Phenix Longhorn, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd
Summary
Phenix Longhorn is suing Samsung Electronics and its subsidiaries for patent infringement in federal court in Texas. The lawsuit targets Samsung's allegedly infringing technology or products, though the specific patented invention is not detailed in the case information. The case seeks damages for Samsung's unauthorized use of Phenix Longhorn's patented technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Cherry Johnson Siegmund James, PLLCCraig David Cherry, Mark Douglas Siegmund
- Cherry Johnson Siegmund James PLLCWilliam David Ellerman
- Hudnell Law Group P.C.Lewis E Hudnell , III
- The Gikkas Law Firm, P.C.Nicolas S Gikkas
- Thompson Technology LawStanley H Thompson , Jr
- Goodwin Procter LLPDarryl M Woo, David A Serati, Kathleen Treaster +4 more
- O'Melveny & Myers LLP - LANicholas J Whilt, Ryan K Yagura
- Goodwin Procter, LLP - Washington DCPatrick J McCarthy
- Goodwin Proctor, LLP- BostonDouglas J Kline
- O'Melveny & Myers LLPMarc J Pensabene
- Gillam & Smith LLPAndrew Thompson (Tom) Gorham
- Gillam & Smith, LLPMelissa Richards Smith
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 2:24-cv-01077
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Robert W. Schroeder III
- Filed
- 2024-12-30
- Last filing
- 2026-09-23
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Phenix Longhorn, LLC (plaintiff) Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (defendant) Samsung Mexicana S.A. De C.V. (defendant) Samsung Display Co. Ltd. (defendant) Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd (defendant)
Docket entries
- #962026-08-21
Certificate of Service
- #952026-08-20
Status Report
- #942026-08-11
Notice of Attorney Appearance
- #932026-07-07
Notice (Other)
- #922026-04-30
Order
- #912026-02-18
Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief
- #902026-02-09
Miscellaneous Relief
- #892025-10-28
Order AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys AND ~Util - Terminate Motions
- #882025-10-28
Notice of Attorney Appearance - Pro Hac Vice
- 2025-10-28
Notice of Docket Correction
- #872025-10-22
Withdraw as Attorney
- #862025-08-14
Order AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys
- #852025-08-13
Withdraw as Attorney
- #842025-08-05
Order on Motion to Amend/Correct
- 2025-05-23
Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference
- 2025-05-21
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 5/21/2025. The parties were given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Court's proposed docket control order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within fourteen days. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Mark Siegmund; Defense - Tom Gorham. No exhibits. (Court Reporter - Not Recorded) (wea)
- 2025-01-02
Case Assigned/Reassigned
- 2025-01-02
Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability
- 2025-01-02
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
- 2025-01-02
Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.