PatentFed. Cir.25-1712

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Finelite, Inc.

Summary

Seoul Semiconductor sues Finelite for allegedly infringing LED lighting patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Coverage: 0P · 1D · 0N

Coverage breakdown — the headlines behind the meter

0 plaintiff-favorable · 1 defendant-favorable · 0 neutral

Plaintiff-favorable

None classified yet.

Defendant-favorable

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2026-05-11 · coverage 0P / 1D / 0NDocketFiled 2025-04-302025-05-20 · filing · favors defendant MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc. Service: 05/20…2025-05-20 · filing · favors defendant CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. […2025-05-21 · filing · favors defendant MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc. Service: 05/21/2…Apr 25Nov 25May 26filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the defendant
Other counsel (amici, etc.)
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Docket no.
25-1712
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2025-04-30
Last filing
2026-05-13

Entities in this case

Seoul Semiconductor7Finelite3

Parties

FINELITE, INC. SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. SEOUL VIOSYS CO., LTD. SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD.

Docket entries

  1. #542026-05-13

    No description on file

  2. #532026-05-13

    No description on file

  3. #372025-08-12

    The following conflict date requested by Thomas J. Rechen for Finelite, Inc. (see Doc. No. [36]) is not accepted at this time: 10/06/2025. Please review the Guidance on Oral Argument Scheduling Conflicts for more information. [1107637] [MJL] [Entered: 08/12/2025 10:44 AM]

  4. #362025-08-11

    Notice from Appellant Finelite, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 08/11/2025 by email. [1107486] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 08/11/2025 03:32 PM]

  5. #352025-07-14

    The following conflict date submitted by Thomas J. Rechen for Finelite, Inc. has been accepted by the court: 02/04/2026. [1101859] [MJL] [Entered: 07/14/2025 09:23 AM]

  6. #342025-07-10

    Notice from Appellee Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 07/10/2025 by email. [1101396] [25-1712] [Sean SeLegue] [Entered: 07/10/2025 12:34 PM]

  7. #332025-07-10

    Notice from Appellant Finelite, Inc. regarding conflicts with oral argument. Service: 07/10/2025 by email. [1101346] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 07/10/2025 11:05 AM]

  8. #322025-07-03

    Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts. Arguing counsel must advise of, and show good cause for, any scheduling conflicts during the upcoming court session months listed in the attached notice. The Response to Notice to Advise of Scheduling Conflicts can be found here. The Oral Argument Guide can be found here. [1100153] [MMA] [Entered: 07/03/2025 02:35 PM]

  9. #312025-05-29

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [16], [17] received from Appellee Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. [1092923] [JCP] [Entered: 05/29/2025 03:59 PM]

  10. #302025-05-27

    6 paper copies of Doc. No. [21], [27], [23] received from Appellant Finelite, Inc.. [1092238] [MVH] [Entered: 05/27/2025 03:59 PM]

  11. #292025-05-22

    Outstanding paper copies of all briefs and appendices must be submitted within five business days from the date of issuance of this notice. See Fed. Cir. R. 25(c)(3)(A). [1091610] [MMA] [Entered: 05/22/2025 03:53 PM]

  12. #282025-05-21

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. [25] for Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/21/2025 by email. [1091302] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/21/2025 04:54 PM]

  13. #272025-05-21

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc. Service: 05/21/2025 by email. [1091301] --[Edited 05/22/2025 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/21/2025 04:51 PM]

  14. #262025-05-20

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. [18] for Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090912] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:11 PM]

  15. #252025-05-20

    CORRECTED REPLY BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090909] [25-1712] This document has been corrected. See Doc No. [27] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:07 PM]

  16. #242025-05-20

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. for Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090908] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:05 PM]

  17. #232025-05-20

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED APPENDIX FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090906] --[Edited 05/22/2025 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 04:01 PM]

  18. #222025-05-20

    Notice of Correction to Doc No. [21] for Appellant Finelite, Inc.. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090901] [25-1712] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 03:55 PM]

  19. #212025-05-20

    MODIFIED ENTRY: CORRECTED OPENING BRIEF FILED by Appellant Finelite, Inc. Service: 05/20/2025 by email. [1090899] --[Edited 05/22/2025 by MMA - Reason: compliance review complete] [Thomas Rechen] [Entered: 05/20/2025 03:52 PM]

  20. #202025-05-15

    NOTICE OF NON-COMPLIANCE: The submission of Appellant Finelite, Inc., Opening Brief; Excerpts; Reply Brief [9], [18], is not in compliance with the rules of this court (see attached). Compliant document due on 05/22/2025. Service as of this date by the Clerk of Court. [1089928] [MMA] [Entered: 05/15/2025 04:49 PM]

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2025-08-12