Valtrus Innovations Ltd. v. T-Mobile USA, Inc. <b><font color="red">PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER, DOCKET IN LEAD CASE 2:23CV443</font></b>

Summary

Valtrus Innovations sues T-Mobile and OnePlus for infringing its patented technology in mobile devices.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. Sprint Corp. T-Mobile US, Inc. T-Mobile USA, Inc. Valtrus Innovations Ltd.

Docket entries

1. #252024-08-22

   Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120)

2. #242024-07-03

   ORDER granting 92 Stipulation of Dismissal as to OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. (Consolidated from 2:23-cv-444), OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd., OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. (Consolidated from 2:23-cv-444) and OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. terminated.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 7/3/2024. Associated Cases: 2:23-cv-00443-JRG, 2:23-cv-00444-JRG(CH) (Entered: 07/03/2024)

3. #232023-12-14

   NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jeffrey John Catalano on behalf of OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd., OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. (Catalano, Jeffrey) (Entered: 12/14/2023)

4. #222023-12-04

   NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Holly Elin Engelmann on behalf of Sprint Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Engelmann, Holly) Modified on 12/14/2023 (ch, ). (Entered: 12/04/2023)

5. #212023-12-04

   NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kevin Paul Anderson on behalf of Sprint Corp., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. (Anderson, Kevin) Modified on 12/14/2023 (ch, ). (Entered: 12/04/2023)

6. #202023-11-02

   CONSOLIDATION ORDER - The above-captioned cases are hereby ORDERED to be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:23-cv-00443. All parties are instructed to file any future filings in the LEAD CASE. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 11/2/2023. (ch, ) (Entered: 11/02/2023)

7. #192023-10-19

   Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint on behalf of OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd.; OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd.(Fair, Andrea) (Entered: 10/19/2023)

8. 2023-10-19

   Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for OnePlus Mobile Communications (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. to 12/4/2023; OnePlus Technology (Shenzen) Co., Ltd. to 12/4/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

9. 2023-10-19

   Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

10. #182023-10-12

    NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Navid Cyrus Bayar on behalf of Valtrus Innovations Ltd. (Bayar, Navid) (Entered: 10/12/2023)

11. #172023-10-12

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sprint Corp..( Smith, Melissa) (Entered: 10/12/2023)

12. 2023-10-12

    Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

13. 2023-10-12

    Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Corp. to 12/3/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )

14. 2023-09-29

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 12/3/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

15. 2023-09-29

    Application Granted for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint

16. 2023-09-29

    Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 12/3/2023. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, )

17. 2023-09-27

    In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )

18. 2023-09-27

    Notice of Magistrate Availability

19. 2023-09-27

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

20. 2023-09-27

    Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.