PatentS.D. Cal.3:04-cv-00613Closed

Hewlett-Packard v. Gateway Inc

Get an email if this closed case reopens or anything new is filed.

Summary

Hewlett-Packard and Intel sued Gateway and EMachines for patent infringement. The lawsuit centers on computer technology patents, though the specific patents aren't identified in the case record. The dispute involves allegations that the defendants' computer products violated the plaintiffs' patent rights.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Latest ruling: neutral (2006-06-05)

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorableDocketFiled 2004-03-242006-06-02 · ruling · favors neutral Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas; Settlement Disposition Conf 4:00 6/6/06 is off c…2006-06-05 · ruling · favors neutral Joint Stipulation and Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: All asserted claims and countercl…Mar 04Apr 05Jun 06filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
Court
U.S. District Court, Southern District of California
Docket no.
3:04-cv-00613
Nature of suit
Patent
Judge
Rudi M. Brewster
Disposition
dismissed
Filed
2004-03-24
Last filing
2006-06-05
Terminated
2006-06-05

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

- Hewlett-Packard Company (plaintiff) Gateway, Inc. (plaintiff) Hewlett-Packard Company (plaintiff) Intel Corporation (plaintiff) EMachines Inc. (movant) Compaq Information Technologies Group, L.P. (counter defendant) Hewlett-Packard Develpment Company, L.P. (counter defendant)

Docket entries

  1. #2332006-06-05

    Joint Stipulation and Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: All asserted claims and counterclaims in lead case 04cv613-B(LSP) and consolidated case 04cv1676-B)LSP) are dismissed w/o prejudice; Each party to bear its own attys fees, costs and expenses incurred in the action to date terminating case (jah) (Entered: 06/06/2006)

  2. #2322006-06-02

    Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas; Settlement Disposition Conf 4:00 6/6/06 is off calendar ; Dismissal received (jah) (Entered: 06/06/2006)

  3. #2312006-05-12

    Joint Stipulation and Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: Hearing on Gateway's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [216-1] is continued to 10:30 on 6/19/06 before Judge Rudi Brewster (jah) (Entered: 05/15/2006)

  4. #2302006-05-01

    Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas; Settlement Disposition Conf on 5/4/06 is vacated and reset for 4:00 on 6/6/06 before Magistrate Judge Leo Papas (jah) (Entered: 05/02/2006)

  5. #2292006-04-28

    Joint Stipulation and Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: All proceedings are stayed until 5/31/06; Case stayed (jah) (Entered: 04/28/2006)

  6. #2282006-04-13

    Joint Stipulation and order cont certain dates and Order by Judge Rudi M. Brewster : re motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [216-1] motion hearing reset for 5/15/06 at 10:30 am before Judge Rudi Brewster (axr) Modified on 05/09/2006 (Entered: 04/13/2006)

  7. #2272006-04-03

    Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas; Settlement Dispo Conf vacated and reset for 4:00 5/4/06 before Mag Judge Leo Papas (cag) (Entered: 04/04/2006)

  8. #2262006-03-15

    Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing Certain Dates by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: The last day to complete written discovery related to the patents in Groups 1 and 2 is continued to 4/14/06. The last day to declare intention to assert an advice of cnsl defense and produce related documents for the patents in Groups 3 and 4 is continued until 4/14/06. The hrg on Gateway's motion for leave to amend is continued to 10:30 5/1/06 before Judge Rudi Brewster [26-1]. (dkt clerk) Modified on 03/16/2006 (Entered: 03/16/2006)

  9. #2252006-03-03

    Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas: Settlement Disposition Conf set for 4:00 4/4/06 before Mag Judge Leo Papas; Settlement Conf set for 3/22/06 at 11:00 a.m. and 3/23/06 at 2:00 p.m. are vacated (dkt clerk) (Entered: 03/06/2006)

  10. #2242006-02-28

    Joint Stipulation and Order Continuing Certain Dates by Judge Rudi M. Brewster: The hrg on Gateway's motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [216-1] continued to 10:30 4/10/06 before Judge Rudi Brewster (dkt clerk) (Entered: 03/01/2006)

  11. #2232006-02-21

    Proof of service by defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 of: document no. 222 (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/24/2006)

  12. #2222006-02-21

    Answer by defendant/counterclaimant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 to Hewlett-Packard Development Company L.P.'s counterclaims to Gateway, Inc.'s 1st amd complaint in case no. 04cv01676-B(LSP) (ok per ct) (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/24/2006)

  13. #2212006-02-17

    Answer to 2nd amd complaint; jury demand and third amd counterclaims by defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/21/2006)

  14. #2192006-02-16

    Order by Magistrate Judge Leo S. Papas: Settlement Conf set for 11:00 3/22/06 before Mag Judge Leo Papas Settlement Conf set for 2:00 3/23/06 before Mag Judge Leo Papas (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/16/2006)

  15. #2202006-02-15

    Notice of Appearance for Gateway Inc by attys Bryan Farney and Jonathan D. Baker (atty maint) (cag) (Entered: 02/17/2006)

  16. #2182006-02-15

    Declaration of Jonathan D. Baker by defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613, counter-claimant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 in support of motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [216-1] (nunc pro tunc to 2/13/06) (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/16/2006)

  17. #2172006-02-15

    Brief by defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613, counter-claimant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 in support of its motion for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [216-1] (nunc pro tunc to 2/13/06) (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/16/2006)

  18. #2162006-02-15

    Notice of Motion and Motion by defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613, counter-claimant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613 for leave to amend its answer and counterclaims to plead inequitable conduct with respect to U.S. Patent No. 6,609,211 [motion(s) referred to Judge Rudi M. Brewster] motion hrg set for 3/13/06 at 10:30 a.m. (nunc pro tunc to 2/13/06) (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/16/2006)

  19. #2152006-02-15

    DISCREPANCY ORDER by Judge Rudi M. Brewster accepting document: brief in support of motion from defendant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613, counter-claimant Gateway Inc in 3:04-cv-00613, non-compliance with local rule 7.1 or 47.1, the document is to be filed nunc pro tunc to the date received (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/15/2006)

  20. #2142006-02-13

    Claims Construction Order For United States Patent Number 5,802,318 by Judge Rudi M. Brewster (dkt clerk) (Entered: 02/13/2006)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-09-27