Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. v. Time Warner Cable Inc.

Summary

Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing sued Time Warner Cable, Charter Communications, Cablevision, and other telecom and internet service providers for patent infringement. The case involves a patent under 35 U.S.C. § 271, though the specific patent number and technology aren't detailed in the available records. The defendants include major cable and wireless carriers.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Charter Communications Inc. (plaintiff) Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (plaintiff) Time Warner Cable Inc. (plaintiff) Netscape Communications Corporation (plaintiff) United States Cellular Corporation (plaintiff) Qwest Interprise America Inc. (defendant) Qwest Broadband Services Inc. (defendant) Qwest LD Corp. (defendant) Cablevision of New Jersey Inc. (defendant) Cablevision of Monmouth Inc. (defendant) Cablevision of Litchfield Inc. (defendant) Cablevision of Hudson County Inc. (defendant) Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc. (defendant) CSC Holdings Inc. (defendant) Compuserve Interactive Services Inc. (defendant) Qwest Communications International Inc. (defendant) Qwest Wireless LLC (defendant) TDS Metrocom LLC (defendant) TDS Telecommunications Corporation (defendant) Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #942007-11-06

   NOTICE of Withdrawal of Appearance by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. (Heaney, Julia) (Entered: 11/06/2007)

2. #932007-04-23

   ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT from the United States District Court for the Central District of CA, Western Division. (mmm) (Entered: 04/24/2007)

3. #922007-04-11

   Letter from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware to Clerk of Court, United States District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, regarding transfer of Katz Interactive Call Processing Patent Litigation, MDL 1816. (mmm) (Entered: 04/11/2007)

4. #912007-04-09

   Certified TRANSFER ORDER from the MDL Panel. (mmm) (Entered: 04/11/2007)

5. #902007-04-09

   Letter from Clerk of Court, U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Western Division, regarding Transfer Order from the MDL Panel. (mmm) (Entered: 04/11/2007)

6. #892007-02-09

   Letter to The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet from Kelly E. Farnan regarding Your Honor's consideration of a recent decision of the Patent Office granting a request for ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 5,128,984 - re 87 Reply Brief,,,,,,,. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 02/09/2007)

7. #882007-02-07

   Letter to The Honorable Gregory M. Sleet from Mary B. Graham regarding request for oral argument - re 80 MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents]. (Graham, Mary) (Entered: 02/07/2007)

8. #872007-02-02

   REPLY BRIEF re 80 MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] DEFENDANTS' REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STAY ACTION PENDING THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE'S REEXAMINATION OF THE KATZ PATENTS filed by United States Cellular Corporation, TDS Telecommunications Corporation, TDS Metrocom LLC, Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC, Charter Communications Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company LLC, Charter Communications Operating LLC, Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC, Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Wireless LLC, Qwest Communications Corporation, Qwest LD Corp., Qwest Broadband Services Inc., Qwest Interprise America Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company L P, AOL LLC, Compuserve Interactive Services Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit Exhibit D)(Moyer, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/02/2007)

9. #862007-01-17

   ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 80 MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] filed by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 1/29/2007. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-E)(Graham, Mary) (Entered: 01/17/2007)

10. #852007-01-04

    MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sarah E. Piepmeier - filed by Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC. (Cottrell, Frederick) (Entered: 01/04/2007)

11. #842006-12-22

    STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Plaintiff may have an additional two weeks to file its Ans. Brf. in Opposition to January 17, 2007 - filed by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.. (Heaney, Julia) (Entered: 12/22/2006)

12. #832006-12-19

    NOTICE of filing reply brief re 68 Notice (Other). Reply brief filed by Global Crossing Telecommunications in support of its Motion to Transfer and Consolidation before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. (Motion filed in paper format and maintained in the Clerk's Office in 06-546). (mmm) (Entered: 12/19/2006)

13. #822006-12-18

    DECLARATION re 81 Opening Brief in Support,,,,,,, [Declaration of Kelly E. Farnan in Support of Defendants' Opening Brief in Support of Their Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of the Katz Patents] by United States Cellular Corporation, TDS Telecommunications Corporation, TDS Metrocom LLC, Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC, Charter Communications Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company LLC, Charter Communications Operating LLC, Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC, Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Wireless LLC, Qwest Communications Corporation, Qwest LD Corp., Qwest Broadband Services Inc., Qwest Interprise America Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company L P, AOL LLC, Compuserve Interactive Services Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2 - 7)(Moyer, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/18/2006)

14. #812006-12-18

    OPENING BRIEF in Support re 80 MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] filed by United States Cellular Corporation, TDS Telecommunications Corporation, TDS Metrocom LLC, Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC, Charter Communications Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company LLC, Charter Communications Operating LLC, Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC, Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Wireless LLC, Qwest Communications Corporation, Qwest LD Corp., Qwest Broadband Services Inc., Qwest Interprise America Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company L P, AOL LLC, Compuserve Interactive Services Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 1/8/2007. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Moyer, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/18/2006)

15. #802006-12-18

    MOTION to Stay [Defendants' Motion to Stay Action Pending the Patent and Trademark Office's Reexamination of Katz Patents] - filed by United States Cellular Corporation, TDS Telecommunications Corporation, TDS Metrocom LLC, Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC, Charter Communications Inc., Charter Communications Holding Company LLC, Charter Communications Operating LLC, Charter Communications Entertainment I LLC, Qwest Communications International Inc., Qwest Wireless LLC, Qwest Communications Corporation, Qwest LD Corp., Qwest Broadband Services Inc., Qwest Interprise America Inc., Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC, Time Warner Entertainment Company L P, AOL LLC, Compuserve Interactive Services Inc., Netscape Communications Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Moyer, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/18/2006)

16. #792006-11-21

    MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney David A. Segal - filed by Cablevision Systems Corporation, CSC Holdings Inc., Cablevision Systems New York City Corporation, Cablevision of Brookhaven Inc., Cablevision of Connecticut Corporation, Cablevision of Hudson County Inc., Cablevision of Litchfield Inc., Cablevision of Monmouth Inc., Cablevision of New Jersey Inc., Cablevision of Oakland LLC, Cablevision of Rockland/Ramapo LLC. (Farnan, Kelly) (Entered: 11/21/2006)

17. #782006-11-21

    REPLY BRIEF in Support of Motion for Transfer and Consolidation of Katz Technology Licesning Patent Litigation filed before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on behalf of Target Corporation, Target Bank, and Target National Bank. The Declaration and Exhibits 1-58 are filed in paper format and will be maintained in the Clerk's Office under Civil Action No. 06-543. (Attachments: # 1)(mmm) (Entered: 11/21/2006)

18. #772006-11-20

    ANSWER to Counterclaim of Charter Communications, Inc.; Charter Communications Holding Company LLC; Charter Communications Operating, LLC; and Charter Communications Entertainment I, LLC by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P..(Heaney, Julia) (Entered: 11/20/2006)

19. #762006-11-20

    ANSWER to Counterclaim of United States Cellular Corporation, TDS Telecommunications Corporation and TDS Metrocom LLC by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P..(Heaney, Julia) (Entered: 11/20/2006)

20. #752006-11-20

    ANSWER to Counterclaim of Time Warner Cable Inc., Time Warner NY Cable LLC and Time Warner Cable Entertainment Company L.P. by Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P..(Heaney, Julia) (Entered: 11/20/2006)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.