Trinity Info Media, LLC v. Covalent, Inc.

Summary

Trinity Info Media sues Covalent for patent infringement in federal court.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Docket entries

1. #302023-08-21

   Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [944483] [MVH] [Entered: 08/21/2023 11:15 AM]

2. #292023-07-25

   Bill of Costs for Appellee Covalent, Inc.. Service: 07/25/2023 by email. [938450] [22-1308] [Thomas Dietrich] [Entered: 07/25/2023 05:33 PM]

3. #282023-07-14

   JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellant(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [936304] [MVH] [Entered: 07/14/2023 10:18 AM]

4. #272023-07-14

   OPINION filed for the court by Stoll, Circuit Judge; Bryson, Circuit Judge and Cunningham, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [936303] [MVH] [Entered: 07/14/2023 10:17 AM]

5. #262022-11-02

   Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Stoll, Circuit Judge; Bryson, Circuit Judge and Cunningham, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Gregory Hillyer for Trinity Info Media, LLC and Thomas Dietrich for Covalent, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [881684] [JCP] [Entered: 11/02/2022 11:45 AM]

6. #252022-10-31

   Citation of Supplemental Authority pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) for Appellant Trinity Info Media, LLC. Service: 10/31/2022 by email. [881341] [22-1308] [Gregory Hillyer] [Entered: 10/31/2022 05:36 PM]

7. #242022-10-12

   Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant Trinity Info Media, LLC. Service: 10/12/2022 by email. [877255] [22-1308] [Gregory Hillyer] [Entered: 10/12/2022 01:24 PM]

8. #232022-10-12

   Notice to Trinity Info Media, LLC: The record of this case indicates that no Response to Notice of Oral Argument under FCR 34(e) has been filed. Failure to file required documents may result in dismissal or other action as deemed appropriate by the court. See FCR 25(h). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [877210] [MJL] [Entered: 10/12/2022 11:25 AM]

9. #222022-10-05

   Response to notice of oral argument from Appellee Covalent, Inc.. Service: 10/05/2022 by email. [876236] [22-1308] [Thomas Dietrich] [Entered: 10/05/2022 06:44 PM]

10. #212022-09-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2211H. Case scheduled November 2, 2022. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 10/05/2022. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [873215] [MJL] [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:21 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.