Zoom North America, LLC v. Office Sales Direct, Inc.

Summary

Zoom North America sues Office Sales Direct and Isaac Fried for trademark infringement over the Zoom brand.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

15:1051 Trademark Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Isaac Fried Office Sales Direct, Inc. Zoom North America, LLC

Docket entries

1. #122026-06-12

   Notice of Report Patent or Trademark AO120

2. 2026-06-08

   Order Dismissing Case

3. #112025-09-19

   Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

4. #102025-09-18

   Certificate of Service

5. 2025-09-17

   Scheduling Order

6. #92025-07-03

   Summons Returned Unexecuted

7. #82025-07-03

   Summons Returned Unexecuted

8. #72025-07-03

   Summons Returned Unexecuted

9. #62025-07-03

   Summons Returned Executed

10. #52025-04-04

    Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint) (SMF) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

11. #42025-04-04

    Summons Issued as to Isaac Fried, Office Sales Direct, Inc.. (SMF) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

12. #32025-04-04

    Clerks Notice Re: Consent. A magistrate judge has been assigned as the presiding judge in this case as part of a Pilot Program, governed by EDNY Administrative Order 2023-23. In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent, the assigned Magistrate Judge is available to conduct all proceedings in this action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to this Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form is also available here: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. Any party may withhold its consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. Unless all parties consent to the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction by the deadline set forth in the Administrative Order 2023-23, a District Judge will be assigned to the case. The parties are directed to review the terms of Administrative Order 2023-23 and other materials related to the Pilot Program on the Courts website: https://www.nyed.uscourts.gov/edny-direct-assignment-pilot-program. (SMF) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

13. #22025-04-04

    This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (SMF) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

14. #12025-04-04

    COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 405, receipt number ANYEDC-18921029 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Zoom North America, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Proposed Summons, # 3 Proposed Summons) (Schroeder, Robert) (Entered: 04/04/2025)

15. 2025-04-04

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

16. 2025-04-04

    Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (SMF)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.