PatentTXED2:25-cv-00753

Touchstream Technologies, Inc. v. Hisense Co. Ltd.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Touchstream Technologies is suing Hisense and its various subsidiaries for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on Touchstream's patented technology, likely related to streaming or interactive TV features used in Hisense's smart televisions and media platforms. The case, filed in federal court in Texas, seeks damages for alleged unauthorized use of the patented innovation.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Latest ruling: neutral (2026-07-29)

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorableDocketFiled 2025-08-012026-07-10 · filing · favors plaintiff RESPONSE in Opposition re 40 SEALED MOTION to Compel filed by Touchstream Technologies, …2026-07-13 · ruling · favors neutral ORDER reT 39 Motion to Compel. The Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is G…2026-07-14 · filing · favors defendant UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File to File Response in Support of Its Motion to Compel b…2026-07-17 · filing · favors plaintiff RESPONSE in Opposition re 46 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File to File Response in Supp…2026-07-21 · filing · favors plaintiff SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re 40 SEALED MOTION to Compel filed by Touchstream Techno…2026-07-29 · ruling · favors neutral ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Sealed Motion to Compel. Signed by Distric…Aug 25Jan 26Jul 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
TXED
Docket no.
2:25-cv-00753
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap
Filed
2025-08-01
Last filing
2026-09-29

Cause

15:1126 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Touchstream Technologies, Inc. (plaintiff) Vidaa International Holdings B.V. (defendant) Hisense Electronica Mexico S.A. de C.V. (defendant) Qingdao Hisense Media Networks Ltd. (defendant) Hisense International (HK) Co. Ltd. (defendant) HISENSE IMPORT & EXPORT CO. LTD (defendant) Hisense International Co. Ltd. (defendant) HISENSE INTERNATIONAL (HONG KONG) AMERICA INVESTMENT CO., LTD (defendant) Hisense Visual Technology Co. Ltd. (defendant) Hisense Co. Ltd. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #492026-07-29

    ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Sealed Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 07/29/2026. (mdj) (Entered: 07/29/2026)

  2. #482026-07-21

    SUR-REPLY to Reply to Response re 40 SEALED MOTION to Compel filed by Touchstream Technologies, Inc.. (Dykal, Ryan) (Entered: 07/21/2026)

  3. #472026-07-17

    RESPONSE in Opposition re 46 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File to File Response in Support of Its Motion to Compel filed by Touchstream Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Dykal, Ryan) (Entered: 07/17/2026)

  4. #462026-07-14

    UNOPPOSED MOTION for Leave to File to File Response in Support of Its Motion to Compel by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Reply in Support of Motion to Compel, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Esterhay, John) (Entered: 07/14/2026)

  5. #452026-07-13

    ORDER reT 39 Motion to Compel. The Court finds that the Motion should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART with respect to Interrogatory Nos. 9, 10, and 15 as described herein and DENIED in all other respects. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/13/2026. (slo) (Entered: 07/13/2026)

  6. #442026-07-10

    RESPONSE in Opposition re 40 SEALED MOTION to Compel filed by Touchstream Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Touchstream's First Supplemental Responses to Hisense First Request for Admission, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Touchstream's First Supplemental Responses to Hisense's First Interrogatories)(Dykal, Ryan) (Entered: 07/10/2026)

  7. 2026-06-26

    Sealed Motion

  8. 2026-02-05

    Notice of Deficiency

  9. 2026-02-05

    Clerk's LR CV-10(d) Notice of Deficiency as to - LR CV-7(i) or LR CR-47(a)(3) requires this document to include a certificate of conference that complies with the rule. Recommended cure: Within one day, Filer must refile with the word Corrected in the title of the document. The filer should use the same ECF event and when offered the docket text enhancement dropdown, select CORRECTED so it will also appear in the docket text. (mdj)

  10. 2026-01-23

    Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference

  11. 2026-01-20

    Notice of Hearing

  12. 2026-01-20

    NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 1/22/2026 at 12:00 PM in Ctrm 106 (Marshall) before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. **NOTE: ONLY THE TIME HAS CHANGED. (aeb)

  13. 2025-11-26

    Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability

  14. 2025-11-26

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (Copy of the notice to be sent by US Mail to parties not electronically noticed.) (NKL)

  15. 2025-09-23

    Answer Due Deadline Updated for Hisense Co. Ltd. to 11/25/2025. (KLC)

  16. 2025-09-23

    Update Answer Deadline

  17. 2025-08-01

    Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability

  18. 2025-08-01

    District Judge Rodney Gilstrap added. (mdj)

  19. 2025-08-01

    Add and Terminate Judges

  20. 2025-08-01

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (mdj)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-30