Keysoft, Inc. v. Salesforce, Inc.
Summary
Keysoft sues Salesforce for allegedly infringing its software patents.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2024-06-05)
Counsel of record
- Independent counselJill M. Browning, Michael J. Fink, P. Branko Pejic
- Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor LLPDaniel G. Mackrides
- Young, Conaway, Stargatt & Taylor LLPAdam Wyatt Poff
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:24-cv-00257
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Disposition
- dismissed
- Filed
- 2024-02-26
- Last filing
- 2024-12-06
- Terminated
- 2024-12-06
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- #212024-12-06
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
- #202024-12-06
ORDER GRANTING re 18 Joint MOTION to Dismiss filed by Keysoft, Inc., ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 12/6/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 12/06/2024)
- #192024-12-04
Letter to The Honorable Gregory B. Williams from Adam W. Poff regarding Status of Plaintiff's claims for relief - re 18 Joint MOTION to Dismiss. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 12/04/2024)
- #182024-11-20
Joint MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Keysoft, Inc.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 11/20/2024)
- #172024-11-13
ORDER re 16 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Keysoft, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 11/13/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 11/13/2024)
- #162024-11-12
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint - filed by Keysoft, Inc.. (Mackrides, Daniel) (Entered: 11/12/2024)
- #152024-10-09
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint - filed by Keysoft, Inc.. (Mackrides, Daniel) (Entered: 10/09/2024)
- #142024-09-09
ORDER re 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Keysoft, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 9/9/2024. (lnb) (Entered: 09/09/2024)
- #132024-09-06
Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint - filed by Keysoft, Inc.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 09/06/2024)
- 2024-07-23
SO ORDERED
- 2024-07-23
Add Attorneys - PHV only
- 2024-07-23
SO ORDERED, re 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jill M. Browning, P. Branko Pejic and Michael J. Fink filed by Keysoft, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 7/23/2024. (lnb)
- 2024-07-23
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Jill M. Browning, Michael J. Fink, P. Branko Pejic for Keysoft, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mws)
- 2024-07-22
-District Court Pro Hac Vice Fee - 03 Attorneys Credit Card Payment
- 2024-06-05
SO ORDERED
- 2024-06-05
SO ORDERED, re 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint filed by Keysoft, Inc. Signed by Judge Gregory B. Williams on 6/5/2024. (lnb)
- 2024-02-28
Case Assigned/Reassigned
- 2024-02-28
Case Assigned to Judge Gregory B. Williams. Please include the initials of the Judge (GBW) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:24-cv-00256-GBW, 1:24-cv-00257-GBW (rjb)
- 2024-02-26
No Summons Issued
- 2024-02-26
No Summons Issued. (mrr)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.