ImmerVision, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
Summary
ImmerVision sues Apple for infringing its patented immersive imaging technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Coverage vs realityPress: plaintiff
Coverage events: 3P · 2D · 3N (8 articles)
Press coverage leans plaintiff-favorable; no court ruling has been classified yet.
Coverage breakdown — the articles behind the meter
3 plaintiff-favorable · 2 defendant-favorable · 3 neutral articles
The meter counts distinct coverage events, not articles: 3 plaintiff · 2 defendant · 3 neutral events — a burst of same-stance coverage counts once, however many outlets ran it.
Plaintiff-favorable
- Apple Ordered To Pay $110.7 Million For Violating Spanish Firm’s Wireless Technology Patent: ReportMSN · 2025-07-01
- The wide-angle camera lawsuit against Apple widens further with the iPhone 12 and iPad ProPhoneArena · 2021-12-10
- Apple refuses to fix an iPhone that the owner claims the company destroyedPhoneArena · 2021-10-24
Defendant-favorable
Coverage sentiment vs. docket activity over time
Counsel of record
For the plaintiff
- Panitch Schwarze Belisario & Nadel LLPDennis James Butler, John David Simmons, Keith Aaron Jones
- Independent counselKeith A. Jones, Philip L. Hirschhorn
For the defendant
- Independent counselCaleb A. Kennedy, Doug Winnard, Jennifer M Hartjes +5 more
- Potter Anderson & Corroon, LLPBindu Ann George Palapura, David Ellis Moore
- Duane Morris LLPBrandon Ryan Harper
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:21-cv-01484
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2021-10-22
- Last filing
- 2026-02-24
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement