Is the press coverage of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc. aligned with the court record?

Coverage leans toward the defendant. No classified ruling yet to compare against the court record.

Patent DED1:21-cv-01453Closed

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Netlist, Inc.

Samsung is sued by Netlist for infringing patents related to memory technology and data storage.

Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.

Coverage vs realityPress: defendant

Prior 18P · 23D · 23N (122 articles)→Recent 30d 0P · 1D · 1N (5 articles)

Press coverage leans defendant-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.

Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter

31 plaintiff-favorable · 54 defendant-favorable · 42 neutral articles

The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 18 plaintiff · 24 defendant · 24 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.

Plaintiff-favorable

Samsung, Netlist settle patent dispute in 5-year, $897 mn allianceKED Global · 2026-08-06
Samsung’s Long-Running Patent Fight With Netlist Is Finally OverSammyGuru · 2026-08-05
NLST Stock Sees Biggest Single-Day Gain In 5 Years After Samsung Ends Patent Fight, Takes 10M Share StakeTradingView · 2026-08-05
US probes Samsung for alleged infringement of Netlist's memory-chip patentsETLegalWorld.com · 2026-07-17

Defendant-favorable

Netlist and Samsung Sign Five-Year Patent, Supply, and Technology AgreementsStorageReview.com · 2026-08-10
Netlist and Samsung Sign Five-Year Patent, Supply, and Technology AgreementsStorageReview.com · 2026-08-10
Samsung to pay Netlist up to US$897 million to settle memory patent disputedigitimes · 2026-08-06
Samsung Electronics settles patent dispute with Netlist through 5-year licensing dealThe Korea Times · 2026-08-06

Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time

Counsel of record

For the plaintiff

Independent counselAlan M. Rabinowitz, Azaad Zimmermann, Cameron Lindsay +7 more
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLPAnthony David Raucci

For the defendant

Independent counselAndrew J. Strabone, Daniel E. Yonan, David Z. Kahn +2 more

Other counsel (amici, etc.)

Independent counselDeepa Acharya, Elle Wang, Michael Trombetta
Richards, Layton & Finger, PASara M. Metzler

Court: DED
Docket no.: 1:21-cv-01453
Nature of suit: Patent
Judge: Jennifer L. Hall
Filed: 2021-10-15
Last filing: 2026-08-21
Terminated: 2026-08-20

Cause

35:1 Patent Infringement

Entities in this case

Samsung97 Netlist29

Docket entries

2026-03-06
No description on file
2023-12-01
No description on file
2023-11-30
No description on file
2023-11-29
No description on file
2023-11-27
No description on file
2023-09-11
No description on file
2023-08-11
No description on file
2023-07-12
No description on file
2023-06-28
No description on file
2023-06-28
No description on file
2022-12-21
No description on file
2022-12-07
No description on file
2022-12-01
No description on file
2022-11-29
No description on file
2022-10-07
No description on file
2022-08-25
No description on file
2022-08-24
No description on file
2021-11-17
No description on file
2021-11-16
No description on file
2021-11-11
No description on file

Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.

ShareShare on X LinkedIn

🔔 Get an email when this case has a new filing.Sign in →

View on CourtListener →Open in feed →Last updated 2026-08-21

Summary