10Tales, Inc. v. TikTok, Inc.
Summary
10Tales sues TikTok for patent infringement over technology used in the video platform.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Cozen O'ConnorBarry Paul Golob, Samuel A. Lewis, Samuel Abraham Lewis +1 more
- Davis Firm, P.C.Rudolph Fink , IV
- Davis Firm, PCWilliam E. Davis , III
- Loeb & Loeb LLPAndrew M Hutchison
- Independent counselNathan Dooley
- Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLPEric K. Gill, James Young Hurt, Martin R. Bader +3 more
- Sheppard Mullin Richter and Hampton LLPKrysti Papadopoulos
- Sheppard Mullin Richter HamptonZachary Alper
- Sheppard Mullin Richter Hampton LLPMichael James Hopkins
- Sheppard, Mullin, Richter, & Hampton LLPEricka J Schulz
- Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLPJason Erik Mueller
- Fish & Richardson P.C.David M. Hoffman
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Docket no.
- 5:21-cv-03868
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Disposition
- dismissed
- Filed
- 2021-05-21
- Last filing
- 2026-05-07
- Terminated
- 2024-04-02
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
10TALES, INC. (plaintiff) ByteDance Inc. (defendant) Bytedance Ltd (defendant) TikTok Pte. Ltd. (defendant) Tiktok Inc. (defendant)
Docket entries
- 2023-09-19
1 - Terminate Hearings AND Case Management Conference - Further
- 2023-09-14
Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings
- 2023-09-05
Set/Reset Hearings
- 2022-07-29
Claims Construction / Markman Hearing AND 1 - Terminate Hearings
- 2022-07-29
1 - Terminate Hearings AND Claims Construction / Markman Hearing
- 2022-07-28
1 - Terminate Hearings AND Tutorial Hearing
- 2022-07-19
Clerk's Notice
- 2022-07-08
Order
- 2022-04-28
Case Assigned/Reassigned
- 2022-02-14
~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings AND Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing
- 2021-11-25
Clerk's Notice Setting Zoom Hearing
- 2021-11-23
Clerk's Notice
- 2021-11-15
ADR Clerks Notice re: Non-Compliance after 5/1/2018
- 2021-09-03
Clerk's Notice
- 2021-06-09
Clerk's Notice of Impending Reassignment - Text Only
- 2020-12-04
Text Order GRANTING 26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply entered by Judge Alan D Albright. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion toDismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(6), having been presented to me, and the Court taking note that the Motion is Unopposed by Defendant, therefore,Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants Motion to Dismiss Under Federal Rule 12(b)(6) is GRANTED and Plaintiffs Response will be due on or before December 18, 2020.(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
- 2020-11-20
Text Order GRANTING 23 Motion for Leave to File Sealed Document entered by Judge Alan D Albright. The Court has considered Defendants motion for leave to file under seal its Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, Transfer under 28 U.S.C. ยง1404, and supporting Exhibit A (the Motion to Seal), and is of the opinion that theMotion to Seal should be GRANTED. Within seven (7) days of filing the original sealed documents, Defendant must file a redacted version of the sealed documents. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Motion to Seal is GRANTED in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss under Federal Rules 12(b)(3) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, Transfer and supporting Exhibit A shall be kept filed under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a redacted version of the sealed documents shall be filed electronically within seven (7) days after the filing of the original sealed document. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
- 2020-09-28
Text Order GRANTING 11 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Before the Court is the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice. The Court, having reviewed the Motion, finds it should be GRANTED and therefore orders as follows: IT IS ORDERED the Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall immediately tender the amount of $100.00, made payable to: Clerk, U.S. District Court, in compliance with Local Rule AT-I (f)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant, if he/she has not already done so, shall apply for admission to the bar of this court in compliance with Local Rule AT-1(f)(1).(This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (ep4)
- 2020-09-17
Reset Answer Deadlines: TIKTOK, INC. answer due 11/9/2020. (bw)
- 2020-09-02
Case assigned to Judge Alan D Albright. CM WILL NOW REFLECT THE JUDGE INITIALS AS PART OF THE CASE NUMBER. PLEASE APPEND THESE JUDGE INITIALS TO THE CASE NUMBER ON EACH DOCUMENT THAT YOU FILE IN THIS CASE. (lad)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.