The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. v. Adobe Inc.
Summary
The Foundry Visionmongers sues Adobe for trademark infringement over disputed branding rights.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 1P · 0D · 1N (5 articles)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
1 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 4 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant · 1 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- Adobe Can’t Shake Trademark Suit Over Firefly Foundry AI ModelsBloomberg Law News · 2026-09-08
None classified yet.
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Duane Morris LLPBrianna M. Vinci, Jennifer McGuone Lantz, Mark C Comtois +2 more
- Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLPDori Ann Hanswirth, Joseph Richard Farris, Oscar Daniel Ramallo
- Arnold & Porter Kate ScholerHafeez Khan
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Docket no.
- 5:26-cv-02121
- Nature of suit
- Trademark
- Judge
- Noel Wise
- Filed
- 2026-03-11
- Last filing
- 2026-09-25
Cause
15:1121 Trademark Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. (plaintiff) Adobe Inc. (defendant)
Docket entries
- 2026-07-09
No description on file
- 2026-07-09
No description on file
- #492026-07-07
No description on file
- #482026-06-30
No description on file
- 2026-06-22
No description on file
- #462026-06-19
No description on file
- #452026-06-12
No description on file
- #442026-06-09
No description on file
- #432026-06-09
No description on file
- #422026-06-09
No description on file
- 2026-05-27
No description on file
- 2026-03-25
No description on file
- 2026-03-24
No description on file
- 2026-03-24
No description on file
- 2026-03-24
*** ERRONEOUSLY E-FILED, DISREGARD*** DIRECT MEMBER CASE OPENED: RE MDL 23-3084, Roe CL 294 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al, case opened in California Northern District as 3:26-cv-02511-CRB cc: JPMDL (far, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/24/2026) Modified on 3/24/2026 (far, COURT STAFF).
- 2026-03-23
No description on file
- 2026-03-23
No description on file
- 2026-03-12
No description on file
- 2026-03-12
No description on file
- 2026-03-12
Electronic filing error. NOTICE REGARDING THE FILING OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT/TRADEMARK. The provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 290 and/or 15 U.S.C. § 1116 require the submission of a report to the Patent/Trademark. Please e-file a completed Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action or Appeal Regarding a Patent/Trademark form AO-120 using the event Civil Events Other Filings Other Documents Patent/Trademark, within five days of this notice. Re: 1 Complaint, filed by The Foundry Visionmongers Ltd. (jml, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2026)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.