VirnetX Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.
Summary
VirnetX, Leidos, and Science Applications International Corporation sued Apple and Cisco for patent infringement. The case involves patents in secure communication technology, heard by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Counsel of record
- Independent counselAllison Mileo Gorsuch, Attorney, Andy Tindel, Esq., Attorney, Donald Santos Urrabazo, Attorney +3 more
- Direct: 202-556-2024Rayiner Hashem, Attorney
- Direct: 214-888-4848Austin Curry
- Direct: 214-888-4850Jason Dodd Cassady, Attorney
- Direct: (214) 888-4848Bradley Wayne Caldwell
- Direct: 617-526-6000Lauren B. Fletcher, Attorney, William F. Lee
- Direct: 202-663-6022Brittany Blueitt Amadi
- Direct: 617-267-2300Rebecca A. Bact
- Direct: 650-858-6000Thomas Gregory Sprankling, Attorney
- Independent counselMark Christopher Fleming
- Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- Docket no.
- 18-1197
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2017-11-17
- Last filing
- 2020-02-24
- Terminated
- 2019-01-15
Entities in this case
Parties
LEIDOS, INC. (plaintiff) SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (plaintiff) VIRNETX INC. (plaintiff) APPLE INC. (defendant) CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. (defendant)
Docket entries
- #1092020-02-24
The petition for writ of certiorari, [19-832], filed on 12/27/2019, was Denied on 02/24/2020. [673710] [JAB] [Entered: 02/24/2020 03:08 PM]
- #1082020-01-02
Petition for writ of Certiorari filed on 12/27/2019, and placed on the docket 12/31/2019, in the Supreme Court of the United States. Supreme Court #: 19-832, Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc., et al. [660265] [JAB] [Entered: 01/02/2020 03:34 PM]
- #1072019-10-24
Notice from the Supreme Court of the United States: The application for an extension of time within which to file a petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-entitled case has been presented to The Chief Justice, who on October 18, 2019, extended the time to and including December 29, 2019. [645194] [JAB] [Entered: 10/28/2019 02:45 PM]
- #1062019-10-08
Mandate issued to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [640948] [JAB] [Entered: 10/08/2019 10:28 AM]
- #1052019-10-01
ORDER filed. Motions [98] and [99] filed by Apple Inc. are denied. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [639448] [MJL] [Entered: 10/01/2019 04:02 PM]
- #1042019-08-21
REPLY of Appellant Apple Inc. to response [103]. Service: 08/21/2019 by email. [629888] [18-1197] [William Lee] [Entered: 08/21/2019 01:31 PM]
- #1032019-08-19
RESPONSE of Appellees VirnetX Inc. and Leidos, Inc. to the motion to stay mandate [98] filed by Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 08/19/2019 by email. [629393] [18-1197] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 08/19/2019 05:15 PM]
- #1022019-08-19
REPLY of Appellant Apple Inc. to response [101]. Service: 08/19/2019 by email. [629182] [18-1197] [William Lee] [Entered: 08/19/2019 10:56 AM]
- #1012019-08-15
RESPONSE of Appellees VirnetX Inc. and Leidos, Inc. to the motion for other relief [99] filed by Appellants Apple Inc. and Apple Inc., motion vacate [99] filed by Appellants Apple Inc. and Apple Inc., supplemental authority [100] filed by Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 08/15/2019 by email. [628661] [18-1197] [Jeffrey Lamken] [Entered: 08/15/2019 03:47 PM]
- #1002019-08-12
Citation of Supplemental Authority pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j) for Appellant Apple Inc.. Service: 08/12/2019 by email. [627639] [18-1197] [William Lee] [Entered: 08/12/2019 03:17 PM]
- #992019-08-07
MODIFIED ENTRY: MOTION of Appellant Apple Inc. to Vacate Denial of Rehearing and for Leave to File a Second Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc and/or a Supplemental Brief [Consent: opposed]. Service: 08/07/2019 by email. [18-1197] [626699]--[Edited 08/07/2019 by JAB to correct relief] [William Lee] [Entered: 08/07/2019 02:28 PM]
- #982019-08-07
MOTION of Appellant Apple Inc. to stay execution of the mandate until resolution of motion to vacate denial of rehearing and for leave to file second petition for rehearing, resolution of related proceedings concerning patents-in-suit, and/or disposition of Apple petition for certiorari [Consent: opposed]. Service: 08/07/2019 by email. [626690] [18-1197] [William Lee] [Entered: 08/07/2019 02:20 PM]
- #972019-08-01
ORDER filed denying [78] petition for panel rehearing filed by Apple Inc.; denying [78] petition for en banc rehearing filed by Apple Inc. By: En Banc (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [625152] [JAB] [Entered: 08/01/2019 09:56 AM]
- #962019-07-19
18 paper copies of the Supplemental Brief [86] received from Appellant Apple Inc.. [622237] [CJF] [Entered: 07/19/2019 01:49 PM]
- #952019-07-19
18 paper copies of the Supplemental Appendix Brief [87] received from Appellant Apple Inc.. [622236] [CJF] [Entered: 07/19/2019 01:48 PM]
- #942019-07-18
18 paper copies of the Supplemental Brief [92] received from Appellees Leidos, Inc. and VirnetX Inc.. [622044] [CJF] [Entered: 07/18/2019 03:44 PM]
- #932019-07-17
ORDER filed. The motions ([85], [91]) are granted to the extent that the briefs ([86], [92]) and appendix [87] are accepted. The parties are directed to file 18 paper copies within 2 business days. By: Merits Panel (Per Curiam). Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [621781] [MJL] [Entered: 07/17/2019 03:56 PM]
- 2019-07-01
Clerk Order Filed
- #13011750112018-04-11
Court Order
- 2017-12-13
Clerk Order Filed
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.