VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
Summary
VLSI Technology sues Intel for infringing its patents in semiconductor technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: defendant (2024-03-07)
Counsel of record
- Direct: 310-277-1010Alan J. Heinrich, Benjamin W. Hattenbach, Esq., Attorney, Charlotte J. Wen, - +1 more
- Independent counselRayiner Hashem
- Direct: (202) 556-2000Jeffrey A. Lamken, -
- Direct: 202-556-2012Michael Gregory Pattillo, Jr.
- Direct: 310-203-7000Morgan Chu, Esq.
- Direct: 310-203-7961Amy E. Proctor
- Direct: 949-760-0991Babak Redjaian, Attorney
- Direct: 617-526-6000Lauren B. Fletcher, Attorney, William F. Lee
- Direct: 202-663-6432Steven Jared Horn
- Direct: 617-526-6396Joseph J. Mueller, Attorney
- Direct: 617-526-6809Alison Burton, -
- Direct: 720-274-3164Mary Virginia Sooter, Attorney
- Direct: 202-663-6304Amanda L. Major, Esq.
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Docket no.
- 22-1906
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2022-06-15
- Last filing
- 2024-03-14
- Terminated
- 2023-12-04
Entities in this case
Parties
VLSI TECHNOLOGY LLC (plaintiff) INTEL CORPORATION (defendant)
Docket entries
- #792024-03-14
Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [990606] [MVH] [Entered: 03/14/2024 12:08 PM]
- #782024-03-07
ORDER filed denying [76] petition for panel rehearing; rehearing en banc filed by Intel Corporation. By: Per Curiam. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [989035] [MVH] [Entered: 03/07/2024 11:08 AM]
- #772024-02-05
13 paper copies of Doc. No. [76] received from Appellant Intel Corporation. [981616] [VDW] [Entered: 02/05/2024 01:03 PM]
- #762024-02-02
Petition for panel rehearing, for en banc rehearing filed by Appellant Intel Corporation. Service: 02/02/2024 by email. [981379] [22-1906]--[Edited 02/05/2024 by MVH to remove comments from filing] [William Lee] [Entered: 02/02/2024 02:51 PM]
- #752023-12-18
ORDER filed granting motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing/en banc [74] filed by Appellant Intel Corporation. Petition for Rehearing due on or before 02/02/2024. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [971070] [MVH] [Entered: 12/18/2023 12:59 PM]
- #742023-12-15
MOTION of Appellant Intel Corporation to extend the time to file a Combined Petition for Panel Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc until 02/02/2024. Service: 12/15/2023 by email. [970553] [22-1906] [William Lee] [Entered: 12/15/2023 10:38 AM]
- #732023-12-04
JUDGMENT. AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED. Terminated on the merits after oral argument. COSTS: Each Side Bears Its Own Costs. Mandate to issue in due course. For information regarding costs, petitions for rehearing, and petitions for writs of certiorari click here. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [967198] [MVH] [Entered: 12/04/2023 08:54 AM]
- #722023-12-04
OPINION filed for the court by Lourie, Circuit Judge; Dyk, Circuit Judge and Taranto, Circuit Judge. Precedential Opinion. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [967197] [MVH] [Entered: 12/04/2023 08:53 AM]
- #712023-10-27
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [70] received from Appellee VLSI Technology LLC. [959718] [VDW] [Entered: 10/27/2023 02:19 PM]
- #702023-10-26
MODIFIED ENTRY: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED by Appellee VLSI Technology LLC. Service: 10/26/2023 by email. Paper copies of this brief must be provided within 5 business days. See FCR 25(c)(3). [959245] --[Edited 10/26/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 10/26/2023 01:07 PM]
- #692023-10-25
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [66] received from Appellant Intel Corporation. [958908] [VDW] [Entered: 10/25/2023 01:34 PM]
- #682023-10-24
NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The paper copies (Doc. No. [67]) provided by Intel Corporation are not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Corrected paper copies are due within 5 business days. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [958624] [VDW] [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:11 PM]
- #672023-10-24
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [66] received from Appellant Intel Corporation. [958623]. These paper copies are non-compliant. See Doc. No. [68] [VDW] [Entered: 10/24/2023 04:09 PM]
- #662023-10-23
MODIFIED ENTRY: SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED by Appellant Intel Corporation. Service: 10/23/2023 by email. [958227] --[Edited 10/23/2023 by MVH - Reason: compliance review complete] [William Lee] [Entered: 10/23/2023 01:12 PM]
- #652023-10-23
Notice of Related Case Information for Appellant Intel Corporation. Service: 10/23/2023 by email. [958225] [22-1906] [William Lee] [Entered: 10/23/2023 01:07 PM]
- #642023-10-16
6 paper copies of Doc. No. [63] received from Appellee VLSI Technology LLC. [957273] [VDW] [Entered: 10/18/2023 11:21 AM]
- #632023-10-16
SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FILED by VLSI Technology LLC. Service: 10/12/2023 by email. Paper copies of this brief must be provided within 5 business days. See FCR 25(c)(3). [956508] [MJL] [Entered: 10/16/2023 10:44 AM]
- #622023-10-16
ORDER filed granting VLSI Technology LLC's motion [60] to the extent that the supplemental brief is accepted, Intel shall file a responsive brief by 2:00 p.m. on 10/23/2023, and VLSI may file a reply brief by 2:00 p.m. on 10/26/2023. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [956506] [MJL] [Entered: 10/16/2023 10:42 AM]
- #612023-10-12
Notice of Related Case Information for Appellee VLSI Technology LLC. Service: 10/12/2023 by email. [956059] [22-1906] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 10/12/2023 07:50 PM]
- #602023-10-12
MOTION of Appellee VLSI Technology LLC leave to file a supplemental brief. Service: 10/12/2023 by email. [956058] [22-1906] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 10/12/2023 07:48 PM]
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.