Nazomi Communications Inc v. Nokia Corporation
Summary
Multiple tech companies including Garmin, Western Digital, Nokia, Vizio, Amazon, and Microsoft sued ARM over patent infringement in the Central District of California. The case involves a patent dispute (35 U.S.C. § 145) but the specific patent at issue is not identified in the case record. The lawsuit centers on allegations that ARM's technology infringes one or more of the plaintiffs' patents.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Independent counselErica C Tierney, Iain R Cunningham, Kevin G McBride +2 more
- Greenberg Traurig LLPDonald Patrick Bunnin, Paul Jonathan Brown
- Munger Tolles & OlsonPeter A Detre
- Munger Tolles & Olson LLPGregory P Stone
- One LLPPeter R Afrasiabi
- Morrison and Foerster LLPCharles S Barquist, Scott C Moore
- Brown White and Newhouse LLPGeorge B Newhouse , Jr
- Hanson Bridgett LLPRussell C Petersen
- Morrison & FoersterMartin Murray Noonen
- Morrison and FoersterRachel Krevans
- Townsend Townsend & CrewRoger L Cook
- Townsend Townsend & Crew LLPIris Sockel Mitrakos
- Wiley Rein LLPKevin P Anderson
- Brown White & Newhouse LLPSydney M Mehringer
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Central District of California
- Docket no.
- 8:10-cv-00151
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- David O. Carter
- Disposition
- transferred
- Filed
- 2010-02-08
- Last filing
- 2010-10-21
- Terminated
- 2012-03-27
Cause
35:145 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Garmin Corporation (plaintiff) Western Digital Technologies Inc (plaintiff) Nokia Corporation (plaintiff) Nazomi Communications Inc (plaintiff) Vizio Inc (plaintiff) Amazon.com Inc (plaintiff) Microsoft Corporation (plaintiff) ARM Inc (defendant) ARM LTD. (defendant) Iomega Corporation (defendant) Sling Media Inc (defendant) Garmin USA Inc (defendant) Garmin International Inc (defendant) Garmin Ltd. (defendant) Western Digital Corporation (defendant) Nokia Inc (defendant)
Docket entries
- #2082010-10-21
Cooley LLP's Request for Termination of Electronic Notices (Friel, Thomas) (Entered: 10/21/2010)
- #2072010-10-19
RECEIVED Notice of Receipt of Electronic Case Transferred from California Centralhas been opened in California Northern District as case 3:10-cv-04686 filed 10/18/2010. (yl) (Entered: 10/20/2010)
- #2052010-10-14
NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) 199 . The following error(s) was found: Civil Case Initiating Documents. Complaints (such as third-party complaints, amended complaints, complaints in intervention, counterclaims and cross-claims) and other civil case initiating documents shall be filed in the traditional manner rather than electronically pursuant to General Order 10-07. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (rrp) (Entered: 10/14/2010)
- #2062010-10-12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting 134 Motion to Transfer Case, Striking Motion to Dismiss 155 . Case transferred to the Northern District of California. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (ade) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/14/2010: # 1 ltr) (ade). (Entered: 10/14/2010)
- #2042010-10-08
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting Stipulation Extending Time for defendants Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc to Respond to First Amended Complaint 196 . (mt) (Entered: 10/09/2010)
- #2032010-10-07
ANSWER to First Amended Complaint 184 and COUNTERCLAIM against Nazomi Communications Inc. filed by Defendant Vizio Inc.(nbo) (Entered: 10/08/2010)
- #2022010-10-07
ANSWER to First Amended Complaint 184, COUNTERCLAIM against Nazomi Communications Inc. filed by Amazon.com Inc.(nbo) (Entered: 10/08/2010)
- #2012010-10-07
CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendants/Intervenors ARM Inc, ARM LTD., identifying ARM Holdings plc. (Newhouse, George) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #2002010-10-07
ANSWER to Amended Complaint, 184 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendants Garmin Corporation, Garmin International Inc, Garmin USA Inc.(Cook, Roger) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1992010-10-07
ANSWER to Amended Complaint, 184 Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims filed by Defendants/Intervenors ARM Inc, ARM LTD..(Newhouse, George) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1982010-10-07
ANSWER to Amended Complaint, 184 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Western Digital Technologies Inc.(Newhouse, George) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1972010-10-07
ANSWER to Amended Complaint, 184 and Affirmative Defenses filed by Defendant Western Digital Corporation.(Newhouse, George) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1962010-10-07
STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to October 14, 2010 re Amended Complaint, 184 filed by defendants Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Afrasiabi, Peter) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1952010-10-07
ANSWER to Amended Complaint, 184 filed by defendant Vizio Inc.(Simon, Evan) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1942010-10-07
NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Defendant Vizio Inc of Vizio Inc.'s Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. (Simon, Evan) (Entered: 10/07/2010)
- #1922010-10-06
ORDER granting request for additional time to respond to first amended complaint by Judge David O. Carter; re Stipulation for Extension of Time to File 188 . The deadline for Sling Media Inc to answer or respond to plaintiff's complaint is 10/28/10. (twdb) (Entered: 10/06/2010)
- #1932010-10-05
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge David O. Carter. (nbo) (Entered: 10/06/2010)
- #1912010-10-04
SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: 1. SETTING DISCOVERY CUT-OFF DATE: September 16, 2011; 2. MOTION CUT-OFF DATE: October 3, 2011; 3. SETTING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: November 7, 2011 (at 8:30 a.m.); 4. SETTING JURY TRIAL DATE: December 6, 2011 (at 8:30 a.m.). This Pretrial Scheduling Order governs the course of all pretrial proceedings in this case. For further guidance, consult the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules. (See document for further details.) IT IS SO ORDERED. (rla) (Entered: 10/05/2010)
- #1902010-10-04
MINUTES OF Scheduling Conference held before Judge David O. Carter: The Court sets the following case management dates:*Discovery Cut Off - 09-16-2011 *Discovery to be handled by Judge Carter; Markman and Motion Cut Off - 10-03-2011 at 8:30 a.m.; Final Pre Trial Conference - 11-07-2011 at 8:30 a.m.; Jury Trial - 12-06-2011 at 8:30 a.m. (4 days). Pretrial Scheduling Order signed and filed this date. Any unserved Does/Roes are dismissed at this time. The parties shall select an expert located within Southern California and inform the Court of their selection within two weeks. (rla) (Entered: 10/05/2010)
- #1892010-10-01
NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Martin Murray Noonen counsel for Defendant Sling Media Inc. Filed by defendant Sling Media, Inc. (Noonen, Martin) (Entered: 10/01/2010)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.