Is the press coverage of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc. aligned with the court record?

Coverage leans toward the defendant. No classified ruling yet to compare against the court record.

Patent DED1:23-cv-01122Closed

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc.

Samsung is being sued by Netlist for allegedly infringing memory technology patents.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Prior 16P · 19D · 22N (88 articles)→Recent 30d 1P · 2D · 0N (11 articles)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

26 plaintiff-favorable · 38 defendant-favorable · 35 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 17 plaintiff · 21 defendant · 22 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

Samsung, Netlist settle patent dispute in 5-year, $897 mn allianceKED Global · 2026-08-06
Samsung Electronics (KOSE:A005930) Could Be 26% Overvalued After Netlist Patent Probesimplywall.st · 2026-07-22
U.S. Opens Patent Probe Into Samsung AI Memory Chips, Pulling Nvidia, Google, and Broadcom Into Widening Netlist DisputeTekedia · 2026-07-17
US probes Samsung for alleged infringement of Netlist's memory-chip patentsMSN · 2026-07-17

Defendant-favorable

Netlist (NLST) turns profitable as 2026 revenue triples and eyes $200M Samsung cashStock Titan · 2026-08-11
Samsung to pay Netlist up to US$897 million to settle memory patent disputedigitimes · 2026-08-06
Samsung Ends Patent Dispute With $897 Million Deal, Signs Five-Year Strategic Agreement With Netlist; NLST Surges 58%TradingKey · 2026-08-06
Samsung Settles Patent Dispute With Netlist, Agrees to 5-Year Memory Supply DealSeoul Economic Daily · 2026-08-06

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Independent counselAlice J. Ahn, Brian Nester, Peter A. Swanson +1 more
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLPJack B. Blumenfeld, Rodger Dallery Smith , II

For the defendant

Shaw Keller LLPEmily DiBenedetto, Karen Elizabeth Keller

Court: DED
Docket no.: 1:23-cv-01122
Nature of suit: Patent
Filed: 2023-10-09
Last filing: 2026-06-18
Terminated: 2026-06-17

Cause

35:1 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Samsung97 Netlist29

Parties

Netlist, Inc. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Samsung Semiconductor, Inc. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Docket entries

2026-06-09
No description on file
2026-06-09
No description on file
2025-07-07
SO ORDERED, re (34 in 1:24-cv-00614-JLH, 27 in 1:23-cv-01122-JLH) Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for the Parties to Submit a Proposed Scheduling Order and Letter to July 7, 2025. Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 7/7/2025. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-01122-JLH, 1:24-cv-00614-JLH(ceg)
2025-07-07
No description on file
2025-06-23
No description on file
2025-06-23
SO ORDERED, re 25 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to respond to Defendant's Counterclaims (D.I. 21 ) to July 7, 2025; and for Plaintiffs to Respond to Defendant's Motion to Stay (D.I. 23 ) to July 11, 2025. (*Reset Briefing Schedule re 23 MOTION to Stay Pending Resolution of Inter Partes Review: Answering Brief due 7/11/2025). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 6/23/2025. (ceg)
2025-06-03
No description on file
2025-04-22
SO ORDERED, re 19 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for Defendant Netlist, Inc. to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 2, 2025. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Netlist, Inc. answer due 6/2/2025). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 4/22/2025. (ceg)
2025-04-22
No description on file
2025-03-14
No description on file
2025-03-14
SO ORDERED, re 18 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time for Defendant Netlist, Inc. to move, plead, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 2, 2025. (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Netlist, Inc. answer due 5/2/2025). Ordered by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 3/14/2025. (ceg)
2024-01-09
No description on file
2024-01-09
Case Reassigned to Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Please include the initials of the Judge (JLH) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
2023-11-21
No description on file
2023-11-20
No description on file
2023-11-14
SO ORDERED, re 10 STIPULATION to Extend Time to file public version of D.I. 9 to November 20, 2023. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/14/2023. (nms)
2023-11-14
No description on file
2023-10-25
No description on file
2023-10-24
No description on file
2023-10-11
No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-06-18

Summary

Coverage vs reality meter