Roblox Corporation v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint

Roblox sues unnamed defendants for trademark infringement related to counterfeit or infringing uses of Roblox marks.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Deep summary (AI brief of the complaint)

**Plaintiff:** Roblox Corporation (Delaware corporation), San Mateo, CA **Defendant:** Unknown individuals and entities identified on Schedule A to the Complaint **Core allegation:** Defendants are infringing Roblox's federally registered ROBLOX trademarks in connection with video game software, entertainment services, and related goods. Roblox seeks to halt unauthorized use of its marks across multiple international classes. **Asserted IP:** - U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 3,280,422 — ROBLOX (standard characters), Classes 9, 38, 41; registered Aug. 14, 2007; renewed Sep. 11, 2017 - U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 5,466,424 — ROBLOX (stylized, with concentric-square "O" design), Classes 9, 41; registered May 8, 2018 - U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 6,024,416 — ROBLOX (standard characters), Classes 9, 28, 41; registered Mar. 31, 2020 - U.S. Trademark Reg. No. 6,200,694 — ROBLOX (standard characters), Classes 9, 16, 25; registered Nov. 17, 2020 **Relief sought:** Injunctive relief and damages against all Schedule A defendants for trademark infringement under 15…

AI-generated from the filed complaint. Always verify against the original document.

Coverage vs realityAligned

Prior 1P · 2D · 3N (6 articles)→Recent 30d 1P · 0D · 1N (2 articles)

Latest ruling: neutral (2026-06-24)

Press coverage and the latest court ruling tell the same story.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

2 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 4 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 4 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

RBLX 2-DAY DEADLINE ALERT: Roblox Corporation (RBLX) Facing SecurThe National Law Review · 2026-08-16
RBLX DEADLINE ALERT: Roblox Corporation (RBLX) Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead the Roblox Class Action Lawsuit – Company Announcement - FT.comFinancial Times · 2026-07-01

Defendant-favorable

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Boies Schiller Flexner LLPChristopher Tom

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket no.: 1:26-cv-05185
Nature of suit: Trademark
Filed: 2026-06-18
Last filing: 2026-07-09

Cause

15:1051 Trademark Infringement

Entities in this case

Roblox9

Parties

The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A to the Complaint Roblox Corporation

Docket entries

#272026-07-09
No description on file
#262026-07-06
No description on file
#252026-07-02
No description on file
2026-07-02
No description on file
#242026-07-01
No description on file
#232026-06-30
No description on file
2026-06-30
No description on file
#222026-06-29
No description on file
#212026-06-24
MEMO ENDORSED ORDER granting 11 Motion to Seal. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. The Court finds the documents are "judicial documents" to which a high presumption of public access attaches. Mir/is v. Greer, 952 F.3d. 51, 58 (2d Ci r. 2020). "[S]ealing of the documents may be justified only with specific, on-the-record findings that sealing is necessary to preserve higher values and only if the sealing order is narrowly tailored to achieve that aim." Lugosch v. Py ramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 (2d Cir. 2006). In light of the ex parte nature of the relief properly sought by Plaintiff, the Court is satisfied that higher interests overcome the presumption of public access, so as to justify temporary sealing of the documents in question, Olson v. Major League Baseball, 29 F.4th 59, 88 (2d Cir. 2022), subject to the conditions of the temporary restraining order, ECF No. 18. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF No. 11. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 6/24/2026) (ar)
#202026-06-24
No description on file
#192026-06-24
No description on file
#182026-06-24
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER: Based on the foregoing findings of fact and conclusions of law, hereby GRANTED and it is ORDERED as follows: As sufficient cause has been shown, Defendants are temporarily enjoined and restrained from engaging in any of the following conduct, pending the return date of the Application as referenced below: Using the ROBLOX Trademarks or any reproductions, counterfeit copies, or colorable imi tations thereof in any manner in connection with the distribution, marketing, advertising, offering for sale, or sale of any Counterfeit Products; As further set forth in this Order. Plaintiff shall deposit with the Court Five Thousand Dollar s ($5,000.00), either by case, company check, cashier's check, or surety bond, as security, which amount was determined adequate for the payment of such damages as any person may be entitled to recover as a result of a wrongful restrain t hereunder. As further set forth in this Order. Any Defendants that are subject to this Order may appear and move to dissolve or modify the Order on two (2) days' notice to Plaintiff or on shorter notice as set by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a hearing shall be held on July 8, 2026 at 11 a.m. which Plaintiff may present its arguments in support of its request for issuance of a preliminary injunction. At such time, any Defendants may also be heard as to opposit ion to Plaintiff's Application. The conference will be held via Microsoft Teams. The parties should dial in by calling (646) 453-4442 and entering the Phone Conference ID: 848 783 847, followed by the pound ( #) sign. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that opposing papers, if any, shall be filed on or before July 3, 2026. This Temporary Restraining Order without notice is entered on June 24, 2026, and shall remain effect for fourteen (14) days. (Signed by Judge Dale E. Ho on 6/24/2026) ( Responses due by 7/3/2026, Status Conference set for 7/8/2026 at 11:00 AM before Judge Dale E. Ho.) (ks) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
#172026-06-22
No description on file
#162026-06-22
No description on file
#152026-06-22
No description on file
#142026-06-22
No description on file
2026-06-22
No description on file
2026-06-22
No description on file
#132026-06-18
PROPOSED ORDER. Document filed by Roblox Corporation. Related Document Number: 12 ..(Tom, Christopher) Proposed Order to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. (Entered: 06/18/2026)
#122026-06-18
MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages . Document filed by Roblox Corporation..(Tom, Christopher) (Entered: 06/18/2026)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-13

Summary