Adaptix, Inc. v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.
Summary
Adaptix, Inc. and three major wireless carriers—Sprint Spectrum, AT&T Mobility, and Cellco Partnership—sued Alcatel-Lucent USA and AT&T, Inc. for patent infringement. The lawsuit involves a patent related to wireless technology, though the specific patent number and technical details are not disclosed in the case record.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2014-10-28)
Counsel of record
- Baker Botts LLP - DallasDouglas Mark Kubehl, Jeffery Scott Becker
- Bruster PLLCAnthony Kyle Bruster, Shawn A. Latchford
- Prince Lobel Tye LLP - BostonDaniel James McGonagle, Michael James Ercolini
- Nelson Bumgardner Conroy PC - Fort WorthEdward R Nelson , III
- Nelson Bumgardner PCMeredith Joelle Fitzpatrick
- Noteware Law Firm PC - TylerDaniel Alan Noteware , Jr.
- PO Box 1231Johnny Ward , Jr
- Ramey & FlockWalter Thomas Henson
- The Chin Law Firm, PLLCEdward K Chin
- Erise IP, PA - Overland ParkAdam Prescot Seitz
- Erise, IP, PA - ColoradoPaul Redmond Hart
- Hinckley Allen & Snyder - BostonJason Clarence Williams
- James J. FosterJames J. Foster
- McCarter & English, LLP BostonThomas Robert Fulford
- Potter Minton, a Professional CorporationJohn Frederick Bufe
- Yarbrough Wilcox, PLLCHerbert A Yarbrough , III
- Findlay Craft PCDebra Elaine Gunter
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 6:12-cv-00022
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2012-01-13
- Last filing
- 2017-02-22
- Terminated
- 2016-03-30
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Adaptix, Inc. (plaintiff) Sprint Spectrum L.P. (plaintiff) AT&T Mobility LLC (plaintiff) Cellco Partnership (plaintiff) Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. (defendant) AT&T, Inc. (defendant) Harlan Martin (mediator) David Keyzer (technical advisor)
Docket entries
- 2015-06-09
NOTICE OF FILED IN ERROR, PER COURT REPORTER, re 372 Sealed Transcript. PLEASE IGNORE. COURT REPORTER WILL REFILE. (sm, )
- 2015-05-28
NOTICE OF MOTION HEARING SET BEFORE U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CAROLINE M. CRAVEN FOR 06/02/15 AT 10:30 WILL BE HELD IN JUDGE MICHAEL SCHNEIDER'S COURTROOM 102, TYLER, TX. Location only change. (lfs, )
- 2014-10-28
NOTICE of DEFICIENCY regarding the #282 Motion to continue submitted by AT&T Mobility LLC, Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc.. No certificate of conference was included. Correction should be made by 1 business day and refiled. Motion is now TERMINATED. (sm, )
- 2014-10-15
AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 227 Opposed SEALED MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Answer, 228 Opposed MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO P.R. 3-6(B) : Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2014 10:00 AM in Tyler Courtroom 102 (Judge Schneider's courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven. PARTIES WILL BE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 45 MINUTES PER SIDE. With regard to the other pending motions of which the Court is aware, the Court, in its discretion, may set hearings on these motions at a later date. (COURTROOM CHANGE ONLY) (lfs, )
- 2014-09-30
NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 227 Opposed SEALED MOTION for Leave to File an Amended Answer, 228 Opposed MOTION PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS PURSUANT TO P.R. 3-6(B) : Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2014 10:00 AM in Tyler Courthouse (Judge Steger's courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven. PARTIES WILL BE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 45 MINUTES PER SIDE. With regard to the other pending motions of which the Court is aware, the Court, in its discretion, may set hearings on these motions at a later date.(lfs, )
- 2014-08-28
***FILED IN ERROR, WRONG EVENT USED, ATTY MUST REFILE. Document # 244, Stipulation. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (sm, )
- 2014-05-16
***FILED IN ERROR PER ATTORNEY. Document # 180, Motion to Expedite. PLEASE IGNORE.*** (gsg)
- 2014-02-12
NOTICE of Hearing TIME CHANGE Markman Hearing REset for 2/13/2014 01:00 PM in Tyler Courthouse (Judge Steger courtroom) before Magistrate Judge Caroline Craven. (lfs, )
- 2014-01-16
NOTICE FROM CLERK re 122 Claim Construction Brief and 128 Claim Construction Brief. These entries have been modified, per Judge, to reflect that the entries are RESPONSIVE claim construction briefs instead of just briefs. (sm, )
- 2013-10-09
NOTICE of DEFICIENCY regarding the #102 Sealed Response, along with #103 and 104 attachments related to document, submitted by Adaptix, Inc.. Exhibits in Sealed Response were not identified with specificity per local rules. Correction should be made by 1 business day and refiled. (sm, )
- 2013-09-25
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge John D. Love: Hotline Conference held on 9/25/2013. (Court - Reporter Digital Recording.) (mjm, )
- 2012-08-06
NOTICE of Deficiency regarding the joint motion, entry 62 submitted. No certificate of conference. See entry 63 for corrected filing. (gsg)
- 2012-06-19
CASE REFERRED to Mediator. Harlan Martin is appointed as Mediator in this cause. (mll, ) Modified on 6/26/2012 (mll, ).
- 2012-06-19
Deadlines set per 44 Docket Control Order: Mediation Completion due by 6/26/2013. Judge Harlan Martin is appointed as Mediator in this cause. Jury Selection set for 10/6/2014 09:00AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Jury Trial set for 10/14/2014 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Markman Hearing set for 6/27/2013 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. Pretrial Conference set for 9/25/2014 09:00 AM before Judge Leonard Davis. (mll, ) Modified on 6/26/2012 (mll, ).
- 2012-03-09
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 14 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Spectrum L.P. to 3/26/2012. 14 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2012-02-10
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 12 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Spectrum L.P. to 3/12/2012. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2012-02-08
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 11 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Mobility LLC to 3/26/2012; AT&T, Inc. to 3/26/2012. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2012-02-06
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 8 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. to 3/12/2012. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2012-02-06
Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint 9 is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T, Inc. to 3/12/2012. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( mll, )
- 2012-01-13
Judge Leonard Davis added. (mll, )
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.