PatentTXED4:23-cv-00803

Scale Video Coding LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Summary

Scale Video Coding sues Cisco for allegedly infringing its video compression patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Coverage events: 0P · 0D · 1N (1 article)

Latest ruling: neutral (2025-04-07)

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time▲ plaintiff-favorable▼ defendant-favorable2025-03-17 · coverage 0P / 0D / 1NDocketFiled 2023-09-112023-09-14 · ruling · favors defendant Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is gra…2025-04-07 · ruling · favors neutral MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The parties are ORDERED to not refer, directly or indirect…Sep 23Jun 24Apr 25filingruling■ plaintiff■ defendantweekly coverage · docket events

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
Court
TXED
Docket no.
4:23-cv-00803
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2023-09-11
Last filing
2026-05-08

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Docket entries

  1. #932026-05-08

    No description on file

  2. #922025-12-17

    No description on file

  3. #912025-08-25

    No description on file

  4. #902025-06-04

    No description on file

  5. #892025-04-30

    No description on file

  6. #882025-04-29

    No description on file

  7. #872025-04-14

    No description on file

  8. #862025-04-07

    MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The parties are ORDERED to not refer, directly or indirectly, to each other's claim-construction positions in the presence of the jury. Likewise, the parties are ORDERED to refrain from mentioning any part of this opinion, other than the definitions adopted by the Court, in the presence of the jury. The parties are also reminded that the testimony of any witness is bound by the Court's reasoning in this order but that any reference to claim-construction proceedings is limited to informing the jury of the definitions adopted by the Court. Signed by District Judge Sean D. Jordan on 4/7/2025. (CLC)

  9. 2025-04-01

    No description on file

  10. 2024-12-11

    No description on file

  11. 2024-12-06

    No description on file

  12. 2024-07-31

    No description on file

  13. 2024-01-18

    NOTICE: The Rule 16 management conference set for 1/22/2024 is cancelled. The Court will issue a scheduling order. (ldm)

  14. 2024-01-18

    No description on file

  15. 2023-09-14

    No description on file

  16. 2023-09-14

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Cisco Systems, Inc. to 11/17/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( rpc, )

  17. 2023-09-11

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (jmb)

  18. 2023-09-11

    No description on file

  19. 2023-09-11

    No description on file

  20. 2023-09-11

    Case assigned to District Judge Sean D. Jordan. (jmb)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19