Longbeam Technologies LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Summary
Longbeam Technologies sues Amazon for infringing its patent technology.
Summary generated by AI from public docket data. Verify against the original filing before relying on it.
Coverage vs reality meter
Latest ruling: neutral (2021-11-17)
Counsel of record
- Independent counselChristian E. Samay, Iyer B. Chandran, Oded Burger +2 more
- Stamoulis & Weinblatt LLCRichard Charles Weinblatt, Stamatios Stamoulis
- Independent counselAdam M. Greenfield, David Zucker, Gabriel K. Bell +2 more
- Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLPJeremy A. Tigan
- Court
- DED
- Docket no.
- 1:21-cv-01559
- Nature of suit
- Patent
- Filed
- 2021-11-01
- Last filing
- 2022-10-17
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Entities in this case
Docket entries
- 2022-08-23
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Oded Burger for Longbeam Technologies LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb)
- 2022-08-23
SO ORDERED, re 38 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Oded Burger, filed by Longbeam Technologies LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/23/2022. (kmd)
- 2022-08-23
SO ORDERED
- 2022-08-23
Add Attorneys - PHV only
- 2022-08-17
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed the parties' filings with respect to Longbeam's Rule 7.1 disclosure statements and its statements regarding third-party funding, I have concerns about Longbeam's standing to pursue this action and whether it has complied with the Court's standing order regarding third-party litigation funding arrangements. Accordingly, I will grant Amazon's request to conduct threshold discovery on these matters and will STAY the case in all other respects. Such threshold discovery may include, but is not necessarily limited to, documents and testimony from Longbeam's principals relevant to the issues of standing and third-party litigation funding, including the nature and extent of IP Edge's interests in this litigation and the asserted patents. Case stayed. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/17/2022. (nmf)
- 2022-08-17
~Util - Case Stayed AND Oral Order
- 2022-07-13
ORAL ORDER: For the reasons stated on the record during the Oral Argument held today, D.I. 20 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Longbeam Technologies LLC's Amended Complaint filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. is denied. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/13/2022. (nmf)
- 2022-07-13
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Oral Argument held on 7/13/2022. (Court Reporter Bonnie Archer.) (nmf)
- 2022-07-12
Reset Hearings: The Oral Argument is rescheduled for 7/13/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
- 2022-05-13
ORAL ORDER: The parties are directed to certify within five days that they have complied with Chief Judge Connolly's April 18, 2022 Standing Order Regarding Disclosure Statements Required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. The parties are also reminded of their obligation to comply with Chief Judge Connolly's April 18, 2022 Standing Order Regarding Third-Party Funding Arrangements. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/13/2022. (nmf)
- 2022-04-08
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearings( An Oral Argument is set for 7/13/2022 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly.) Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/8/2022. (nmf)
- 2022-04-08
~Util - Set Hearings AND Oral Order
- 2022-01-25
SO ORDERED, re 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ronald M. Daignault, Chandran D. Iyer, Zachary H. Ellis and Christian E. Samay, filed by Longbeam Technologies LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/25/2022. (kmd)
- 2022-01-25
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Ronald M. Daignault, Christian E. Samay, Iyer B. Chandran, Zachary H. Ellis for Longbeam Technologies LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
- 2022-01-25
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Adam M. Greenfield, David Zucker, Kimberly Q. Li, Gabriel K. Bell, Maximillian Grant for Amazon Web Services, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
- 2021-11-17
SO ORDERED
- 2021-11-17
SO ORDERED, re 10 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Maximilian A. Grant, Adam M. Greenfield, Gabriel K. Bell, David A. Zucker, and Kimberly Q. Li, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/17/2021. (kmd)
- 2021-11-12
SO ORDERED, re 9 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 24, 2022, filed by Amazon Web Services, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Amazon Web Services, Inc. answer due 1/24/2022; Amazon.com, Inc. answer due 1/24/2022. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/12/2021. (kmd)
- 2021-11-12
~Util - Set/Reset Answer Deadline AND SO ORDERED
- 2021-11-03
Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (nms)
Docket history from CourtListener/RECAP — most recent first.