Activision Publishing, Inc. v. Ryan Rothholz
Summary
Activision Publishing sues Ryan Rothholz and others for copyright infringement.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 2P · 0D · 1N (3 articles)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
2 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 1 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 0 defendant · 1 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- ‘Call of Duty’ maker goes to war with ‘parasitic’ cheat developers in L.A. federal courtLos Angeles Times · 2025-07-25
- Call of Duty Gamers Accused of Selling 'Game Hacks,' Lawsuit SaysLaw.com · 2025-05-13
None classified yet.
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Mitchell Silberberg and Knupp LLPAriana Addo-Yobo, Hannah G. Shepherd, Marc Ellis Mayer +1 more
- Mitchel Silberberg and Knupp LLPMarissa B. Lewis
- Independent counselRyan Rothholz
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Docket no.
- 2:25-cv-04075
- Nature of suit
- Copyright
- Judge
- Sherilyn Peace Garnett
- Filed
- 2025-05-07
- Last filing
- 2026-09-03
Cause
17:101 Copyright Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Does Doe 2 Doe 1 Jordan Newcombe Boothey Collin Gyetvai Ryan Rothholz Activision Publishing, Inc.
Docket entries
- #682026-07-08
No description on file
- #672026-07-02
No description on file
- #662026-06-30
No description on file
- 2026-06-26
No description on file
- #632026-06-24
No description on file
- 2026-06-24
No description on file
- #622026-06-16
No description on file
- 2026-06-03
No description on file
- #602026-06-02
No description on file
- #592026-06-02
No description on file
- #582026-06-02
No description on file
- 2026-05-08
No description on file
- #562026-05-05
No description on file
- #552026-04-30
No description on file
- #542026-03-31
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge Sherilyn Peace Garnett: The Court has reviewed the Joint Rule 26(f) Report submitted by the parties and determines that an in-person Scheduling Conference is unnecessary. Accordingly, the Court VACATES the April 1, 2026, Scheduling Conference. Trial Order to be issued. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pg) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 03/31/2026)
- 2026-03-31
No description on file
- #532026-03-18
JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 3-5 days, filed by Plaintiff Activision Publishing, Inc... (Mayer, Marc) (Entered: 03/18/2026)
- 2025-10-30
No description on file
- 2025-09-05
No description on file
- 2025-08-25
No description on file
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.