CopyrightS.D.N.Y.1:26-cv-00959

Goldman v. Rogers Communications Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Justin Goldman sues Rogers Communications and Sportsnet for copyright infringement.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Docket no.
1:26-cv-00959
Nature of suit
Copyright
Filed
2026-02-03
Last filing
2026-04-28

Cause

17:101 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Justin Goldman (plaintiff) Rogers Media Inc. d/b/a Sportsnet (defendant) Rogers Communications Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #52026-04-28

    CIVIL JUDGMENT that for the reasons stated in the April 14, 2026, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Court's judgment would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/28/2026) (Attachments: # 1 Appeal Package) (tp)

  2. 2026-04-27

    Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk

  3. 2026-04-16

    Mail Order by USPS

  4. #42026-04-14

    ORDER OF DISMISSAL : Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and theref ore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). Plaintiff has not included his address on his pleadings, as he is required to do. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). This order will be viewable on the public docket, and the Court directs the Clerk of Court to mail the order to an address used in a recent action, which is 15 West 55th Street, A pt. 5B, New York, NY 10019, and to email the order to the email address from which Plaintiff transmitted his complaint, which is justin@pr1mesound.com. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 4/14/2026) (sgz) Transmission to Pro Se Assistants for processing.

  5. #32026-03-02

    ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Within thirty days of the date of this order, Plaintiff must either pay the $405.00 in fees or, if Plaintiff is unable to pay such fees, Plaintiff should complete, sign, and submit the attached IFP application. Payment of the fees should be mailed to the following address: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Cashiers-Room 260, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007. Payment of the fees by postal mail must (1) be made by money order or certified check; (2) be made payable to: Clerk, USDC, SDNY; and (3) include the docket number listed above. Personal checks are not accepted. Payment of the fees also can be made in person at the courthouse by credit card, m oney order, certified check, or cash.No further action will be taken in this case, and no summons shall issue, until the fees are paid or a completed and signed IFP application is received. If Plaintiff complies with this order, the case shall be pro cessed in accordance with the procedures of the Clerk's Office. If the Court grants the IFP application, Plaintiff will be permitted to proceed without prepayment of fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). If Plaintiff submitted proper payment fo r this action before receiving this order, the case will proceed once that payment is processed. If Plaintiff fails to comply with this order within the time allowed, or fails to seek an extension of time to comply, the action will be dismissed with out prejudice to refiling. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Plaintiff has not included his address on his pleadings, as he is required to do. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). This order will be viewable on the public docket, and the Court di rects the Clerk of Court to mail the order to an address used in a recent action, which is 15 West 55th Street, Apt. 5B, New York, NY 10019, and to email the order to the email address from which Plaintiff transmitted his complaint, which is justin@pr1mesound.com. SO ORDERED. Filing Fee due by 4/1/2026. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 4/1/2026. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/2/2026) (sgz) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.

  6. 2026-02-19

    NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case..(kgo)

  7. 2026-02-19

    Notice of Case Assignment/Reassignment - Sua Sponte

  8. #22026-02-05

    STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (jca) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

  9. 2026-02-05

    CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(jca)

  10. 2026-02-05

    Note Regarding Service on Self-Represented Party

  11. #12026-02-03

    COMPLAINT against Rogers Communications Inc., Rogers Media Inc. d/b/a Sportsnet. Document filed by Justin Goldman.(jca) (Entered: 02/05/2026)

  12. 2026-02-03

    Case Designated ECF. (jca)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-08