Savannah Licensing, LLC v. Snapchat, Inc.
Summary
Savannah Licensing sues Snapchat for allegedly infringing its patented technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2022-05-13)
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- The Chong Law Firm, P.A.Jimmy C. Chong
- Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLPCameron Paul Clark, Karen Jacobs
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:22-cv-00138
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2022-01-31
- Last filing
- 2022-05-13
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- #122022-05-13
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 8,680.992; US 9,454,777. (Attachments: # 1 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal)(kmd) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
- #112022-05-13
NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Savannah Licensing, LLC as to Snapchat, Inc. (Chong, Jimmy) (Entered: 05/13/2022)
- 2022-05-13
CASE CLOSED per 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal. (kmd)
- 2022-05-13
~Util - Terminate Civil Case
- #102022-04-27
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to May 13, 2022 - filed by Snapchat, Inc.. (Clark, Cameron) (Entered: 04/27/2022)
- 2022-04-27
~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED
- 2022-04-27
SO ORDERED, re 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to May 13, 2022, filed by Snapchat, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Snapchat, Inc. answer due 5/13/2022. Order by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/27/2022. (kmd)
- #92022-04-08
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 04/29/2022 - filed by Savannah Licensing, LLC. (Chong, Jimmy) (Entered: 04/08/2022)
- 2022-04-08
SO ORDERED, re 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 04/29/2022 filed by Savannah Licensing, LLC, Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Snapchat, Inc. answer due 4/29/2022. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/8/2022. (nmf)
- 2022-04-08
~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED
- #82022-02-24
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kelly C. Hunsaker and Eimeric Reig-Plessis - filed by Snapchat, Inc.. (Clark, Cameron) (Entered: 02/24/2022)
- 2022-02-24
SO ORDERED
- 2022-02-24
SO ORDERED, re 8 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kelly C. Hunsaker and Eimeric Reig-Plessis, filed by Snapchat, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/24/2022. (kmd)
- #72022-02-16
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Snap, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 11, 2022 - filed by Snapchat, Inc.. (Jacobs, Karen) (Entered: 02/16/2022)
- 2022-02-16
~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED
- 2022-02-16
SO ORDERED, re 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendant Snap, Inc. to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint (D.I. 1) to April 11, 2022, filed by Snapchat, Inc. Reset Answer Deadlines: Snapchat, Inc. answer due 4/11/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/16/2022. (kmd)
- #62022-02-08
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Savannah Licensing, LLC. Snapchat, Inc. served on 2/4/2022, answer due 2/25/2022. (Chong, Jimmy) (Entered: 02/08/2022)
- 2022-02-02
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:22-cv-00138-CFC, 1:22-cv-00139-CFC, 1:22-cv-00140-CFC (rjb)
- 2022-02-02
Case Assigned/Reassigned
- #52022-01-31
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Snapchat, Inc. on 1/31/2022. (nmg) (Entered: 01/31/2022)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.