Valyrian IP LLC v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc.

Summary

Valyrian IP LLC sues Zoom for infringing its patents in video communication technology.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs reality meter

Cause

35:271 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Parties

Valyrian IP LLC (plaintiff) Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (defendant)

Docket entries

1. #222022-01-24

   Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. (ntl) (Entered: 01/24/2022)

2. 2022-01-21

   Terminate Case - Civil

3. #212022-01-20

   NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal by Valyrian IP LLC as to Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (Chong, Jimmy) (Entered: 01/20/2022)

4. 2022-01-20

   CASE CLOSED (ntl)

5. 2022-01-11

   Case Referred to Mediation - Magistrate Judge only

6. 2022-01-11

   CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Sherry R. Fallon for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrderforADR-Mediation.pdf (Taylor, Daniel)

7. 2021-12-20

   SO ORDERED

8. 2021-12-20

   SO ORDERED D.I. 13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Timothy C. Saulsbury and Andrew T. Jones filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/20/2021. (dlb)

9. 2021-12-10

   Oral Order

10. 2021-11-29

    SO ORDERED D.I. 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the Defendant to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to December 9, 2021 filed by Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/29/2021. (dlb)

11. 2021-11-29

    ~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED

12. 2021-10-12

    SO ORDERED

13. 2021-10-12

    SO ORDERED D.I. 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Answer the Complaint to 11/29/2021 filed by Valyrian IP LLC.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/12/2021. (mlc)

14. 2021-10-08

    Remark

15. 2021-10-08

    Remark re Newer Attorneys

16. 2021-10-08

    REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01382-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-01384-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-01385-LPS-CJB(dlb)

17. 2021-10-08

    Remark: The parties should follow the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtesy Copies, a copy of which is found on Judge Burkes portion of the District Court's webpage: https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/magistrate-judge-christopher-j-burke Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01382-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-01384-LPS-CJB, 1:21-cv-01385-LPS-CJB(dlb)

18. 2021-10-06

    Case Assigned/Reassigned

19. 2021-10-06

    Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

20. 2021-10-06

    Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:21-cv-01382-LPS, 1:21-cv-01384-LPS, 1:21-cv-01385-LPS (rjb)

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.