TrademarkN.D. Cal.3:26-cv-01174

Autodesk, Inc. v. Google LLC

Summary

Autodesk sues Google for trademark infringement over use of Autodesk's marks.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff

Coverage events: 1P · 0D · 2N (24 articles)

Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

1 plaintiff-favorable · 0 defendant-favorable · 23 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 0 defendant · 2 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable
Defendant-favorable

None classified yet.

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2026-02-09 · coverage 1P / 0D / 19N2026-02-16 · coverage 0P / 0D / 4NDocketFiled 2026-02-062026-04-17 · filing · favors defendant MOTION to Dismiss in Part Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Google LLC. Motion to Dismiss H…2026-04-17 · filing · favors defendant Request for Judicial Notice and Consideration of Documents Incorporated by Reference in …Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
Docket no.
3:26-cv-01174
Nature of suit
Trademark
Judge
Richard Seeborg
Filed
2026-02-06
Last filing
2026-07-16

Cause

15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Entities in this case

Google125Autodesk

Parties

Google LLC Autodesk, Inc.

Docket entries

  1. #442026-07-09

    No description on file

  2. #432026-06-17

    No description on file

  3. #422026-06-05

    No description on file

  4. #412026-05-27

    No description on file

  5. #402026-05-15

    No description on file

  6. #392026-04-17

    Request for Judicial Notice and Consideration of Documents Incorporated by Reference in Support of Google's Motion to Dismiss in Part Plaintiff's Complaint filed byGoogle LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Angela L. Dunning in Support, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Proposed Order)(Dunning, Angela) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  7. #382026-04-17

    Order. Signed, as modified, on 4/17/2026 by Chief Judge Richard Seeborg granting 34 Stipulation Regarding Briefing Schedule on Google's Motion to Dismiss and Postponement of Initial Case Management Conference.(klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  8. #372026-04-17

    MOTION to Dismiss in Part Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Google LLC. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 6/11/2026 01:30 PM in San Francisco, Courtroom 12, 19th Floor. Responses due by 5/15/2026. Replies due by 5/29/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Dunning, Angela) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  9. #362026-04-17

    ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Dunning, Angela) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  10. #352026-04-17

    ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options (Puzella, Mark) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  11. #342026-04-17

    STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Briefing Schedule on Google LLC's Motion to Dismiss and Postponement of Initial Case Management Conference filed by Google LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Angela L. Dunning in Support)(Dunning, Angela) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  12. #332026-04-17

    ADR Clerk's Notice re: Non-Compliance with Court Order. The parties have failed to file an ADR Certification as required by the Initial Case Management Scheduling Order. Counsel shall comply promptly with the requirements of ADR L.R. 3-5(b) and shall file the ADR Certification. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)(cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2026) (Entered: 04/17/2026)

  13. 2026-04-17

    No description on file

  14. 2026-04-17

    No description on file

  15. 2026-04-17

    Set Deadlines/Hearings: per Order 38 Case Management Statement due by 7/9/2026. Initial Case Management Conference set for 5/7/2026 is continued to 7/16/2026 10:00 AM in San Francisco, - Videoconference Only. This proceeding will be held via a Zoom webinar.Webinar Access: All counsel, members of the public, and media may access the webinar information at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/rs Court Appearances: Advanced notice is required of counsel or parties who wish to be identified by the court as making an appearance or will be participating in the argument at the hearing. A list of names and emails must be sent to the CRD at rscrd@cand.uscourts.gov no later than 7/14/2026 by 2:00 PM.Civ LR 77-3(d). Persons granted access to court proceedings held by telephone or videoconference are reminded that photographing, recording, and rebroadcasting of court proceedings, including screenshots or other visual copying of a hearing, is absolutely prohibited.Zoom Guidance and Setup: https://cand.uscourts.gov/judges/remote-access-court-proceedings/participating-court-proceedings-zoo. (klh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2026)

  16. 2026-02-24

    No description on file

  17. 2026-02-23

    No description on file

  18. 2026-02-20

    No description on file

  19. 2026-02-20

    No description on file

  20. 2026-02-09

    No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-07-17