Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC

Summary

Joe Salazar sues AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and HTC for patent infringement over mobile technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Parties

JOE A. SALAZAR (plaintiff) HTC AMERICA, INC. (defendant) HTC CORPORATION (defendant) CELLCO PARTNERSHIP INC., dba Verizon Wireless, Inc. (defendant) T-MOBILE USA, INC. (defendant) SPRINT UNITED MANAGEMENT COMPANY (defendant) AT&T MOBILITY LLC (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #552023-11-20

   The petition for writ of certiorari, No. 23-241, filed on 09/06/2023, was Denied on 11/20/2023. [964740] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 11/21/2023 09:10 AM]

2. #542023-09-14

   Petition for writ of certiorari filed on 09/06/2023 in the U.S. Supreme Court. No.: 23-241, Joe A. Salazar v. AT&T Mobility LLC. [950108]--[Edited 09/14/2023 by MJL to correct filed date] [MJL] [Entered: 09/14/2023 04:03 PM]

3. #532023-06-15

   Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [930305] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 06/15/2023 11:36 AM]

4. #522023-06-08

   ORDER filed denying [50] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Joe A. Salazar. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [928708] [MVH] [Entered: 06/08/2023 01:52 PM]

5. #512023-05-08

   13 paper copies of Doc. No. [50] received from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. [924313] [VDW] [Entered: 05/18/2023 10:41 AM]

6. #502023-05-05

   Petition for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 05/05/2023 by email. [921594] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 05/05/2023 04:28 PM]

7. #492023-04-05

   JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: No Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [914570] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:25 AM]

8. #482023-04-05

   OPINION filed for the court by Stoll, Circuit Judge; Schall, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [914569] [21-2320, 21-2376] [MVH] [Entered: 04/05/2023 10:24 AM]

9. #472022-11-07

   Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Stoll, Circuit Judge; Schall, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Mr. Dariush Keyhani for Joe A. Salazar and Mr. Todd Eric Landis for AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., Cellco Partnership Inc. and Sprint United Management Company.Oral Argument Audio available here. [882571] [JCP] [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:12 PM]

10. #462022-10-26

    Clerk's Note to the File: The oral argument scheduled for 11/07/2022 will now take place in Courtroom 201. [880460] [MJL] [Entered: 10/26/2022 03:10 PM]

11. #452022-10-05

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. Service: 10/05/2022 by email. [876159] [21-2320] [Dariush Keyhani] [Entered: 10/05/2022 03:10 PM]

12. #442022-10-05

    Response to notice of oral argument from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. Service: 10/05/2022 by email. [876140] [21-2320] [Todd Landis] [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:33 PM]

13. #432022-09-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2211L. Case scheduled November 7, 2022. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 10/05/2022. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [873188] [MVH] [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:01 PM]

14. #422022-08-10

    The following conflict dates submitted by Todd Eric Landis for AT&T Mobility LLC, T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. have been accepted by the court: 10/03/2022, 10/04/2022, 10/05/2022, 10/06/2022, 10/07/2022, 11/01/2022, 11/02/2022, 11/03/2022, 11/04/2022. [865832] [MJL] [Entered: 08/10/2022 09:33 AM]

15. #412022-08-09

    Notice from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 08/09/2022 by email. [865709] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 08/09/2022 12:42 PM]

16. #392022-06-13

    Notice from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 06/13/2022 by email. [855229] [21-2320] [Fred Williams] [Entered: 06/13/2022 01:50 PM]

17. #402022-06-08

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [32], [19] received from Cross-Appellants AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership Inc., Sprint United Management Company and T-Mobile USA, Inc.. [855458] [VDW] [Entered: 06/14/2022 11:38 AM]

18. #382022-06-08

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [34], [25], [11] received from Appellant Joe A. Salazar. [854491] [VDW] [Entered: 06/08/2022 05:11 PM]

19. #372022-06-06

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [853611] [JCW] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:50 AM]

20. #362022-06-06

    Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [853610] [JCW] [Entered: 06/06/2022 08:49 AM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.