Blix Inc. v. Apple Inc.

Summary

Blix Inc. sues Apple for patent infringement in federal court.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Parties

BLIX INC. (plaintiff) APPLE INC. (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #682023-01-12

   Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [896633] [MVH] [Entered: 01/12/2023 02:29 PM]

2. #672022-12-06

   REMINDER: All counsel of record are reminded of their responsibility per F Fed. Cir. R. 47.3 to promptly submit an amended Entry of Appearance (EOA) as information changes during the pendency of the appeal. Note: Please review the EOA and contact information for Sarah Elizabeth Benowich. Failure to comply with these Rules may delay the timely processing of your case or result in adverse action. [888512] [MVH] [Entered: 12/06/2022 09:57 AM]

3. #662022-12-06

   JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Issued pursuant to Federal Circuit Rule 36. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [888493] [MVH] [Entered: 12/06/2022 09:20 AM]

4. #652022-12-05

   Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Moore, Chief Judge; Chen, Circuit Judge and Cunningham, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Thomas Burt for Blix Inc., David A. Loewenstein for Blix Inc. and Mark Andrew Perry for Apple Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [888369] [MJL] [Entered: 12/05/2022 04:05 PM]

5. #642022-11-29

   Citation of Supplemental Authority pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) for Appellee Apple Inc.. Service: 11/29/2022 by email. [886887] [21-2203] [Mark Perry] [Entered: 11/29/2022 10:27 AM]

6. #632022-11-29

   MODIFIED ENTRY: RESPONSE of Apple Inc. to Doc No. [62]. Service: 11/29/2022 by email. [886886]--[Edited 11/29/2022 by MJL to correct filing event] [Mark Perry] [Entered: 11/29/2022 10:24 AM]

7. #622022-11-18

   Citation of Supplemental Authority pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) for Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/18/2022 by email. [884912] [21-2203] [David Loewenstein] [Entered: 11/18/2022 10:43 AM]

8. #612022-11-09

   Amended Entry of Appearance for Thomas H. Burt; David Loewenstein; Guy Yonay; Lillian R. Grinnell; Mark C. Rifkin as counsel for Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/09/2022 by email. [883138] [21-2203] [David Loewenstein] [Entered: 11/09/2022 01:16 PM]

9. #602022-11-08

   ORDER filed granting motion leave to appear as counsel [59] filed by Appellant Blix Inc. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [882687] [MVH] [Entered: 11/08/2022 09:28 AM]

10. #592022-11-07

    MOTION of Appellant Blix Inc. for leave to file entry of appearance for Thomas H. Burt; David Loewenstein; Guy Yonay; Lillian R. Grinnell; Mark C. Rifkin. Service: 11/07/2022 by email. [882564] [21-2203] [Guy Yonay] [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:57 PM]

11. #582022-11-07

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. [55] for Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/07/2022 by email. [882546] [21-2203] [Guy Yonay] [Entered: 11/07/2022 01:14 PM]

12. #572022-11-04

    Corrected Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/04/2022 by email. [882425] [21-2203] [David Loewenstein] [Entered: 11/04/2022 06:02 PM]

13. #562022-11-04

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/04/2022 by email. [882384] [21-2203] [David Loewenstein] [Entered: 11/04/2022 04:09 PM]

14. #552022-11-04

    MOTION of Appellant Blix Inc. for leave to file entry of appearance for Thomas Burt; David Loewenstein; Guy Yonay; Lillian R. Grinnell; Mark C. Rifkin. Service: 11/04/2022 by email. [882377] [21-2203]. This document has been corrected. See Doc. Nos. [58], [59]. [Guy Yonay] [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:59 PM]

15. #542022-11-04

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Blix Inc.. Service: 11/04/2022 by email. [882373] [21-2203] [Thomas Burt] [Entered: 11/04/2022 03:58 PM]

16. #532022-10-28

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellee Apple Inc.. Service: 10/28/2022 by email. [880897] [21-2203] [Mark Perry] [Entered: 10/28/2022 02:28 PM]

17. #522022-10-25

    ORDER filed granting motion to permit multiple counsel to represent Blix Inc. at oral argument [43] . Please see order for full details. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [880116] [MVH] [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:35 AM]

18. #512022-10-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2212B. Case scheduled December 5, 2022. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 11/04/2022. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [879481] [MJL] [Entered: 10/21/2022 02:11 PM]

19. #502022-06-10

    The following conflict dates submitted by Mark Andrew Perry for Apple Inc. have been accepted by the court: 11/01/2022, 11/02/2022, 11/03/2022, 11/04/2022, 11/07/2022. [855003] [MJL] [Entered: 06/10/2022 03:23 PM]

20. #492022-06-10

    Notice from Appellee Apple Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/10/2022 by email. [854835] [21-2203] [Mark Perry] [Entered: 06/10/2022 09:23 AM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.