Pointwise Ventures LLC v. Nike, Inc.

Summary

Pointwise Ventures is suing Nike for patent infringement in federal court in New York. The case involves a patent-eligible invention (specific patent details not publicly disclosed in available filings). The dispute centers on whether Nike's products or processes infringe Pointwise Ventures' patented technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Docket entries

1. #212026-06-05

   ORDER: The Court having been advised that all claims asserted herein have been settled, it is ORDERED, that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within sixty (60) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty (60) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised t hat if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next sixty (60) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/5/2026) (jca)

2. #202026-06-04

   Extension of Time to File Answer

3. #172026-05-01

   Appear Pro Hac Vice

4. 2026-05-01

   Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion

5. 2026-05-01

   Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

6. #162026-04-30

   Appear Pro Hac Vice

7. #152026-04-28

   Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

8. #142026-04-28

   Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement

9. #132026-04-28

   Extension of Time to File Answer

10. #122026-04-27

    Notice of Appearance

11. #112026-04-27

    Appear Pro Hac Vice

12. #102026-04-27

    Appear Pro Hac Vice

13. 2026-04-27

    Notice Regarding Deficient Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

14. 2026-03-25

    Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice

15. 2026-03-05

    Case Designated ECF. (sj)

16. 2026-03-05

    Case Opening Initial Assignment Notice

17. 2026-03-05

    Magistrate Judge Ona T. Wang is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj)

18. 2026-03-05

    CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Edgardo Ramos. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj)

19. 2026-03-04

    Notice Regarding Pro Hac Vice Motion

20. 2026-03-04

    >>>NOTICE REGARDING PRO HAC VICE MOTION. Regarding Document No. 6 MOTION for Isaac P. Rabicoff to Appear Pro Hac Vice . Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number ANYSDC-32493377. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The document has been reviewed and there are no deficiencies. (rju)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.