Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.
Summary
Columbia Sportswear sues Seirus for patent infringement over innovative accessories technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: defendant (2024-05-20)
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Direct: 312-775-8000Christopher V. Carani
- Direct: 503-796-2494Nicholas (Nika) Fremont Aldrich, Jr., Attorney
- Direct: 503-796-2928Scott D. Eads, Esq., -
- Direct: 503-796-3735Sara Kobak, Esq., Attorney
- Direct: 858-678-5070John Winston Thornburgh, Attorney, Seth McCarthy Sproul, Attorney
- Direct: 858-678-4314Christopher Marchese
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Docket no.
- 21-2299
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Disposition
- judgment
- Filed
- 2021-09-10
- Last filing
- 2024-05-20
- Terminated
- 2023-09-15
Entities in this case
Parties
COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR NORTH AMERICA, INC. (plaintiff) SEIRUS INNOVATIVE ACCESSORIES, INC. (defendant)
Docket entries
- #722024-05-20
The petition for writ of certiorari, No. 23-1052, filed on 03/21/2024, was Denied on 05/21/2024. [1005703] [21-2299, 21-2338] [MVH] [Entered: 05/21/2024 05:01 PM]
- #712024-03-25
Petition for writ of certiorari filed on 03/21/2024 in the U.S. Supreme Court. No.: 23-1052, Inc. Seirus Innovative Accessories v. Inc. Columbia Sportswear North America. [993180] [21-2299, 21-2338] [MVH] [Entered: 03/26/2024 05:16 PM]
- #702023-12-29
Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [973616] [21-2299, 21-2338] [MVH] [Entered: 12/29/2023 11:27 AM]
- #692023-12-22
ORDER filed denying [67] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [972354] [MVH] [Entered: 12/22/2023 10:21 AM]
- #682023-11-20
13 paper copies of Doc. No. [67] received from Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.. [964481] [VDW] [Entered: 11/20/2023 01:21 PM]
- #672023-11-17
Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.. Service: 11/17/2023 by email. [964194] [21-2299] [John Thornburgh] [Entered: 11/17/2023 03:19 PM]
- #662023-11-16
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Petition for Rehearing En Banc [65], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 11/27/2023. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [963772] [MVH] [Entered: 11/16/2023 09:36 AM]
- #652023-11-15
Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.. Service: 11/15/2023 by email. [963687] [21-2299]. This document is non-compliant. See Doc. No. [66] [John Thornburgh] [Entered: 11/15/2023 07:08 PM]
- #642023-09-29
ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing/en banc [63] filed by Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. Any Petition for Rehearing due on or before 11/15/2023. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [953430] [MVH] [Entered: 09/29/2023 03:07 PM]
- #632023-09-28
MOTION of Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. to extend the time to 11/15/2023 to petition for rehearing. Service: 09/28/2023 by email. [953204] [21-2299]--[Edited 09/29/2023 by MVH to correct relief] [John Thornburgh] [Entered: 09/28/2023 05:51 PM]
- #622023-09-15
JUDGMENT. VACATED AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Cross-appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [950154] [21-2299, 21-2338] [MJL] [Entered: 09/15/2023 08:56 AM]
- #612023-09-15
OPINION filed for the court by Prost, Circuit Judge; Reyna, Circuit Judge and Hughes, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [950153] [21-2299, 21-2338] [MJL] [Entered: 09/15/2023 08:55 AM]
- #602023-01-12
Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Prost, Circuit Judge; Reyna, Circuit Judge and Hughes, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Nicholas (Nika) Fremont Aldrich, Jr. for Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc., Christopher V. Carani for Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. and Seth McCarthy Sproul for Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [896700] [MJL] [Entered: 01/12/2023 04:37 PM]
- #592023-01-03
Amended Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.. Service: 01/03/2023 by email. [894323] [21-2299] [Nicholas (Nika) Aldrich] [Entered: 01/03/2023 07:45 PM]
- #582023-01-03
Amended Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.. Service: 01/03/2023 by email. [894318] [21-2299] [Christopher Carani] [Entered: 01/03/2023 07:39 PM]
- #572022-12-30
ORDER filed granting Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.'s motion [53] to permit two arguing counsel. Columbia shall file amended responses to the notice of oral argument within 5 days. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [893888] [MJL] [Entered: 12/30/2022 01:38 PM]
- #562022-12-29
Letter from Appellant Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Letter re Notice of Intent to Use Visual Aids at Oral Argument. Service: 12/29/2022 by email. [893719] [21-2299] [Nicholas (Nika) Aldrich] [Entered: 12/29/2022 06:07 PM]
- #552022-12-29
Letter from Cross-Appellant Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. Letter of Intent to Display Visual Aids. Service: 12/29/2022 by email. [893617] [21-2299] [Seth Sproul] [Entered: 12/29/2022 01:42 PM]
- #542022-12-06
REPLY of Appellant Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. to response [51]. Service: 12/06/2022 by email. [888645] [21-2299] [Nicholas (Nika) Aldrich] [Entered: 12/06/2022 12:45 PM]
- #532022-12-05
MOTION of Appellant Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Unopposed Motion to Divide Oral Argument Between Two Attorneys. Service: 12/05/2022 by email. [888425] [21-2299] [Nicholas (Nika) Aldrich] [Entered: 12/05/2022 05:13 PM]
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.