Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC v. Add-On Computer Peripherals, LLC

Summary

Ring Technology sues 19 memory and computer makers for infringing its patent on data storage technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Swissbit NA, Inc. (defendant) Ramaxel Technology (Shenzhen) Limited (defendant) Ramaxel Technology Limited (defendant) Qimonda North America Corp. (defendant) Lenovo Group Limited d/b/a Legend (defendant) Legend Corporation Limited (defendant) Legend Corporate Services Pty Limited (defendant) Upgradedetect, Inc. d/b/a Goldenram (defendant) Edge Tech Corporation (defendant) Buffalo Inc. (defendant) Wintec Industries, Inc. (counter claimant) Unigen Corporation (counter claimant) Super Talent Technology, Corp. (counter claimant) Mitecs Inc. (cross claimant) Lenovo (United States) Inc. d/b/a Lenovo International (counter claimant) Legacy Electronics, Inc. (counter claimant) Hynix Semiconductor America Inc. (counter claimant) Hynix Semiconductor Inc. (counter claimant) Dataram Corporation (counter claimant) Corsair Memory, Inc. (counter claimant)

Docket entries

1. #3342012-01-11

   ORDER granting 333 Motion to Dismiss. All parties have been dismissed, this case is hereby closed. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/11/2012. (ch, ) (Entered: 01/11/2012)

2. #3332012-01-10

   MOTION to Dismiss Case by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Giza, Alexander) (Entered: 01/10/2012)

3. #3322012-01-09

   ORDER granting 331 Motion to Dismiss. All claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit between plaintiff, Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, and defendant, Unigen Corporation, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of that certain agreement entitled PATENTS IN SUIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them.. Signed by Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 1/6/12. (ehs, ) (Entered: 01/09/2012)

4. #3312011-12-21

   MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice (Stipulated) by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 12/21/2011)

5. #3302011-12-19

   ORDER granting 329 Motion to Stay. All pending deadlines between Unigen Corporation and Ring Technology Enterprise of Texas, LLC in this matter are stayed thirty (30) days from the date of this order.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 12/19/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 12/19/2011)

6. #3292011-12-15

   Agreed MOTION to Stay by Unigen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 12/15/2011)

7. #3282011-11-01

   DOCKET CONTROL ORDER, ( Amended Pleadings due by 1/6/2012., Discovery due by 1/21/2013., Joinder of Parties due by 1/6/2012., Markman Hearing set for 9/11/2012 09:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before Judge David Folsom., Motions due by 3/26/2013., Jury Selection set for 4/1/2012 09:00 AM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before Judge David Folsom., Pretrial Conference set for 4/1/2013 09:30 AM in Mag Ctrm (Marshall) before Judge David Folsom.), Motions terminated: 325 Joint MOTION to Enter Docket Control Order filed by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, Unigen Corporation.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/1/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 11/01/2011)

8. #3272011-11-01

   DISCOVERY ORDER. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 11/1/2011. (ch, ) (Entered: 11/01/2011)

9. #3262011-10-31

   Joint MOTION to Enter Discovery Order by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, Unigen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ni, Hao) (Entered: 10/31/2011)

10. #3252011-10-31

    Joint MOTION to Enter Docket Control Order by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, Unigen Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ni, Hao) (Entered: 10/31/2011)

11. #3242011-10-20

    ORDER granting 323 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Deadline to hold a conference of the Parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) is extended from the current deadline until and including October 31, 2011.. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/19/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 10/20/2011)

12. #3232011-10-17

    Agreed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Discovery Order and Docket Control Order by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Ni, Hao) (Entered: 10/17/2011)

13. #3222011-10-04

    MISC. ORDER 11-1 REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge David Folsom for all further proceedings. Judge T. John Ward no longer assigned to case. Signed by Judge David Folsom on 10/3/2011. (ch, ) (Entered: 10/04/2011)

14. #3212011-09-15

    ORDER - This case is now set for jury selection on April 1, 2013 and for a claim construction on September 11, 2012. The parties shall submit their proposed docket control and discovery orders to the court on October 14, 2011. For purposes of computing the time deadlines under the local patent rules the court deems October 31, 2011 to be the date of the initial case management conference. As a result, the Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions is due on October 21, 2011.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 9/15/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 09/15/2011)

15. #3202011-08-01

    ORDER granting 319 Motion to Dismiss. All claims and counter claims asserted in this suit between plaintiff, Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, and defendant, Wintec Industries, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of that certain agreement entitled PATENTS IN SUIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and dated July 22, 2011. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 8/1/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

16. #3192011-07-28

    MOTION to Dismiss (Stipulated Motion to Dismissal with Prejudice) by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 07/28/2011)

17. #3182011-07-26

    ORDER granting 317 Motion to Dismiss. All claims and counterclaims asserted in this suit between plaintiff, Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC, and defendant, Mitecs, Inc., are hereby dismissed with prejudice, subject to the terms of that certain agreement entitled PATENTS IN SUIT SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT and dated July 18, 2011. It is further ORDERED that all attorneys fees and costs are to be borne by the party that incurred them.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/26/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 07/26/2011)

18. #3172011-07-25

    MOTION to Dismiss (Stipulated Motion to Dismissal with Prejudice) by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 07/25/2011)

19. #3162011-07-22

    ORDER granting 315 Motion to Dismiss. All claims in this action against Apacer Memory America, Inc. and Apacer Technology, Inc. WITHOUT PREJUDICE, with each party to bear their own costs, expenses, and attorneys fees.. Signed by Judge T. John Ward on 7/22/11. (ehs, ) (Entered: 07/22/2011)

20. #3152011-07-21

    Unopposed MOTION to Dismiss without Prejudice by Ring Technology Enterprises of Texas, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Spangler, Andrew) (Entered: 07/21/2011)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.