The Valley Breeze Consulting, LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc

Summary

Valley Breeze Consulting is suing Cisco Systems for patent infringement in federal court. The lawsuit centers on allegations that Cisco's products or services infringe one or more of Valley Breeze's patents. The case was filed in the Northern District of California.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

15:1126 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

The Valley Breeze Consulting, LLC (plaintiff) Cisco Systems Inc (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #92026-08-21

   Reply to Opposition/Response; Declaration of David A Makman in Support of Reply/Opposition; Exhibit 1 to Makman Declaration

2. #82026-08-14

   Administrative Motion to File Under Seal

3. #72026-08-12

   CLERK'S NOTICE RE-SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH 1 .Motion Hearing is RESET from 10/15/2026 TO 10/23/2026 AT 2:00pm in-person in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/12/2026) (Entered: 08/12/2026)

4. 2026-08-12

   Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

5. #62026-08-07

   OPPOSITION/RESPONSE (re 1 MOTION ) filed byCisco Systems Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Ryan Thorne in Support of Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Opposition to the Valley Breeze Consulting LLC's Motion to Quash and Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Cross Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Proposed Order, # 11 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Magic, Peter) (Filed on 8/7/2026) (Entered: 08/07/2026)

6. #52026-08-07

   Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Another Party's Material Should Be Sealed filed by Cisco Systems Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit - Opposition to the Valley Breeze Consulting LLC's Motion to Quash Subpoena and Cross Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum, # 3 Exhibit - Declaration of Ryan Thorne in Support of Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Opposition to the Valley Breeze Consulting LLC's Motion to Quash and Cisco Systems, Inc.'s Cross Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5)(Magic, Peter) (Filed on 8/7/2026) (Entered: 08/07/2026)

7. #42026-08-05

   CLERK'S NOTICE SETTING HEARING ON MOTION TO QUASH 1 . Motion Hearing set for 10/15/2026 01:00 PM in-person in San Francisco, Courtroom F, 15th Floor before Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (jaf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2026) (Entered: 08/05/2026)

8. 2026-08-05

   Clerk's Notice AND ~Util - Set Motion and Deadlines/Hearings

9. #32026-07-27

   NOTICE by The Valley Breeze Consulting, LLC re 1 Motion to Quash Subpoena, Hearing on Sept. 3, 2026 (Makman, David) (Filed on 7/27/2026) (Entered: 07/27/2026)

10. #22026-07-27

    Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Peter H Kang. (amf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2026) (Entered: 07/27/2026)

11. 2026-07-27

    ~Util - Miscellaneous Case Assigned by Intake

12. #12026-07-24

    MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA against Cisco Systems Inc ( Filing fee $ 52, receipt number ACANDC-22256155.). Filed by The Valley Breeze Consulting, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David Makman in Support of Motion to Quash)(Makman, David) (Filed on 7/24/2026) Modified on 7/31/2026 (bjw, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 07/24/2026)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.