CopyrightILND1:26-cv-10803

LULU TO PRO LLC v. Aurex Ventures LLC

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

LULU TO PRO LLC is suing Aurex Ventures LLC for copyright infringement in federal court in Illinois. The lawsuit also names Rhythovent Studios LLC and Voguevibe LLC as parties. The specific work or creative content at the center of the dispute is not identified in the available case information.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
  • Independent counselQin Zhuang
Court
ILND
Docket no.
1:26-cv-10803
Nature of suit
Copyright
Judge
Manish S. Shah
Filed
2026-09-08
Last filing
2026-09-09

Cause

17:501 Copyright Infringement

Entities in this case

Aurex VenturesLULU TO PRO

Parties

LULU TO PRO LLC (plaintiff) Rhythovent Studios LLC (defendant) Voguevibe LLC (defendant) Aurex Ventures LLC (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #52026-09-09

    SUMMONS Issued (Court Participant) as to Defendants Aurex Ventures LLC, Rhythovent Studios LLC, Voguevibe LLC (ee, ) (Entered: 09/09/2026)

  2. #32026-09-08

    CIVIL Cover Sheet (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 09/08/2026)

  3. #22026-09-08

    ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiff LULU TO PRO LLC by Qin Zhuang (Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 09/08/2026)

  4. #12026-09-08

    COMPLAINT filed by LULU TO PRO LLC; Filing fee $ 405, receipt number AILNDC-25629231. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Zhuang, Qin) (Entered: 09/08/2026)

  5. 2026-09-08

    CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Manish S. Shah. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Heather K. McShain. Case assignment: Random assignment. (Civil Category 3). (kc, )

  6. 2026-09-08

    CLERK'S NOTICE: Pursuant to Local Rule 73.1(b), a United States Magistrate Judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action. If all parties consent to have the currently assigned United States Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, the entry of final judgment, and all post-trial proceedings, all parties must sign their names on the attached Consent To form. This consent form is eligible for filing only if executed by all parties. The parties can also express their consent to jurisdiction by a magistrate judge in any joint filing, including the Joint Initial Status Report or proposed Case Management Order. (kc, )

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-09