TrademarkC.D. Cal.2:25-cv-10802

Shopnomix LLC v. Ad.com Interactive Media Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Pronomix.ai and Shopnomix are suing Ad.com Interactive Media for trademark infringement under the Lanham Act. The plaintiffs allege Ad.com unlawfully used their trademark, likely related to their Pronomix.ai or Shopnomix brands in the digital advertising or e-commerce space. The case centers on whether Ad.com's use creates consumer confusion and damages the plaintiffs' brand rights.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Coverage events: 0P · 1D · 1N (3 articles)

Latest ruling: neutral (2026-06-22)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

0 plaintiff-favorable · 1 defendant-favorable · 2 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 0 plaintiff · 1 defendant · 1 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

None classified yet.

Defendant-favorable

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2026-03-02 · coverage 0P / 1D / 2NDocketFiled 2025-11-112026-06-22 · ruling · favors neutral STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christina T. Shay re Stipulation for Pro…Nov 25Mar 26Jun 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Central District of California
Docket no.
2:25-cv-10802
Nature of suit
Trademark
Judge
Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha
Filed
2025-11-11
Last filing
2026-09-29

Cause

15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Entities in this case

Parties

Pronomix.ai LLC (plaintiff) Shopnomix LLC (plaintiff) Ad.com Interactive Media Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #632026-07-10

    No description on file

  2. #622026-06-26

    No description on file

  3. #612026-06-25

    No description on file

  4. #602026-06-22

    No description on file

  5. #592026-06-22

    STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Christina T. Shay re Stipulation for Protective Order 55 . (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). (mrv)

  6. 2026-06-22

    No description on file

  7. #572026-06-09

    No description on file

  8. #562026-06-09

    No description on file

  9. #552026-06-01

    No description on file

  10. #542026-05-27

    No description on file

  11. #532026-05-18

    No description on file

  12. #522026-05-05

    No description on file

  13. 2026-03-04

    No description on file

  14. 2026-02-02

    No description on file

  15. 2026-01-30

    No description on file

  16. 2026-01-26

    No description on file

  17. 2026-01-09

    No description on file

  18. 2025-12-01

    No description on file

  19. 2025-11-20

    No description on file

  20. 2025-11-14

    No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-30