Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard Company
Summary
Linex Technologies and Marvell Semiconductor sued Qualcomm Atheros, Ruckus Wireless, Meru Networks, Aruba Networks, and Apple over patent infringement in the Northern District of California. The case involves a patent dispute, though the specific patent number and technology at issue are not identified in the available case data.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2011-06-03)
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Covington & Burling LLPIan James Miller, Laura E. Underwood-Muschamp, Robert T. Haslam , III
- Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner, LLPRobert Daniels Wells, Robert Francis McCauley
- Covington Burling LLPGregory S Nieberg
- Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett and Dunner, LLPLaura Pollard Masurovsky
- Finnegan Hendeson Farabow Garrett & DunnerTroy Edwin Grabow
- McNamara Smith LLPSara J. O'Connell
- Milbank Tweed Hadley McCloyChristopher James Gaspar, Jennifer Lynne Miremadi
- Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLPMark Christopher Scarsi, Miguel Jesus Ruiz
- Milbank Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLPAshlee Nicole Lin
- Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLPLarry Scott Oliver
- Perkins Coie LLPMartin Edward Gilmore , III
- REED SMITH LLPSeth Benjamin Herring
- Wilmer Pickering Hale & Dorr LLPWilliam F. Lee
- KL Gates LLPMeghana Chandrakant RaoRane
- Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLPMichael K. Sheen
- Court
- U.S. District Court, Northern District of California
- Docket no.
- 4:13-cv-00159
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Claudia Wilken
- Filed
- 2013-01-15
- Last filing
- 2015-04-16
- Terminated
- 2014-05-20
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Linex Technologies, Inc. (plaintiff) Marvell Semiconductor, Inc. (plaintiff) Hewlett-Packard Company (plaintiff) Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. (defendant) Ruckus Wireless (defendant) Meru Networks (defendant) Aruba Networks Inc (defendant) Apple Computer Inc (defendant)
Docket entries
- 2012-08-23
SO ORDERED, re 29 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Robert T. Haslam, Deanna Kwong, Alan Blankenheimer, Laura E. Muschamp, Ian Miller, Sara J. O'Connell, Alexander Chinoy, and Gregory S. Nieberg of Covington Burling LLP filed by Apple Computer Inc. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 8/23. (mmm)
- 2012-08-07
Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Apple Computer Inc. answer due 9/7/2012; Aruba Networks, Inc. answer due 9/7/2012; Hewett-Packard Company answer due 9/7/2012; Meru Networks answer due 9/7/2012; Ruckus Wireless answer due 9/7/2012. (asw)
- 2012-07-17
SO ORDERED, re 25 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney W. Brent Rasmussen filed by Ruckus Wireless. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 7/17/2012. (asw)
- 2012-07-17
Pro Hac Vice Attorney W. Brent Rasmussen for Ruckus Wireless added for electronic noticing. (dmp, )
- 2012-07-13
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Cecilia Sanabria for Linex Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. (maw)
- 2012-07-10
CORRECTING ENTRY: The main document in D.I. 21 Motion for Pro Hac Vice has been replaced with its corrected version. (asw)
- 2012-07-10
SO ORDERED, re 21 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Cecilia Sanabria filed by Linex Technologies, Inc. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 7/10/2012. (asw)
- 2011-06-24
SO ORDERED, re 17 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Colby B. Springer and Shane Olafson filed by Ruckus Wireless. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 6/24/2011. (asw)
- 2011-06-14
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Diana Luo, L. Scott Oliver, and Jessica J. Tipton for Meru Networks added for electronic noticing. (nms)
- 2011-06-07
SO ORDERED, re 15 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer To Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Ruckus Wireless, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Ruckus Wireless answer due 7/5/2011. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 6/7/2011. (asw)
- 2011-06-03
SO ORDERED, re 14 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME and Order to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint to July 5, 2011 filed by Aruba Networks, Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Aruba Networks, Inc. answer due 7/5/2011. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 6/3/2011. (asw)
- 2011-06-03
SO ORDERED, re 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Complaint (Unopposed) filed by Hewett-Packard Company, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Hewett-Packard Company answer due 7/5/2011. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 6/3/2011. (asw)
- 2011-05-27
SO ORDERED, re 12 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to July 5, 2011 filed by Meru Networks, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Meru Networks answer due 7/5/2011. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 5/27/2011. (asw)
- 2011-05-27
CORRECTING ENTRY: The main document in D.I. 12, Stipulation to Extend Time hsa been replaced with its corrected version. (asw)
- 2011-05-26
SO ORDERED, re 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Vincent P. Kovalick, Smith R. Brittingham, IV, Scott A. Herbst, Rajeev Gupta, Rama G. Elluru, and Kenie Ho of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP filed by Linex Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 5/26/2011. (nms)
- 2011-05-26
CORRECTING ENTRY: The PDF for D.I. 11 has been replaced with an amended version per counsel's request. The new version adds a proposed order to the filing. (nms)
- 2011-05-24
SO ORDERED, re 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint, [UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND TIME] filed by Apple Computer Inc., Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Apple Computer Inc. answer due 7/5/2011.. Ordered by Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet on 5/24/2011. (asw)
- 2011-05-18
Case Assigned to Judge Gregory M. Sleet. Please include the initials of the Judge (GMS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
- 2011-05-11
Summons Issued as to Apple Computer Inc. on 5/11/2011; Aruba Networks, Inc. on 5/11/2011; Hewett-Packard Company on 5/11/2011; Meru Networks on 5/11/2011; Ruckus Wireless on 5/11/2011. (nms)
- 2011-05-06
No Summons Issued. (rwc)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.