PatentDED1:22-cv-00069

Onstream Media Corporation v. Vidyo, Inc.

Get an email the moment anything new is filed on this docket.

Summary

Onstream Media sues Vidyo for patent infringement in video streaming technology dispute.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Coverage vs realityNo signal

Latest ruling: neutral (2022-02-10)

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff
  • Independent counselChandran B. Iyer, Oded Burger, Ronald M. Daignault +1 more
  • Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLCRichard Charles Weinblatt, Stamatios Stamoulis
For the defendant
Court
DED
Docket no.
1:22-cv-00069
Nature of suit
Patent
Filed
2022-01-18
Last filing
2022-04-19

Cause

35:1 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Onstream Media4Vidyo

Parties

Onstream Media Corporation (plaintiff) Vidyo, Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

  1. 2022-03-31

    SO ORDERED, re 20 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vidyo, Inc. answer due 4/14/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/31/2022. (nms)

  2. 2022-03-31

    ~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED

  3. 2022-03-17

    ~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED

  4. 2022-03-17

    SO ORDERED, re 19 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint (*Reset Answer Deadlines: Vidyo, Inc. answer due 3/31/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 3/17/2022. (nms)

  5. 2022-03-04

    Oral Order

  6. 2022-02-23

    ~Util - Set Briefing Schedule - open,ans,reply,surreply AND SO ORDERED

  7. 2022-02-23

    SO ORDERED, re 13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time (*Reset Briefing Schedule: re 7 MOTION to Dismiss. Answering Brief due 3/3/2022). Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/23/2022. (nms)

  8. 2022-02-16

    Add Attorneys - PHV only

  9. 2022-02-16

    Pro Hac Vice Attorney Oded Burger,Chandran B. Iyer,Ronald M. Daignault for Onstream Media Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (apk)

  10. 2022-02-16

    Pro Hac Vice Attorney Zachary H. Ellis for Onstream Media Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk)

  11. 2022-02-16

    Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice

  12. 2022-02-15

    SO ORDERED

  13. 2022-02-15

    SO ORDERED, re 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran B. Iyer, Oded Burger and Zachary H. Ellis, filed by Onstream Media Corporation. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/15/2022. (nms)

  14. 2022-02-14

    Add Attorneys - PHV only

  15. 2022-02-14

    Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice

  16. 2022-02-14

    Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Nan Lan, Neil J. McNabnay, and Michael A. Vincent for Vidyo, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)

  17. 2022-02-10

    SO ORDERED, re 11 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Neil J. McNabnay, Michael Vincent and Nan Lan, filed by Vidyo, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 2/10/2022. (nms)

  18. 2022-02-10

    SO ORDERED

  19. 2022-01-26

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

  20. 2022-01-26

    Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on XLinkedIn
View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-05-19