Solid 21, Inc. v. Breitling USA, Inc
Summary
Solid 21 sues Breitling USA for trademark infringement over luxury watch brand rights.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Direct: 212-851-6821David Hecht, Esq., -, Yi Wen Wu, Esq., -
- Direct: 202-434-5050Lisa S. Blatt, Attorney
- Direct: 202-434-5847Amy Mason Saharia, Esq., Partner
- Direct: 213-270-7856Craig Joel Mariam, Esq., -
- Direct: 619-696-6700Hazel Mae B. Pangan, Esq., -
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
- Docket no.
- 22-366
- Nature of suit
- 3840 PROPERTY RIGHTS-Trademark
- Filed
- 2022-02-23
- Last filing
- 2024-05-01
Entities in this case
Parties
Solid 21, Inc. (plaintiff) CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A. (defendant) Breitling AG (defendant) Breitling SA (defendant) Breitling USA, Inc (defendant)
Docket entries
- #2522024-05-01
CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 04/26/2024, to CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN) receipt, RETURNED.[3621898] [22-366] [Entered: 05/01/2024 02:51 PM]
- #2512024-04-26
CERTIFIED ORDER, dated 04/26/2024, to CONNECTICUT (NEW HAVEN), ISSUED.[3621413] [22-366] [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:46 PM]
- #2502024-04-26
STATEMENT OF COSTS, on behalf of Appellees Breitling AG, Breitling SA and Breitling USA, Inc, FILED.[3621410] [22-366]--[Edited 04/26/2024 by RO] [Entered: 04/26/2024 03:41 PM]
- #2472024-04-22
JUDGMENT MANDATE, ISSUED.[3620627] [22-366] [Entered: 04/22/2024 08:43 AM]
- #2462024-04-12
ORDER, petition for rehearing denied, by RCW, RJS, MHP, FILED.[3619593] [22-366] [Entered: 04/12/2024 11:15 AM]
- #2442024-04-02
MOTION ORDER, denying as moot motion to extend time [236] filed by Appellant Solid 21, Inc., the petition for rehearing was timely filed on 03/28/2024, FILED. [3617985][244] [22-366] [Entered: 04/02/2024 11:05 AM]
- #2412024-03-28
ITEMIZED BILL OF COSTS, on behalf of Appellee Breitling AG, Breitling SA and Breitling USA, Inc, FILED. Service date 03/28/2024 by CM/ECF.[3617558] [22-366] [Entered: 03/28/2024 06:15 PM]
- #2382024-03-28
PETITION FOR REHEARING, on behalf of Appellant Solid 21, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/28/2024 by CM/ECF.[3617513] [22-366] [Entered: 03/28/2024 01:59 PM]
- #2362024-03-22
MOTION, to extend time, on behalf of Appellant Solid 21, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/22/2024 by CM/ECF. [3616476] [22-366] [Entered: 03/22/2024 12:25 PM]
- #2352024-03-14
JUDGMENT, FILED.[3615103] [22-366] [Entered: 03/14/2024 01:29 PM]
- #2322024-03-14
CAPTION, in light of opinion filed 03/14/2024, AMENDED.[3614993] [22-366] [Entered: 03/14/2024 09:51 AM]
- #2282024-03-14
OPINION, Dissenting, by MHP, FILED.[3614983] [22-366] [Entered: 03/14/2024 09:44 AM]
- #2272024-03-14
OPINION, the judgment of the district court is affirmed, by RCW, RJS, MHP, FILED.[3614978] [22-366] [Entered: 03/14/2024 09:41 AM]
- #2262024-03-14
NEW CASE MANAGER, Margaret Lain, ASSIGNED.[3614973] [22-366] [Entered: 03/14/2024 09:31 AM]
- #2232023-05-23
CASE, before RSP, RCW, MHP, HEARD.[3519858] [22-366] [Entered: 05/23/2023 10:10 AM]
- #2222023-05-15
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ARGUMENT NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[3515724] [22-366] [Entered: 05/15/2023 03:20 PM]
- #2212023-04-24
NOTICE OF HEARING DATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT, on behalf of Appellee Breitling AG, Breitling SA and Breitling USA, Inc, FILED. Service date 04/24/2023 by CM/ECF. [3504209] [22-366] [Entered: 04/24/2023 04:10 PM]
- #2202023-03-29
NOTICE OF HEARING DATE ACKNOWLEDGMENT, on behalf of Appellant Solid 21, Inc., FILED. Service date 03/29/2023 by CM/ECF. [3491499] [22-366] [Entered: 03/29/2023 04:04 PM]
- #2192023-03-29
ARGUMENT NOTICE, to attorneys/parties, TRANSMITTED.[3491395] [22-366] [Entered: 03/29/2023 02:59 PM]
- #2182023-03-27
CASE CALENDARING, for argument on 05/23/2023, SET.[3489860] [22-366] [Entered: 03/27/2023 01:28 PM]
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.