Transparence, LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Summary
Transparence LLC sues Samsung for infringing its patent technology in electronic devices.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 2P · 2D · 5N (9 articles)
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
2 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 5 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 2 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 5 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- TCL Unit Fires Back At Samsung With Its Own OLED Patent SuitLaw360 · 2026-03-20
- Samsung Flooded with Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in US CourtLaw.com · 2024-11-21
- Pay transparency lawsuits spark accusations of ‘cottage industry’ in WAThe Seattle Times · 2025-02-23
- Jury Finds No Infringement In $2B IP Case Against SamsungLaw360 · 2025-01-21
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
- Court
- TXED
- Docket no.
- 2:24-cv-00910
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Judge
- Robert W. Schroeder III
- Filed
- 2024-11-11
- Last filing
- 2026-10-09
Cause
35:145 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Parties
Transparence, LLC (plaintiff) Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (defendant) Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (defendant) Daivd Keyzer (technical advisor) David Folsom (mediator)
Docket entries
- #1262026-07-08
No description on file
- #1252026-07-07
No description on file
- #1242026-07-07
No description on file
- 2026-07-07
No description on file
- #1232026-07-06
No description on file
- #1222026-07-06
No description on file
- #1212026-07-01
No description on file
- #1202026-06-24
No description on file
- 2026-04-24
No description on file
- 2026-04-24
NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference RESET for 9/17/2026 at 09:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea)
- 2026-03-20
No description on file
- 2026-03-20
NOTICE of Hearing: Markman/Claim Construction Hearing RESET for 3/31/2026 at 01:30 PM before Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (wea)
- 2025-02-18
No description on file
- 2025-02-18
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
- 2025-02-14
No description on file
- 2025-02-13
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Roy Payne: Scheduling Conference held on 2/13/24. Counsel for the parties appeared and were asked if they consented to a trial before the magistrate judge. The parties were then given Markman and jury selection dates. The parties were directed to meet and confer regarding any changes to the Courts proposed docket control order and discovery order, and the parties are to submit the proposed orders within fourteen days. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Andrea Fair; Defense - Tom Gorham. No exhibits. (Court Reporter - Not Recorded) (bga)
- 2024-11-12
No description on file
- 2024-11-12
No description on file
- 2024-11-12
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (NKL)
- 2024-11-12
Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (NKL)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.