PatentFed. Cir.13-1184Closed

Microsoft Corporation v. Datatern, Inc.

Get an email if this closed case reopens or anything new is filed.

Summary

SAP America, SAP AG, and Microsoft sued Datatern for patent infringement in the Federal Circuit. The case involves allegations that Datatern's technology infringes one or more patents held by the plaintiffs, though the specific patent numbers and technology at issue are not identified in the available case information.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Latest ruling: defendant (2014-07-25)

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Docket no.
13-1184
Nature of suit
Patent
Disposition
judgment
Filed
2013-01-29
Last filing
2014-08-01
Terminated
2014-05-05

Entities in this case

Microsoft41Datatern

Parties

SAP AMERICA, INC. (plaintiff) SAP AG (plaintiff) MICROSOFT CORPORATION (plaintiff) DATATERN, INC. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #682014-08-01

    Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. Service as of this date by Clerk of Court [172094] [JXB] [Entered: 08/01/2014 08:19 AM]

  2. #672014-07-25

    ORDER filed denying [60] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Microsoft Corporation. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by Clerk of Court. [170436] [JXB] [Entered: 07/25/2014 11:55 AM]

  3. #662014-07-25

    ORDER filed denying [58] petition for panel rehearing filed by DataTern, Inc.; denying [58] petition for en banc rehearing filed by DataTern, Inc. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by Clerk of Court. [170430] [JXB] [Entered: 07/25/2014 11:52 AM]

  4. #652014-06-24

    16 paper copies of the response [64] received from Appellee Microsoft Corporation. [163264] [JXB] [Entered: 06/24/2014 02:31 PM]

  5. #642014-06-20

    RESPONSE of Appellee Microsoft Corporation to the petition for en banc rehearing [58] filed by Appellant DataTern, Inc. in 13-1184, petition for panel rehearing [58] filed by Appellant DataTern, Inc. in 13-1184. Service: 06/20/2014 by email. [162926] [Edward Reines] [Entered: 06/20/2014 06:04 PM]

  6. #632014-06-06

    16 paper copies of the petition for en banc rehearing [60] received from Appellee Microsoft Corporation. [159905] [JXB] [Entered: 06/09/2014 09:35 AM]

  7. #622014-06-06

    The court invites a response from Appellee Microsoft Corporation to the petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in 13-1184 [159577] [AT] [Entered: 06/06/2014 10:56 AM]

  8. #612014-06-05

    16 paper copies of the confidential document [59] received from Appellant DataTern, Inc.. [159451] [JXB] [Entered: 06/05/2014 05:59 PM]

  9. #602014-06-04

    Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellee Microsoft Corporation. Service: 06/04/2014 by email. [159140] [Edward Reines] [Entered: 06/04/2014 07:27 PM]

  10. #592014-06-04

    Sealed or confidential document received [Petition for Rehearing En Banc and for Rehearing New PAnel ] (corresponding to Doc No. [58]),(corresponding to Doc No. [58]) for Appellant DataTern, Inc.. Service: 06/04/2014 by email. [159130] [Lee Bromberg] [Entered: 06/04/2014 06:02 PM]

  11. #582014-06-04

    Petition for en banc rehearing, for panel rehearing filed by Appellant DataTern, Inc.. Service: 06/04/2014 by email. [159129] [Lee Bromberg] [Entered: 06/04/2014 05:59 PM]

  12. #572014-05-21

    CORRECTED certificate of service for Appellant DataTern, Inc. for attorney entry of appearance, Doc No. [56]. Service: 05/21/2014 by email. [156216] [William Zucker] [Entered: 05/21/2014 05:06 PM]

  13. #562014-05-21

    Entry of appearance for William A. Zucker as of counsel for Appellant DataTern, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2014 by email. [156197] [William Zucker] [Entered: 05/21/2014 04:13 PM]

  14. #552014-05-21

    Letter from Appellant DataTern, Inc. Request for reason for recusal. Service: 05/21/2014 by email. [156173] [William Zucker] [Entered: 05/21/2014 03:23 PM]

  15. #542014-05-05

    3 paper copies of the confidential document (petition for panel rehearing) [51] received from Appellant DataTern, Inc. [152591] [SJ] [Entered: 05/06/2014 09:34 AM]

  16. #532014-05-05

    OPINION and JUDGMENT filed. The judgment or decision is: Affirmed-in-Part, Reversed-in-Part, Remanded. (Precedential Opinion). (For the Court: Prost,Circuit Judge and Moore,Circuit Judge). [152464] [SJ] [Entered: 05/05/2014 03:56 PM]

  17. #522014-05-05

    ORDER filed vacating the April 4, 2014 panel opinion. A new decision is forthcoming and the time for rehearing petitions will begin anew. No additional briefing or argument is necessary at this time. By: Panel. Service: 05/05/2014 by clerk. [152447] [13-1184, 13-1185] [SJ] [Entered: 05/05/2014 03:37 PM]

  18. #512014-05-02

    Sealed or confidential document received [Confidential Peititon for Panel Rehearing ] (corresponding to Doc No. [50]) for Appellant DataTern, Inc.. Service: 05/02/2014 by email. [152191] [Lee Bromberg] [Entered: 05/02/2014 05:13 PM]

  19. #502014-05-02

    Petition for panel rehearing filed by Appellant DataTern, Inc.. Service: 05/02/2014 by email. [152189] [Lee Bromberg] [Entered: 05/02/2014 05:11 PM]

  20. #492014-04-04

    OPINION and JUDGMENT filed. The judgment or decision is: Affirmed-in-Part, Reversed-in-Part, and Remanded. (Precedential Opinion). (For the Court: Rader,Chief Judge; Prost,Circuit Judge and Moore,Circuit Judge). Opinion dissenting-in-part filed by Chief Judge Rader. [145982] [13-1184, 13-1185] Pursuant to 5/5/14 order, this opinion is vacated. [JXB] [Entered: 04/04/2014 12:02 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-13