BridgeNine Corp. v. Apple Inc.
Summary
BridgeNine Corp. sues Apple Inc. for infringing its patent technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Nixon Peabody LLPAndrew Y Choung, Jennifer Hayes, Patrick Ohryn Doyle
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Docket no.
- 2:26-cv-06164
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Rozella A. Oliver
- Filed
- 2026-06-05
- Last filing
- 2026-09-18
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
BridgeNine Corp. (plaintiff) Apple Inc. (defendant)
Docket entries
- #272026-08-21
Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only
- 2026-08-21
Text Only Scheduling Notice
- #262026-08-20
Dismiss Case
- #252026-08-20
Order
- #242026-08-19
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)
- #232026-08-06
Amended Complaint/Petition
- 2026-08-03
Appear Pro Hac Vice
- #212026-07-30
Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64)
- #202026-07-17
Response By Court to Notice of Deficiencies (G-112B) - optional html form
- #182026-07-16
Notice of Deficiency in Electronically filed Pro Hac Vice Application (G-112C) - optional html form
- 2026-07-16
Appear Pro Hac Vice
- #172026-07-14
Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64)
- #162026-07-14
Appear Pro Hac Vice (G-64)
- #152026-07-06
Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties
- #142026-07-06
Extending Time to Answer (30 days or less)
- #132026-06-24
Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only
- #122026-06-24
Initial Order upon Filing of Complaint - form only
- #112026-06-24
Notice of Reassignment (CV-87) of Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program
- #102026-06-24
Proof of Service (subsequent documents)
- 2026-06-24
MJDAP Timely Opt-Out
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.