ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Incorporated

Summary

ParkerVision sues Qualcomm for infringing its patents on radio frequency signal processing technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Entities in this case

Docket entries

1. #662024-10-15

   Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1039555] [22-1755, 24-2221] [MVH] [Entered: 10/15/2024 12:45 PM]

2. #652024-09-20

   Bill of Costs for Appellant ParkerVision, Inc.. Service: 09/20/2024 by email. [1033950] [22-1755] [Joshua Budwin] [Entered: 09/20/2024 05:40 PM]

3. #642024-09-06

   JUDGMENT. VACATED-IN-PART, REVERSED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Costs taxed against Appellee(s). Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1030479] [22-1755, 24-2221] [MVH] [Entered: 09/06/2024 10:10 AM]

4. #632024-09-06

   OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Mayer, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1030476] [22-1755, 24-2221] [MVH] [Entered: 09/06/2024 10:07 AM]

5. #622024-08-15

   Note to File: The following cases are consolidated: 22-1755 (Lead) with 24-2221 (Member). The parties must file all documents in the lead appeal only. [1025224] [22-1755, 24-2221] [MJL] [Entered: 08/15/2024 10:43 AM]

6. #612024-08-15

   ORDER filed. The mandate in 22-1755 is recalled, and the appeal is reinstated. Appeals 22-1755 and 24-2221 are consolidated. The court will issue its decision in due course based on the briefs already filed and the oral argument heard on 11/06/2023. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1025221] [22-1755, 24-2221] [MJL] [Entered: 08/15/2024 10:39 AM]

7. #602024-07-16

   Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1018295]. Mandate recalled pursuant to Order No. [61]. [MVH] [Entered: 07/16/2024 04:35 PM]

8. #592024-07-16

   ORDER filed. Appeal No. 22-1755 is dismissed. Please see the order for full and complete details. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1018287] [MVH] [Entered: 07/16/2024 04:31 PM]

9. #582024-07-08

   MODIFIED ENTRY: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED by Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. and Appellees Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 07/08/2024 by email. [1016032] --[Edited 07/08/2024 by MVH - Reason: to correct filing event] [Joel Thollander] [Entered: 07/08/2024 02:29 PM]

10. #572024-06-27

    ORDER filed. The parties are directed to file supplemental briefs in accordance with the order. Supplemental briefs due: 07/08/24. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1014036] [MVH] [Entered: 06/27/2024 03:20 PM]

11. #562023-11-06

    Submitted after ORAL ARGUMENT to Panel: Lourie, Circuit Judge; Mayer, Circuit Judge and Stark, Circuit Judge.Arguing counsel: Joshua Wright Budwin for ParkerVision, Inc. and Eamonn Gardner for Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc.Oral Argument Audio available here. [961694] [MJL] [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:46 PM]

12. #552023-09-28

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellant ParkerVision, Inc.. Service: 09/28/2023 by email. [953183] [22-1755] [Joshua Budwin] [Entered: 09/28/2023 04:12 PM]

13. #542023-09-28

    Response to notice of oral argument from Appellees Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated. Service: 09/28/2023 by email. [953168] [22-1755] [Eamonn Gardner] [Entered: 09/28/2023 03:18 PM]

14. #532023-09-21

    NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT. Panel: 2311B. Case scheduled November 6, 2023. Response to Notice of Oral Argument due: 10/05/2023. Please review the attached Notice. The response to notice of oral argument form can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [951562] [JCP] [Entered: 09/21/2023 02:38 PM]

15. #522023-09-07

    This entry was made in error and has been removed from the docket. Clerk's Note to the File. [948317]--[Edited 09/07/2023 by MJL to partially delete entry] [MJL] [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:41 AM]

16. #512023-09-07

    Clerk's Note to the File: The conflict dates requested by Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated (see Doc. No. [50]) are not accepted at this time. [948316] [MJL] [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:40 AM]

17. #502023-08-29

    Notice from Appellees Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. and Qualcomm Incorporated regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 08/29/2023 by email. [946560] [22-1755] [Eamonn Gardner] [Entered: 08/29/2023 04:05 PM]

18. #492023-08-25

    Notice from Appellant ParkerVision, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 08/25/2023 by email. [946006] [22-1755] [Joshua Budwin] [Entered: 08/25/2023 03:04 PM]

19. #482023-08-23

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [945377] [KMH] [Entered: 08/23/2023 04:00 PM]

20. #472023-02-27

    The following conflict dates submitted by Eamonn Gardner for Qualcomm Incorporated and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. have been accepted by the court: 05/01/2023, 05/02/2023, 05/03/2023, 05/04/2023, 05/05/2023. [906375] [MVH] [Entered: 02/27/2023 10:11 AM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.