PatentDED1:24-cv-01433

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Koninklijke KPN N.V.

Summary

Samsung Electronics sued KPN and TNO for patent infringement, alleging unauthorized use of patented technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
For the defendant
  • Independent counselAlexandra G. White, Andres C. Healy, Eliza Finley +2 more
  • Farnan LLPBrian E. Farnan
Court
DED
Docket no.
1:24-cv-01433
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2024-12-31
Last filing
2025-07-30

Cause

35:1 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO Koninklijke KPN N.V. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Docket entries

  1. 2025-04-08

    Add Attorneys - PHV only

  2. 2025-04-08

    Pro Hac Vice Attorney Chunmeng Yang,Yunzhi Leon Lin, Arian Koochesfahani for Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (cdd)

  3. 2025-03-13

    Add Attorneys - PHV only

  4. 2025-03-13

    SO ORDERED

  5. 2025-03-13

    SO ORDERED, re (21 in 1:24-cv-01433-CFC, 22 in 1:25-cv-00001-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Alexandra White, Andres Healy, Tamar Lusztig, Hunter Vance, and Eliza Finley, filed by Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO, Koninklijke KPN N.V. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/13/2025. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00001-CFC, 1:24-cv-01433-CFC (kmd)

  6. 2025-03-13

    Pro Hac Vice Attorney Andres C. Healy, Tamar E. Lusztig, Alexandra G. White, Eliza Finley, Hunter Vance for Koninklijke KPN N.V., Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek TNO added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00001-CFC, 1:24-cv-01433-CFC(scs)

  7. 2025-03-13

    -District Court Pro Hac Vice Fee - 05 Attorneys Credit Card Payment

  8. 2025-03-06

    SO ORDERED, re (18 in 1:25-cv-00001-CFC, 17 in 1:24-cv-01433-CFC) MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arian Koochesfahani, Yunzhi Leon Lin, and Chunmeng Yang, filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/6/2025. Associated Cases: 1:25-cv-00001-CFC, 1:24-cv-01433-CFC (kmd)

  9. 2025-03-06

    -District Court Pro Hac Vice Fee - 03 Attorneys Credit Card Payment

  10. 2025-03-06

    SO ORDERED

  11. 2025-01-08

    SO ORDERED, re 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Sean Pak, Jared W. Newton, and Kevin Hardy filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/8/2025. (mws)

  12. 2025-01-08

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

  13. 2025-01-08

    Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)

  14. 2025-01-08

    SO ORDERED

  15. 2025-01-03

    -District Court Pro Hac Vice Fee - 03 Attorneys Credit Card Payment

  16. 2025-01-02

    Remark: Case submitted for routine judicial assignment. (cdd)

  17. 2025-01-02

    Oral Order AND ~Util - Set Deadlines

  18. 2025-01-02

    Remark

  19. 2025-01-02

    ORAL ORDER. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file its Complaint under seal (D.I. 1 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED insofar as it seeks to file the Complaint under seal. It is DENIED insofar as it seeks permission to file Exhibit A as the redacted public version of the Complaint. The only thing in paragraph 14 of the Complaint for which good cause exists for keeping it from the public is the amount of the payment (i.e., two words). No good cause exists to maintain under seal anything in paragraphs 15, 16, 20, 21, 25, 50, 57, 63, 69, 74, 80, 86, 92, and 98 of the Complaint. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file no later than January 9, 2025 a redacted version of the Complaint consistent with this ORAL ORDER. (Setting Deadlines: Notice of Compliance deadline set for 1/9/2025.) Ordered by Unassigned Judge on 1/2/2025. (kmd)

  20. 2024-12-31

    Remark: Exit Electronic Copies to Duty Judge, CFC (cdd)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19