IS ORDERED that this case is directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers no longer assigned to the case. Counsel are instructed that all future filings shall bear the updated judicial initials immediately after the case number. Counsel are reminded to verify the location of the judge on the court website. All hearing and trial dates presently scheduled are vacated. However, existing briefing schedules for motions remain unchanged. Motions must be renoticed for hearing before the judge to whom the case has been reassigned, but the renoticing of the hearing does not affect the prior briefing schedule. Other deadlines such as those for ADR compliance and discovery cutoff also remain unchanged. Mark B. Busby Clerk, United States District Court (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (amf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2026) (Entered: 02/27/2026)
- 2026-02-27
Case Assigned/Reassigned
- #182026-02-25
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Peter H. Kang for all purposes including trial and entry of judgment. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/25/2026. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2026) (Entered: 02/26/2026)
- #172026-02-24
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Artificial Intelligence Industry Association, Inc... (Fry, Christopher) (Filed on 2/24/2026) (Entered: 02/24/2026)
- #162026-02-23
CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Fanuc America Corporation.. (Barath, Barbara) (Filed on 2/23/2026) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
- #152026-02-23
STIPULATION re 1 Complaint [Civil L.R. 6-1 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint] filed by Fanuc America Corporation. (Barath, Barbara) (Filed on 2/23/2026) (Entered: 02/23/2026)
- #142026-02-20
ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO INFORM COURT WHETHER THEY CONSENT TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR ALL PURPOSES. Consent/Declination due by 2/23/2026. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 2/20/2026. (eac, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2026) (Entered: 02/20/2026)
- 2026-02-19
Notice of Appearance/Substitution/Change/Withdrawal of Attorney
- 2026-02-10
Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Teleconference Zoom
- 2026-01-27
~Util - Case Assigned by Intake
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.