PatentTXED2:23-cv-00539

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. v. Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

SK nexilis sued Solus Advanced Materials and its Volta Energy Solutions subsidiaries for patent infringement in Texas federal court. The lawsuit concerns a patent-protected technology or process, though the specific patent number and technical details are not identified in the case record. The dispute involves multiple Volta entities across Canada, Hungary, and Europe.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
TXED
Docket no.
2:23-cv-00539
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap
Filed
2023-11-21
Last filing
2026-10-09

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

SK nexilis Co., Ltd. (plaintiff) Volta Energy Solutions Canada Inc. (defendant) Volta Energy Solutions Hungary KFT (defendant) Volta Energy Solutions Europe KFT (defendant) Volta Energy Solutions S.A.R.L. (defendant) Solus Advanced Materials Co., Ltd. (defendant) David Folsom (mediator) David Keyzer (technical advisor)

Docket entries

  1. 2026-05-21

    In Chambers Conference

  2. 2026-04-10

    Set/Reset Hearings

  3. 2026-03-23

    Notice of Hearing on Motion

  4. 2026-03-17

    Notice of Hearing on Motion

  5. 2026-01-29

    Set/Reset Hearings

  6. 2026-01-07

    Set/Reset Hearings

  7. 2025-10-06

    Notice of Hearing

  8. 2025-08-22

    Notice of Hearing

  9. 2025-08-18

    Notice of Docket Correction

  10. 2025-08-11

    Notice of Deficiency

  11. 2025-08-04

    Notice of Hearing on Motion

  12. 2025-02-25

    Notice of Hearing

  13. 2024-06-12

    Notice of Docket Correction

  14. 2024-06-12

    Notice of Magistrate Judge Availability

  15. 2024-06-07

    Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference

  16. 2024-05-29

    Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap: Scheduling Conference/Case Management Conference held on 5/29/2024. Counsel for the parties appeared. Court asked whether the parties consented to trial before the U.S. Magistrate Judge. Court proceeded to provide counsel Claim Construction and Jury Selection/Trial dates. (Court Reporter Shelly Holmes) (aeb)

  17. 2023-11-22

    Case Assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, )

  18. 2023-11-22

    Notice of Magistrate Availability

  19. 2023-11-22

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

  20. 2023-11-22

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, )

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-10-09