ViaTech Technologies, Inc. v. Adobe Inc.
Summary
ViaTech Technologies sues Adobe for patent infringement over unspecified technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage events: 1P · 1D · 0N (5 articles)
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
4 plaintiff-favorable · 1 defendant-favorable · 0 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 1 plaintiff · 1 defendant · 0 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
- Adobe Owes $33.8 Million After Anti-Piracy Tech Patent Trial (1)news.bloombergtax.com · 2023-09-28
- Adobe hit with US$33.8 million patent verdict over digital licensing technologyThe Business Times · 2023-09-28
- Adobe Owes $33.8 Million After Anti-Piracy Tech Patent Trial (1)Bloomberg Law News · 2023-09-28
- Adobe hit with $33.8 million patent verdict over digital licensing technologyReuters · 2023-09-28
- Adobe’s $33.8 Million Anti-Piracy Tech Jury Verdict VacatedBloomberg Law News · 2024-07-18
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
- Ashby & GeddesAndrew Colin Mayo, John G. Day
- Independent counselMichael N. Zachary, Richard C. Lin
- Richards, Layton & Finger, PAKelly E. Farnan
- Independent counselMatthew J. Moffa
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:22-cv-00598
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2022-05-03
- Last filing
- 2026-05-18
Cause
35:1 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- 2026-05-18
No description on file
- 2024-09-13
No description on file
- 2023-03-10
No description on file
- 2023-01-24
No description on file
- 2022-06-24
No description on file
- 2022-06-22
No description on file
- 2022-06-21
No description on file
- 2022-06-17
No description on file
- 2022-06-10
No description on file
- 2022-06-09
No description on file
- 2022-05-20
No description on file
- 2022-05-13
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael N. Zachary for ViaTech Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
- 2022-05-13
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Richard C. Lin for ViaTech Technologies, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
- 2022-05-13
No description on file
- 2022-05-12
No description on file
- 2022-05-12
SO ORDERED, re 6 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Denise M. De Mory, Michael N. Zachary, and Richard C. Lin, filed by ViaTech Technologies, Inc.. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 5/12/2022. (nms)
- 2022-05-11
No description on file
- 2022-05-11
Case Assigned to Judge Richard G. Andrews. Please include the initials of the Judge (RGA) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
- 2022-05-03
No Summons Issued. (mal)
- 2022-05-03
No description on file
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.